Bridging medical expertise in crisis: The development and implementation of a novel mobile application for Ukrainian physicians during wartime.

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Global Health Pub Date : 2024-11-08 DOI:10.7189/jogh.14.04245
Ali Dzhemiliev, Alexis G Antunez, Darya Kizub, Kateryna Potapova, Olena Tytarenko, Taras Ivanykovych, Anastasiia Prystaia, Svitlana Bielichenko, Inesa Huivaniuk, Jennifer S Davids, Nelya Melnitchouk
{"title":"Bridging medical expertise in crisis: The development and implementation of a novel mobile application for Ukrainian physicians during wartime.","authors":"Ali Dzhemiliev, Alexis G Antunez, Darya Kizub, Kateryna Potapova, Olena Tytarenko, Taras Ivanykovych, Anastasiia Prystaia, Svitlana Bielichenko, Inesa Huivaniuk, Jennifer S Davids, Nelya Melnitchouk","doi":"10.7189/jogh.14.04245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The full-scale invasion disrupted health care in Ukraine, leading to the displacement of physicians and affecting their access to subspecialist consultations. HealUA, a mobile application, was designed to provide secure and timely remote physician-to-physician consultations. We aimed to assess the implementation of the HealUA mobile application for peer-to-peer physician consultations in Ukraine during the Russian invasion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>HealUA was developed in May 2022. Security measures included user verification, privacy policies, and legal disclaimers. The application allowed physicians to submit cases and receive remote consultations from physicians in Ukraine and worldwide. We assessed the implementation of the HealUA application using Proctor's implementation outcomes framework, specifically adoption and feasibility. Adoption was measured by user downloads, characteristics of registered physicians, and case submissions. Feasibility was evaluated through clinical case response times, translation services, and technical issues.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From May 2022 to May 2024, 3861 physicians registered. The majority were from Ukraine (95%). Of 474 submitted cases, 97.3% received timely responses from other physicians. The application demonstrated prompt response times (84.6% within the first day), successful translation services, and effective resolution of technical issues.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The HealUA application achieved broad adoption across medical specialties, fostering robust clinical information exchange during the ongoing conflict. Security standards were upheld and routine technical issues were satisfactorily addressed. Future efforts will focus on broader dissemination and assessing additional implementation outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Health","volume":"14 ","pages":"04245"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11544522/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.14.04245","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The full-scale invasion disrupted health care in Ukraine, leading to the displacement of physicians and affecting their access to subspecialist consultations. HealUA, a mobile application, was designed to provide secure and timely remote physician-to-physician consultations. We aimed to assess the implementation of the HealUA mobile application for peer-to-peer physician consultations in Ukraine during the Russian invasion.

Methods: HealUA was developed in May 2022. Security measures included user verification, privacy policies, and legal disclaimers. The application allowed physicians to submit cases and receive remote consultations from physicians in Ukraine and worldwide. We assessed the implementation of the HealUA application using Proctor's implementation outcomes framework, specifically adoption and feasibility. Adoption was measured by user downloads, characteristics of registered physicians, and case submissions. Feasibility was evaluated through clinical case response times, translation services, and technical issues.

Results: From May 2022 to May 2024, 3861 physicians registered. The majority were from Ukraine (95%). Of 474 submitted cases, 97.3% received timely responses from other physicians. The application demonstrated prompt response times (84.6% within the first day), successful translation services, and effective resolution of technical issues.

Conclusions: The HealUA application achieved broad adoption across medical specialties, fostering robust clinical information exchange during the ongoing conflict. Security standards were upheld and routine technical issues were satisfactorily addressed. Future efforts will focus on broader dissemination and assessing additional implementation outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
危机中的医学知识桥梁:为战时乌克兰医生开发和实施新型移动应用程序。
背景:全面入侵扰乱了乌克兰的医疗保健,导致医生流离失所,影响了他们获得亚专科会诊的机会。HealUA是一款移动应用程序,旨在提供安全、及时的医生间远程会诊。我们的目的是评估在俄罗斯入侵期间,HealUA 移动应用程序在乌克兰用于点对点医生会诊的实施情况。方法:HealUA 于 2022 年 5 月开发完成。安全措施包括用户验证、隐私政策和法律免责声明。该应用程序允许医生提交病例,并接受乌克兰和世界各地医生的远程会诊。我们使用 Proctor 的实施成果框架评估了 HealUA 应用程序的实施情况,特别是采用率和可行性。采用率通过用户下载量、注册医生的特征和病例提交来衡量。可行性则通过临床病例响应时间、翻译服务和技术问题进行评估:从 2022 年 5 月到 2024 年 5 月,共有 3861 名医生注册。其中大部分来自乌克兰(95%)。在提交的 474 个病例中,97.3% 得到了其他医生的及时回复。该应用程序显示了及时的响应时间(84.6% 在第一天内)、成功的翻译服务以及技术问题的有效解决:HealUA 应用程序在各医学专科得到了广泛采用,在冲突期间促进了临床信息的有力交流。安全标准得到了维护,常规技术问题也得到了圆满解决。今后的工作重点将放在更广泛的推广和评估更多的实施成果上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Global Health
Journal of Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.80%
发文量
240
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Global Health is a peer-reviewed journal published by the Edinburgh University Global Health Society, a not-for-profit organization registered in the UK. We publish editorials, news, viewpoints, original research and review articles in two issues per year.
期刊最新文献
Academic vs. industry-sponsored trials: A global survey on differences, similarities, and future improvements. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a prediction model for community-based screening of active tuberculosis. Does work modify the relationship between violence and mental health among young people? Evidence from the Violence Against Children Surveys in Uganda, Nigeria and Colombia. Impact of COVID-19 on the utilisation of maternal health services in Bangladesh: A division-level analysis. Impact of scaling up health intervention coverage on reducing maternal mortality in 26 low- and middle-income countries: A modelling study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1