Impacts of Portable Air Purifiers on the Oxidative Potential and Sources of Organic Matter in Indoor PM2.5

Yixiang Wang, James J. Schauer, Yinping Zhang, Marilyn Black, Michael H. Bergin, Junfeng Zhang and Linchen He*, 
{"title":"Impacts of Portable Air Purifiers on the Oxidative Potential and Sources of Organic Matter in Indoor PM2.5","authors":"Yixiang Wang,&nbsp;James J. Schauer,&nbsp;Yinping Zhang,&nbsp;Marilyn Black,&nbsp;Michael H. Bergin,&nbsp;Junfeng Zhang and Linchen He*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsestair.4c0018710.1021/acsestair.4c00187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Organic matter (OM) is a major contributor to the oxidative potential (OP) of indoor PM<sub>2.5</sub>. Portable air purifiers equipped with high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters are known to effectively remove indoor PM<sub>2.5</sub> mass concentrations. However, their impacts on the OP and sources of indoor PM<sub>2.5</sub> OM and whether these impacts could further affect the OP of indoor PM<sub>2.5</sub> metals remain poorly understood. In a crossover trial, each of the 43 asthmatic children underwent a 2-week true filtration (HEPA + activated carbon [AC]) and sham filtration (no HEPA + no AC), with randomized order. PM<sub>2.5</sub> samples, simultaneously collected in participants’ bedrooms and outside their homes, were measured for mass concentration, composition, mass-normalized OP (OP<sub>m</sub>, OP per mass), and volume-normalized OP (OP<sub>v</sub>, OP<sub>m</sub> × mass concentration). Compared to the sham filtration, indoor PM<sub>2.5</sub> OM mass was 34% lower, OP<sub>m</sub> was 70% lower, and OP<sub>v</sub> was 80% lower during true filtration. The reduction in OM OP<sub>v</sub> was largely attributed to removing more reactive outdoor OM and indoor secondary OM. The change in OM composition also contributed to the reduced PM<sub>2.5</sub> metals’ OP<sub>m</sub>. Our results suggest that indoor air purifiers with HEPA and AC filters efficiently reduce PM<sub>2.5</sub> OP<sub>v</sub> by removing OM.</p><p >Little is known regarding how portable air purifiers affect the organic matter (OM) in indoor PM<sub>2.5</sub>. This study presents evidence showing that portable air purifiers equipped with HEPA and AC filters can effectively remove the OM’s oxidative potential by removing its mass concentration and more reactive OM species.</p>","PeriodicalId":100014,"journal":{"name":"ACS ES&T Air","volume":"1 11","pages":"1453–1462 1453–1462"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acsestair.4c00187","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS ES&T Air","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestair.4c00187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Organic matter (OM) is a major contributor to the oxidative potential (OP) of indoor PM2.5. Portable air purifiers equipped with high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters are known to effectively remove indoor PM2.5 mass concentrations. However, their impacts on the OP and sources of indoor PM2.5 OM and whether these impacts could further affect the OP of indoor PM2.5 metals remain poorly understood. In a crossover trial, each of the 43 asthmatic children underwent a 2-week true filtration (HEPA + activated carbon [AC]) and sham filtration (no HEPA + no AC), with randomized order. PM2.5 samples, simultaneously collected in participants’ bedrooms and outside their homes, were measured for mass concentration, composition, mass-normalized OP (OPm, OP per mass), and volume-normalized OP (OPv, OPm × mass concentration). Compared to the sham filtration, indoor PM2.5 OM mass was 34% lower, OPm was 70% lower, and OPv was 80% lower during true filtration. The reduction in OM OPv was largely attributed to removing more reactive outdoor OM and indoor secondary OM. The change in OM composition also contributed to the reduced PM2.5 metals’ OPm. Our results suggest that indoor air purifiers with HEPA and AC filters efficiently reduce PM2.5 OPv by removing OM.

Little is known regarding how portable air purifiers affect the organic matter (OM) in indoor PM2.5. This study presents evidence showing that portable air purifiers equipped with HEPA and AC filters can effectively remove the OM’s oxidative potential by removing its mass concentration and more reactive OM species.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
便携式空气净化器对室内 PM2.5 氧化潜能值和有机物质来源的影响
有机物(OM)是室内 PM2.5 氧化潜能(OP)的主要成因。众所周知,配备高效微粒空气过滤器(HEPA)的便携式空气净化器可以有效去除室内 PM2.5 的质量浓度。然而,人们对其对室内 PM2.5 OM 的 OP 和来源的影响以及这些影响是否会进一步影响室内 PM2.5 金属的 OP 仍知之甚少。在一项交叉试验中,43 名哮喘儿童每人都接受了为期 2 周的真正过滤(HEPA + 活性炭 [AC])和假过滤(无 HEPA + 无 AC),顺序随机。在参与者的卧室和家门口同时采集的 PM2.5 样品的质量浓度、成分、质量归一化 OP(OPm,单位质量 OP)和体积归一化 OP(OPv,OPm × 质量浓度)进行了测量。与假过滤相比,真正过滤时室内 PM2.5 OM 质量降低了 34%,OPm 降低了 70%,OPv 降低了 80%。OM OPv 的降低主要归因于去除了反应性更强的室外 OM 和室内二次 OM。OM 成分的变化也是 PM2.5 金属 OPm 降低的原因之一。我们的研究结果表明,采用高效空气过滤器和交流过滤器的室内空气净化器可通过去除有机物有效降低 PM2.5 的 OPv。本研究提供的证据表明,配备高效空气过滤器和交流过滤器的便携式空气净化器可以通过去除有机物的质量浓度和活性更高的有机物种类,有效去除有机物的氧化潜能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Editorial Masthead Issue Publication Information Atmospheric Radical Chemistry Evolution: A Chemical Scan of the Atmosphere Wildfire Seasons, Prenatal PM2.5 Exposure, and Respiratory Infections by Age 1 Year: A Population-Based Case-Control Analysis of Critical Developmental Windows Chemical Characterization of Organic Aerosol Tracers Derived from Burning Biomass Indigenous to Sub-Saharan Africa: Fresh Emissions versus Photochemical Aging
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1