Predicting Mixing: A Strategy for Integrating Machine Learning and Discrete Element Method

IF 3.8 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research Pub Date : 2024-11-03 DOI:10.1021/acs.iecr.4c0214710.1021/acs.iecr.4c02147
Sunil Kumar*, Yavnika Garg, Salma Khatoon, Praveen Dubey, Kiran Kumari and Anshu Anand*, 
{"title":"Predicting Mixing: A Strategy for Integrating Machine Learning and Discrete Element Method","authors":"Sunil Kumar*,&nbsp;Yavnika Garg,&nbsp;Salma Khatoon,&nbsp;Praveen Dubey,&nbsp;Kiran Kumari and Anshu Anand*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.iecr.4c0214710.1021/acs.iecr.4c02147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Segregation, the opposite of mixing, poses a common challenge in granular systems. Using a rotating drum as the basic mixing equipment, the fundamental focus of this study is to quantify undesirable segregation. The impact of particle level parameters (size, density, their combination, mass fraction) and system parameters (filling %, rotational speed, and baffle) on the segregation index within the rotating drum is first assessed using the discrete element method (DEM). Later, the machine learning (ML) model is applied in conjunction with DEM to expand and fill in the parameter space for particle-level parameters in a computationally efficient way, providing accurate predictions of segregation in less time. The DEM results are validated by comparing them with experimental data, ensuring their accuracy and reliability. The results show that optimal mixing is achieved when the total filling percent in a system is 36.3% while maintaining an equal proportion of particles. The highest level of mixing occurs at 60 rotations per minute, with fine particles concentrating near the drum’s core and coarser particles distributed around the periphery. The presence of 3–4 baffles optimally enhances mixing performance. Four ML models─linear regression, polynomial regression, support vector regression, and random forest (RF) regression─are trained using data from DEM simulations to predict the segregation index (SI). An error analysis is performed to pick the best model out of the four ML models. The analysis reveals that the RF model accurately predicts the SI. Using the RF model, the SI can be reliably predicted for any value of the seven features studied using DEM. An example 3D surface plot is generated by considering just two (out of 7) of the most important particle level parameters: size and density. The result shows that while both particle size and density contribute to segregation, variations in particle size appear to have a more pronounced effect on the SI compared to particle density.</p>","PeriodicalId":39,"journal":{"name":"Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research","volume":"63 45","pages":"19640–19661 19640–19661"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.iecr.4c02147","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Segregation, the opposite of mixing, poses a common challenge in granular systems. Using a rotating drum as the basic mixing equipment, the fundamental focus of this study is to quantify undesirable segregation. The impact of particle level parameters (size, density, their combination, mass fraction) and system parameters (filling %, rotational speed, and baffle) on the segregation index within the rotating drum is first assessed using the discrete element method (DEM). Later, the machine learning (ML) model is applied in conjunction with DEM to expand and fill in the parameter space for particle-level parameters in a computationally efficient way, providing accurate predictions of segregation in less time. The DEM results are validated by comparing them with experimental data, ensuring their accuracy and reliability. The results show that optimal mixing is achieved when the total filling percent in a system is 36.3% while maintaining an equal proportion of particles. The highest level of mixing occurs at 60 rotations per minute, with fine particles concentrating near the drum’s core and coarser particles distributed around the periphery. The presence of 3–4 baffles optimally enhances mixing performance. Four ML models─linear regression, polynomial regression, support vector regression, and random forest (RF) regression─are trained using data from DEM simulations to predict the segregation index (SI). An error analysis is performed to pick the best model out of the four ML models. The analysis reveals that the RF model accurately predicts the SI. Using the RF model, the SI can be reliably predicted for any value of the seven features studied using DEM. An example 3D surface plot is generated by considering just two (out of 7) of the most important particle level parameters: size and density. The result shows that while both particle size and density contribute to segregation, variations in particle size appear to have a more pronounced effect on the SI compared to particle density.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测混合:机器学习与离散元素法的整合策略
与混合相反的离析是颗粒系统中常见的难题。本研究使用旋转滚筒作为基本混合设备,其基本重点是量化不理想的偏析现象。首先使用离散元素法(DEM)评估了颗粒级参数(粒度、密度、它们的组合、质量分数)和系统参数(填充率、转速和挡板)对转鼓内离析指数的影响。随后,将机器学习(ML)模型与 DEM 结合使用,以高效计算的方式扩展并填充颗粒级参数的参数空间,从而在更短的时间内提供准确的偏析预测。通过将 DEM 结果与实验数据进行比较,对其进行了验证,以确保其准确性和可靠性。结果表明,当系统中的总填充率为 36.3%,同时保持颗粒比例相等时,混合效果最佳。每分钟旋转 60 转时混合程度最高,细颗粒集中在转鼓核心附近,粗颗粒则分布在外围。3-4 块挡板可优化混合性能。利用 DEM 模拟数据训练了四种 ML 模型--线性回归、多项式回归、支持向量回归和随机森林 (RF) 回归,以预测析出指数 (SI)。通过误差分析,从四个 ML 模型中选出最佳模型。分析结果表明,RF 模型能准确预测 SI。使用 RF 模型,可以可靠地预测使用 DEM 研究的七个特征中任何值的 SI。仅考虑两个最重要的颗粒级参数(共 7 个):粒度和密度,就生成了三维曲面图示例。结果表明,虽然粒度和密度都会造成偏析,但与粒度密度相比,粒度变化对 SI 的影响似乎更为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1467
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: ndustrial & Engineering Chemistry, with variations in title and format, has been published since 1909 by the American Chemical Society. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research is a weekly publication that reports industrial and academic research in the broad fields of applied chemistry and chemical engineering with special focus on fundamentals, processes, and products.
期刊最新文献
Multifaceted Roles of Additives in Regulating Crystal Growth: A Case of Acephate Graph-Based Modeling and Molecular Dynamics for Ion Activity Coefficient Prediction in Polymeric Ion-Exchange Membranes Study on the Thermal Behavior of Mixtures of Ammonium Nitrate and Micronutrient Chelates with Potential toward Enhancing the Efficiency of Precision Agriculture Macro-microreactor-Based Process Intensification for Achievement of High-Mixing-Performance, Low-Pressure-Drop, and High-Throughput Liquid–Liquid Homogeneous Chemical Processes Enhancing Reactive Microemulsion Processes: Dynamic Optimization and Cyclic Semibatch Operation for the Reductive Amination of Undecanal in a Mini-Plant
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1