Equity of access to pathological diagnosis and bronchoscopy for lung cancer in Aotearoa New Zealand.

IF 1.2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL Pub Date : 2024-11-08 DOI:10.26635/6965.6422
Jason Gurney, Anna Davies, James Stanley, Jesse Whitehead, Laird Cameron, Shaun Costello, Paul Dawkins, Jonathan Koea
{"title":"Equity of access to pathological diagnosis and bronchoscopy for lung cancer in Aotearoa New Zealand.","authors":"Jason Gurney, Anna Davies, James Stanley, Jesse Whitehead, Laird Cameron, Shaun Costello, Paul Dawkins, Jonathan Koea","doi":"10.26635/6965.6422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Māori are less likely to survive their lung cancer once diagnosed, but it remains unclear whether this is partially driven by poorer access to best-practice diagnostic services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined all lung cancer registrations in Aotearoa New Zealand between 2007-2019 (n=27,869) linked to national administrative health datasets and further stratified by ethnicity, tumour type and stage of disease. Using descriptive and regression analyses, we compared ethnic groups in terms of the basis of diagnosis (e.g., histology, cytology), receipt of bronchoscopy and travel distance and time to access bronchoscopy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found no differences in access to a pathological diagnosis between ethnic groups regardless of cancer type or stage. We found that Māori within the cohort were marginally more likely to access bronchoscopy than the majority European group; however, we also found that Māori had lower odds of living close to the location of their bronchoscopy, and correspondingly higher odds of living 100-200km (adjusted odds ratio [adj. OR] 1.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.26-1.69) or more than 200km away (1.36, 95% CI 1.15-1.61) than Europeans.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Interventions that aim to further support Māori to overcome the systematic and cumulative disadvantages in access to cancer care should be broadly supported and resourced.</p>","PeriodicalId":48086,"journal":{"name":"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL","volume":"137 1605","pages":"40-58"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26635/6965.6422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Māori are less likely to survive their lung cancer once diagnosed, but it remains unclear whether this is partially driven by poorer access to best-practice diagnostic services.

Methods: We examined all lung cancer registrations in Aotearoa New Zealand between 2007-2019 (n=27,869) linked to national administrative health datasets and further stratified by ethnicity, tumour type and stage of disease. Using descriptive and regression analyses, we compared ethnic groups in terms of the basis of diagnosis (e.g., histology, cytology), receipt of bronchoscopy and travel distance and time to access bronchoscopy.

Results: We found no differences in access to a pathological diagnosis between ethnic groups regardless of cancer type or stage. We found that Māori within the cohort were marginally more likely to access bronchoscopy than the majority European group; however, we also found that Māori had lower odds of living close to the location of their bronchoscopy, and correspondingly higher odds of living 100-200km (adjusted odds ratio [adj. OR] 1.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.26-1.69) or more than 200km away (1.36, 95% CI 1.15-1.61) than Europeans.

Conclusion: Interventions that aim to further support Māori to overcome the systematic and cumulative disadvantages in access to cancer care should be broadly supported and resourced.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新西兰奥特亚罗瓦地区肺癌病理诊断和支气管镜检查的公平性。
背景:毛利人在确诊肺癌后存活的可能性较低:毛利人一旦确诊患上肺癌,存活下来的可能性较低,但目前仍不清楚这是否部分归因于毛利人较难获得最佳诊断服务:我们研究了2007-2019年间新西兰奥特亚罗瓦的所有肺癌登记病例(n=27,869),这些病例与国家行政健康数据集相关联,并按种族、肿瘤类型和疾病阶段进行了进一步分层。通过描述性分析和回归分析,我们比较了各族裔群体的诊断依据(如组织学、细胞学)、接受支气管镜检查的情况以及接受支气管镜检查的旅行距离和时间:结果:我们发现,无论癌症类型或分期如何,不同种族群体在获得病理诊断方面没有差异。我们发现,队列中的毛利人接受支气管镜检查的几率略高于大多数欧洲人;但是,我们还发现,毛利人居住地距离支气管镜检查地点较近的几率低于欧洲人,而居住地距离100-200公里(调整后几率比[adj. OR] 1.46,95%置信区间[CI] 1.26-1.69)或200公里以上(1.36,95%置信区间 1.15-1.61)的几率相应高于欧洲人:旨在进一步支持毛利人克服在获得癌症治疗方面的系统性和累积性劣势的干预措施应得到广泛的支持和资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL
NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
23.50%
发文量
229
期刊最新文献
Projected increases in the prevalence of diabetes mellitus in Aotearoa New Zealand, 2020-2044. Delayed presentation of severe cervical myelopathy two years post-motorcycle accident: a case report. Does suicide in New Zealand follow a semi-lunar rhythm? How is the specialist-primary palliative care model functioning for cancer patients in the current New Zealand health system? Predatory journals: what can we do to protect their prey?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1