Evaluating disparities in air pollution as a function of ethnicity, deprivation and sectoral emissions in England

IF 10.3 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environment International Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1016/j.envint.2024.109146
Nathan R. Gray, Alastair C. Lewis, Sarah J. Moller
{"title":"Evaluating disparities in air pollution as a function of ethnicity, deprivation and sectoral emissions in England","authors":"Nathan R. Gray, Alastair C. Lewis, Sarah J. Moller","doi":"10.1016/j.envint.2024.109146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Macro-scale distribution of air pollution concentrations is influenced by factors including geography, weather, industry, transport and regulation. Pollution sources are unevenly distributed, with some communities disproportionately impacted by higher emissions. This study separates the effects of deprivation from ethnicity as factors that influence proximity to pollution sources. We combine recent decadal census data (2021) on socioeconomic deprivation and detailed population ethnicity at fine scales (Lower Super Output layer Area, LSOA n = 1600 people) with a 1×1 km sector-resolved atmospheric emissions inventory for NO<sub>x</sub> and primary PM<sub>2.5</sub> in England. All 24 minoritised ethnic groups studied experienced higher average local NO<sub>x</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> emissions than socio-economically matched populations in the majority ‘White: English, Welsh, Scottish, Northern Irish or British‘ ethnic group. Chinese, Arab and Bangladeshi communities experienced the largest disparity in NO<sub>x</sub>, with weighted emissions 100 %, 91 %, 89 % higher than white populations of matched deprivation status. Bangladeshi, Pakistani and Roma groups experienced on average 40 %, 40 %, 36 % higher PM<sub>2.5</sub> emissions locally than matched white groups. For NO<sub>x</sub> the largest contributors leading to disparity, were road transport (48 %), domestic combustion (23 %) and industry (15 %). For PM<sub>2.5</sub> the greatest contributors to disparity were domestic combustion (53 %), road transport (19 %), and industry (11 %). Living near to road transport and in city centres are frequently cited as primary drivers of ethnicity and deprivation-based disparities, however the analysis identifies that industrial, domestic and off-road sources create issues of the same magnitude, and disparities remain in suburban settings, smaller towns and some rural areas.","PeriodicalId":308,"journal":{"name":"Environment International","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment International","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2024.109146","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Macro-scale distribution of air pollution concentrations is influenced by factors including geography, weather, industry, transport and regulation. Pollution sources are unevenly distributed, with some communities disproportionately impacted by higher emissions. This study separates the effects of deprivation from ethnicity as factors that influence proximity to pollution sources. We combine recent decadal census data (2021) on socioeconomic deprivation and detailed population ethnicity at fine scales (Lower Super Output layer Area, LSOA n = 1600 people) with a 1×1 km sector-resolved atmospheric emissions inventory for NOx and primary PM2.5 in England. All 24 minoritised ethnic groups studied experienced higher average local NOx and PM2.5 emissions than socio-economically matched populations in the majority ‘White: English, Welsh, Scottish, Northern Irish or British‘ ethnic group. Chinese, Arab and Bangladeshi communities experienced the largest disparity in NOx, with weighted emissions 100 %, 91 %, 89 % higher than white populations of matched deprivation status. Bangladeshi, Pakistani and Roma groups experienced on average 40 %, 40 %, 36 % higher PM2.5 emissions locally than matched white groups. For NOx the largest contributors leading to disparity, were road transport (48 %), domestic combustion (23 %) and industry (15 %). For PM2.5 the greatest contributors to disparity were domestic combustion (53 %), road transport (19 %), and industry (11 %). Living near to road transport and in city centres are frequently cited as primary drivers of ethnicity and deprivation-based disparities, however the analysis identifies that industrial, domestic and off-road sources create issues of the same magnitude, and disparities remain in suburban settings, smaller towns and some rural areas.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估英格兰空气污染与种族、贫困和部门排放之间的差异
空气污染浓度的宏观分布受地理、天气、工业、运输和监管等因素的影响。污染源分布不均,一些社区受较高排放的影响尤为严重。本研究将影响污染源远近的因素--贫困和种族--的影响区分开来。我们将最近十年的人口普查数据(2021 年)与英格兰氮氧化物和原生 PM2.5 的 1×1 千米分区大气排放清单相结合,这些数据涉及社会经济贫困程度和详细的细粒度人口种族(LSOA n = 1600 人)。所研究的 24 个少数族裔群体的当地氮氧化物和 PM2.5 平均排放量均高于社会经济条件相匹配的多数 "白人 "群体:英格兰、威尔士、苏格兰、北爱尔兰或英国 "族裔群体。华人、阿拉伯人和孟加拉人社区的氮氧化物排放量差距最大,加权排放量分别比贫困状况匹配的白人高出 100%、91% 和 89%。孟加拉人、巴基斯坦人和罗姆人群体的 PM2.5 排放量比匹配的白人群体平均高出 40%、40% 和 36%。就氮氧化物而言,造成差异的最大因素是道路交通(48%)、家庭燃烧(23%)和工业(15%)。对于 PM2.5,造成差异的最大因素是家庭燃烧(53%)、道路交通(19%)和工业(11%)。居住在道路交通附近和市中心经常被认为是造成种族和贫困差异的主要原因,但分析表明,工业、家庭和非道路来源造成的问题程度相同,郊区、小城镇和一些农村地区仍然存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environment International
Environment International 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
21.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
734
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Health publishes manuscripts focusing on critical aspects of environmental and occupational medicine, including studies in toxicology and epidemiology, to illuminate the human health implications of exposure to environmental hazards. The journal adopts an open-access model and practices open peer review. It caters to scientists and practitioners across all environmental science domains, directly or indirectly impacting human health and well-being. With a commitment to enhancing the prevention of environmentally-related health risks, Environmental Health serves as a public health journal for the community and scientists engaged in matters of public health significance concerning the environment.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to “SDHi fungicides: An example of mitotoxic pesticides targeting the succinate dehydrogenase complex” [Environ. Int. 180 (2023) 108219] Analysis of the stereoselective fate and toxicity of penflufen in the water-sediment system for risk reduction Uncovering global risk to human and ecosystem health from pesticides in agricultural surface water using a machine learning approach Low dose exposure to dioxins alters hepatic energy metabolism and steatotic liver disease development in a sex-specific manner Seasonal dynamics of the phage-bacterium linkage and associated antibiotic resistome in airborne PM2.5 of urban areas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1