Plaque Removal and Gingival Bleeding Using Biodegradable Toothbrushes: Salvadora persica, Bamboo, and Nylon: A Comparative Study.

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q1 Medicine Medical Science Monitor Pub Date : 2024-11-08 DOI:10.12659/MSM.944469
Hytham N Fageeh, Manawar A Mansoor, Hammam I Fageeh, Hina N Abdul, Lujain Kh Mawkili, Shreefah M Faris, Bashayr M Zubayni, Zainab A Alfardan, Meshal Saleh Zaidan, Shankargouda Patil, Ashok Kumar Bhati
{"title":"Plaque Removal and Gingival Bleeding Using Biodegradable Toothbrushes: Salvadora persica, Bamboo, and Nylon: A Comparative Study.","authors":"Hytham N Fageeh, Manawar A Mansoor, Hammam I Fageeh, Hina N Abdul, Lujain Kh Mawkili, Shreefah M Faris, Bashayr M Zubayni, Zainab A Alfardan, Meshal Saleh Zaidan, Shankargouda Patil, Ashok Kumar Bhati","doi":"10.12659/MSM.944469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND There is little information available comparing eco-friendly products versus traditional plastic-based oral care implements. Therefore, this study was conducted to compare the plaque removal efficacy and bacterial contamination of biodegradable miswak (S. persica) toothbrushes with bamboo toothbrushes and conventional toothbrushes. MATERIAL AND METHODS This single-blinded, parallel randomized, observational comparative study comprised 30 participants aged 18-35 years. Participants were randomized into 3 groups of 10 participants each: miswak (S. persica) brush, bamboo brush, and regular toothbrush). Participants were trained on proper brushing technique. Plaque and bleeding scores were measured by Loe and Sillness and Ainamo and Bay indices, respectively, at baseline (T0), at 4 weeks (T1), and 8 weeks (T2). Microbial contamination on the bristles of all 3 brushes was also evaluated. Multigroup comparison was done using one-way ANOVA, whereas inter-group comparisons were made using post hoc Bonferroni correction. RESULTS All 3 groups had lower plaque scores at the end of 8 weeks. A statistically significant reduction in the bleeding index in the miswak group was seen from baseline to week 8, with a 16.68% reduction in bleeding sites. Similar reductions were seen in the bamboo brush (21.04%) and conventional brush (22.7%) groups. Regular toothbrushes had almost 4 times more microbial contamination than bamboo brushes and more than double the level of miswak toothbrushes. Significant difference with ANOVA test was seen among the 3 tooth brushes, with P value 0.001. CONCLUSIONS Miswak natural toothbrushes and bamboo toothbrushes can be as effective as a conventional plastic toothbrush.</p>","PeriodicalId":48888,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Monitor","volume":"30 ","pages":"e944469"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11555888/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Monitor","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.944469","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND There is little information available comparing eco-friendly products versus traditional plastic-based oral care implements. Therefore, this study was conducted to compare the plaque removal efficacy and bacterial contamination of biodegradable miswak (S. persica) toothbrushes with bamboo toothbrushes and conventional toothbrushes. MATERIAL AND METHODS This single-blinded, parallel randomized, observational comparative study comprised 30 participants aged 18-35 years. Participants were randomized into 3 groups of 10 participants each: miswak (S. persica) brush, bamboo brush, and regular toothbrush). Participants were trained on proper brushing technique. Plaque and bleeding scores were measured by Loe and Sillness and Ainamo and Bay indices, respectively, at baseline (T0), at 4 weeks (T1), and 8 weeks (T2). Microbial contamination on the bristles of all 3 brushes was also evaluated. Multigroup comparison was done using one-way ANOVA, whereas inter-group comparisons were made using post hoc Bonferroni correction. RESULTS All 3 groups had lower plaque scores at the end of 8 weeks. A statistically significant reduction in the bleeding index in the miswak group was seen from baseline to week 8, with a 16.68% reduction in bleeding sites. Similar reductions were seen in the bamboo brush (21.04%) and conventional brush (22.7%) groups. Regular toothbrushes had almost 4 times more microbial contamination than bamboo brushes and more than double the level of miswak toothbrushes. Significant difference with ANOVA test was seen among the 3 tooth brushes, with P value 0.001. CONCLUSIONS Miswak natural toothbrushes and bamboo toothbrushes can be as effective as a conventional plastic toothbrush.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用可生物降解牙刷清除牙菌斑和牙龈出血:萨尔瓦多柿、竹和尼龙牙刷:比较研究。
背景 将环保产品与传统的塑料口腔护理工具进行比较的资料很少。因此,本研究对可生物降解的miswak(柿树)牙刷与竹牙刷和传统牙刷的牙菌斑去除效果和细菌污染情况进行了比较。材料和方法 这项单盲、平行随机、观察比较研究由 30 名年龄在 18-35 岁之间的参与者参加。参与者被随机分为三组,每组 10 人:Miswak(柿树)牙刷、竹制牙刷和普通牙刷。)参与者接受了正确刷牙技巧的培训。在基线(T0)、4 周(T1)和 8 周(T2)时,分别用 Loe 和 Sillness 指数以及 Ainamo 和 Bay 指数测量牙菌斑和出血评分。此外,还对所有 3 种刷子刷毛上的微生物污染情况进行了评估。多组比较采用单因素方差分析,组间比较采用事后 Bonferroni 校正。结果 在 8 周结束时,所有 3 组的牙菌斑评分都较低。从基线到第 8 周,miswak 组的出血指数明显下降,出血部位减少了 16.68%。竹制牙刷组(21.04%)和普通牙刷组(22.7%)也有类似的下降。普通牙刷的微生物污染水平几乎是竹制牙刷的 4 倍,是 miswak 牙刷的两倍多。经方差分析检验,3 种牙刷之间存在显著差异,P 值为 0.001。结论 Miswak 天然牙刷和竹制牙刷与传统塑料牙刷一样有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Science Monitor
Medical Science Monitor MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
514
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Medical Science Monitor (MSM) established in 1995 is an international, peer-reviewed scientific journal which publishes original articles in Clinical Medicine and related disciplines such as Epidemiology and Population Studies, Product Investigations, Development of Laboratory Techniques :: Diagnostics and Medical Technology which enable presentation of research or review works in overlapping areas of medicine and technology such us (but not limited to): medical diagnostics, medical imaging systems, computer simulation of health and disease processes, new medical devices, etc. Reviews and Special Reports - papers may be accepted on the basis that they provide a systematic, critical and up-to-date overview of literature pertaining to research or clinical topics. Meta-analyses are considered as reviews. A special attention will be paid to a teaching value of a review paper. Medical Science Monitor is internationally indexed in Thomson-Reuters Web of Science, Journals Citation Report (JCR), Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI), Index Medicus MEDLINE, PubMed, PMC, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica, Chemical Abstracts CAS and Index Copernicus.
期刊最新文献
Computed Tomography Parameters for Prognosis Prediction in Non-Occlusive Mesenteric Ischemia. Optimizing Anesthetic Management for Laparoscopic Surgery: A Comprehensive Review. Impact of Prior Cesarean Delivery on Pregnancy Outcomes and Hemorrhage Risks in Complete Placenta Previa: A Decade-Long Retrospective Analysis. Analysis of Mortality Causes and Locations in Veterans with ALS: A Decade Review. Surgical Advances in the Treatment of Acromioclavicular Joint Injury: A Comprehensive Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1