The Optimized Use of a Contact-Free Continuous Monitoring System on Clinical Outcomes During COVID-19.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Patient Safety Pub Date : 2024-11-08 DOI:10.1097/PTS.0000000000001298
Alice Kim, Patricia C Dykes, Darren Scully, Paula Wolski, Calvin Franz, Stuart Lipsitz, Graham Lowenthal, Matthew Wien, David W Bates
{"title":"The Optimized Use of a Contact-Free Continuous Monitoring System on Clinical Outcomes During COVID-19.","authors":"Alice Kim, Patricia C Dykes, Darren Scully, Paula Wolski, Calvin Franz, Stuart Lipsitz, Graham Lowenthal, Matthew Wien, David W Bates","doi":"10.1097/PTS.0000000000001298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of a contact-free continuous monitoring system on clinical outcomes including unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) transfer (primary), length of stay (LOS), code blue, and mortality. A secondary aim was to evaluate the return on investment associated with implementing the contact-free continuous monitoring program during the COVID public health emergency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An interrupted time series evaluation was conducted to examine the association between the use of contact-free continuous monitoring and clinical outcomes. A cost-benefit analysis was planned to evaluate the return on investment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Use of contact-free continuous monitoring was not significantly associated with unplanned ICU transfers, deaths, ICU LOS, and or rapid response team calls. However, there were significant increases in code blue events (P = 0.02) and mean hospital LOS (P = 0.01) in the postimplementation period when compared with the preimplementation period. Due to the lack of improvement, costs were calculated but a cost-benefit analysis was not conducted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Contact-free continuous monitoring bed use during the COVID-19 public health emergency was not associated with improvements in clinical outcomes, although there was substantial confounding. Future studies should include large randomized controlled trials to control for factors not under direct experimental control including unit staffing, staff turnover, and differences in the patient population related to surges in the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":48901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001298","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of a contact-free continuous monitoring system on clinical outcomes including unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) transfer (primary), length of stay (LOS), code blue, and mortality. A secondary aim was to evaluate the return on investment associated with implementing the contact-free continuous monitoring program during the COVID public health emergency.

Methods: An interrupted time series evaluation was conducted to examine the association between the use of contact-free continuous monitoring and clinical outcomes. A cost-benefit analysis was planned to evaluate the return on investment.

Results: Use of contact-free continuous monitoring was not significantly associated with unplanned ICU transfers, deaths, ICU LOS, and or rapid response team calls. However, there were significant increases in code blue events (P = 0.02) and mean hospital LOS (P = 0.01) in the postimplementation period when compared with the preimplementation period. Due to the lack of improvement, costs were calculated but a cost-benefit analysis was not conducted.

Conclusions: Contact-free continuous monitoring bed use during the COVID-19 public health emergency was not associated with improvements in clinical outcomes, although there was substantial confounding. Future studies should include large randomized controlled trials to control for factors not under direct experimental control including unit staffing, staff turnover, and differences in the patient population related to surges in the COVID-19 pandemic.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在 COVID-19 期间优化使用非接触式连续监测系统对临床结果的影响
研究目的本研究的目的是检验非接触式持续监控系统对临床结果的影响,包括非计划重症监护病房(ICU)转院(主要)、住院时间(LOS)、蓝色代码和死亡率。另一个目的是评估在 COVID 公共卫生突发事件期间实施非接触式连续监测计划的投资回报:方法:进行了一项间断时间序列评估,以研究使用非接触式连续监测与临床结果之间的关联。计划进行成本效益分析,以评估投资回报:结果:使用非接触式连续监护仪与非计划的 ICU 转院、死亡、ICU LOS 和快速反应小组呼叫没有明显关联。然而,与实施前相比,实施后的蓝色代码事件(P = 0.02)和平均住院时间(P = 0.01)明显增加。由于没有改善,因此计算了成本,但没有进行成本效益分析:结论:在 COVID-19 公共卫生突发事件期间使用非接触式连续监测床与临床结果的改善无关,尽管存在大量混杂因素。未来的研究应包括大型随机对照试验,以控制不受实验直接控制的因素,包括科室人员配备、人员更替以及与 COVID-19 大流行激增有关的病人群体差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Safety
Journal of Patient Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
302
期刊介绍: Journal of Patient Safety (ISSN 1549-8417; online ISSN 1549-8425) is dedicated to presenting research advances and field applications in every area of patient safety. While Journal of Patient Safety has a research emphasis, it also publishes articles describing near-miss opportunities, system modifications that are barriers to error, and the impact of regulatory changes on healthcare delivery. This mix of research and real-world findings makes Journal of Patient Safety a valuable resource across the breadth of health professions and from bench to bedside.
期刊最新文献
Patient Falls in the Operating Room: The Danger of an Obese Patient on an Unlocked Operating Room Table. Decreasing Hospital-acquired Pressure Injuries During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A 5-step Quality Improvement Approach. Situational Analysis of the Medication Practices in Brazilian Hospitals: A Multicenter Study. The Relationship Between Medical Error Attitudes of Surgical Nurses and Evidence-Based Work Environment. It's Called "Informed Consent," But How "Informed" Are Patients? A Patient Perspective on Informed Consent in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Saudi Arabia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1