Multimodal ultrasound plus tumor markers demonstrates a high value in enhanced diagnosis of breast cancer.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL American journal of translational research Pub Date : 2024-10-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.62347/QVCI6027
Na Li, Ming Li, Fengsheng Zhou
{"title":"Multimodal ultrasound plus tumor markers demonstrates a high value in enhanced diagnosis of breast cancer.","authors":"Na Li, Ming Li, Fengsheng Zhou","doi":"10.62347/QVCI6027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the diagnostic value of multimodal ultrasound combined with tumor markers in breast cancer (BC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 198 patients with breast lesions treated at the Affiliated Wuxi People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University between May 2020 and May 2023. All patients underwent multimodal ultrasound and tumor marker testing. Among the 198 patients, 88 patients were pathologically diagnosed with benign disease (benign group) and 110 patients were pathologically diagnosed with malignant disease (malignant group). With the pathological results as the gold standard, the benign and malignant results from different diagnostic methods were compared, focusing on specificity, sensitivity and accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The areas under the curves (AUCs) of carbohydrate antigen 153 (CA153), CA125, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) for diagnosing BC were 0.810, 0.812, and 0.790, respectively. When these tumor markers were used in combination for diagnosing BC, the AUC increased to 0.928. The AUC of multimodal ultrasound alone in diagnosing BC was 0.845. Additionally, the AUC of multimodal ultrasound combined with tumor markers in diagnosing BC reached 0.971, with the corresponding specificity, sensitivity and accuracy of 90.00%, 94.43% and 91.92%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with early BC, the combination of multimodal ultrasound and tumor marker detection significantly improves the accuracy of diagnosing benign and malignant breast lesions compared to using either modality alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":7731,"journal":{"name":"American journal of translational research","volume":"16 10","pages":"5497-5506"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11558377/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of translational research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/QVCI6027","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine the diagnostic value of multimodal ultrasound combined with tumor markers in breast cancer (BC).

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 198 patients with breast lesions treated at the Affiliated Wuxi People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University between May 2020 and May 2023. All patients underwent multimodal ultrasound and tumor marker testing. Among the 198 patients, 88 patients were pathologically diagnosed with benign disease (benign group) and 110 patients were pathologically diagnosed with malignant disease (malignant group). With the pathological results as the gold standard, the benign and malignant results from different diagnostic methods were compared, focusing on specificity, sensitivity and accuracy.

Results: The areas under the curves (AUCs) of carbohydrate antigen 153 (CA153), CA125, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) for diagnosing BC were 0.810, 0.812, and 0.790, respectively. When these tumor markers were used in combination for diagnosing BC, the AUC increased to 0.928. The AUC of multimodal ultrasound alone in diagnosing BC was 0.845. Additionally, the AUC of multimodal ultrasound combined with tumor markers in diagnosing BC reached 0.971, with the corresponding specificity, sensitivity and accuracy of 90.00%, 94.43% and 91.92%, respectively.

Conclusion: In patients with early BC, the combination of multimodal ultrasound and tumor marker detection significantly improves the accuracy of diagnosing benign and malignant breast lesions compared to using either modality alone.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多模态超声加肿瘤标记物在增强乳腺癌诊断方面具有很高的价值。
目的:确定多模态超声联合肿瘤标记物对乳腺癌(BC)的诊断价值:方法:对2020年5月至2023年5月期间在南京医科大学附属无锡人民医院接受治疗的198例乳腺病变患者进行回顾性分析:对2020年5月至2023年5月期间在南京医科大学附属无锡人民医院接受治疗的198例乳腺病变患者进行回顾性分析。所有患者均接受了多模态超声和肿瘤标志物检测。在198例患者中,88例经病理诊断为良性疾病(良性组),110例经病理诊断为恶性疾病(恶性组)。以病理结果为金标准,对不同诊断方法得出的良性和恶性结果进行比较,重点关注特异性、敏感性和准确性:碳水化合物抗原 153(CA153)、CA125 和癌胚抗原(CEA)诊断 BC 的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为 0.810、0.812 和 0.790。当这些肿瘤标记物联合用于诊断 BC 时,AUC 增加到 0.928。单独使用多模态超声诊断 BC 的 AUC 为 0.845。此外,多模态超声联合肿瘤标志物诊断 BC 的 AUC 达到 0.971,相应的特异性、敏感性和准确性分别为 90.00%、94.43% 和 91.92%:结论:对于早期乳腺良恶性肿瘤患者,联合使用多模态超声和肿瘤标记物检测与单独使用其中一种方法相比,能显著提高诊断乳腺良恶性病变的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of translational research
American journal of translational research ONCOLOGY-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
自引率
0.00%
发文量
552
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
The antimicrobial effect of Curcuma longa and Allium sativum decoction in rats explains its utility in wound care. Assessment of body composition-related imaging parameters indicative of sarcopenia in Chinese patients with Crohn's disease: correlation with disease severity and biologic efficacy. Role of coagulation indices in assessinghypertensive disorders in pregnancy and predicting delivery outcomes. Assessment of frailty status in patients with acute cerebral infarction and their relationship with serum markers. Serum bisphenol S levels are associated with decreased ovarian reserve function: a single-center study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1