{"title":"Pulsation artifact reduction using compressed sensitivity encoding in Gd-EOB-DTPA contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.","authors":"Masafumi Nakamura, Yasuo Takatsu, Mutsumi Yoshizawa, Kenichiro Yamamura, Tosiaki Miyati","doi":"10.1007/s12194-024-00858-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI, cardiac pulsation artifacts in the left lobe often hinder diagnosis, the image quality need to improve. This study aimed to reduce cardiac pulsation artifacts in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced three-dimensional (3D) T1-weighted turbo-field echo (3D-T1TFE) using compressed sensitivity encoding (CS).For phantom evaluation, the cardiac phantom was manually operated using a metronome-synchronized apparatus, comprising a bag-valve mask, a breathing circuit, and a Jackson-Rees system. Transverse images of a liver phantom were acquired using enhanced T1 high-resolution isotropic volumetric excitation with CS (CS-eTHRIVE) and sensitivity encoding (S-eTHRIVE). For evaluation, images obtained during cardiac phantom operation were subtracted from those obtained when the phantom was stationary. Standard deviation (SD) of the difference images was used as the evaluation metric, and assessments were conducted based on changes in heart rate and TFE factor. For clinical image evaluation, artifacts in hepatobiliary phase images acquired 15 min after Gd-EOB-DTPA injection in the order of S-eTHRIVE and CS-eTHRIVE were visually evaluated at four levels. In heart-rate evaluation (40, 60, and 80 beats/min), CS-eTHRIVE revealed significantly lower SD values compared to S-eTHRIVE across all heart rates (P < 0.01), with no significant differences between heart rates. For TFE factor evaluation, CS-eTHRIVE with a factor of 35 exhibited the lowest SD, which was significantly different from all other groups (P < 0.01). In clinical image evaluation, CS-eTHRIVE achieved higher visual scores (mean ± SD: 3.72 ± 0.46) compared with S-eTHRIVE (2.72 ± 0.98, P < 0.01).CS reduced pulsation artifacts in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced 3D-T1TFE.</p>","PeriodicalId":46252,"journal":{"name":"Radiological Physics and Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiological Physics and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-024-00858-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI, cardiac pulsation artifacts in the left lobe often hinder diagnosis, the image quality need to improve. This study aimed to reduce cardiac pulsation artifacts in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced three-dimensional (3D) T1-weighted turbo-field echo (3D-T1TFE) using compressed sensitivity encoding (CS).For phantom evaluation, the cardiac phantom was manually operated using a metronome-synchronized apparatus, comprising a bag-valve mask, a breathing circuit, and a Jackson-Rees system. Transverse images of a liver phantom were acquired using enhanced T1 high-resolution isotropic volumetric excitation with CS (CS-eTHRIVE) and sensitivity encoding (S-eTHRIVE). For evaluation, images obtained during cardiac phantom operation were subtracted from those obtained when the phantom was stationary. Standard deviation (SD) of the difference images was used as the evaluation metric, and assessments were conducted based on changes in heart rate and TFE factor. For clinical image evaluation, artifacts in hepatobiliary phase images acquired 15 min after Gd-EOB-DTPA injection in the order of S-eTHRIVE and CS-eTHRIVE were visually evaluated at four levels. In heart-rate evaluation (40, 60, and 80 beats/min), CS-eTHRIVE revealed significantly lower SD values compared to S-eTHRIVE across all heart rates (P < 0.01), with no significant differences between heart rates. For TFE factor evaluation, CS-eTHRIVE with a factor of 35 exhibited the lowest SD, which was significantly different from all other groups (P < 0.01). In clinical image evaluation, CS-eTHRIVE achieved higher visual scores (mean ± SD: 3.72 ± 0.46) compared with S-eTHRIVE (2.72 ± 0.98, P < 0.01).CS reduced pulsation artifacts in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced 3D-T1TFE.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of the journal Radiological Physics and Technology is to provide a forum for sharing new knowledge related to research and development in radiological science and technology, including medical physics and radiological technology in diagnostic radiology, nuclear medicine, and radiation therapy among many other radiological disciplines, as well as to contribute to progress and improvement in medical practice and patient health care.