Prognostic factors in acute hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage: impact of minimally invasive puncture and drainage.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL American journal of translational research Pub Date : 2024-10-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.62347/PQPP5715
Dianwei Li, Ming Wei, Shengxiang Wu, Lei Zhang, Zhenzhou Zhang
{"title":"Prognostic factors in acute hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage: impact of minimally invasive puncture and drainage.","authors":"Dianwei Li, Ming Wei, Shengxiang Wu, Lei Zhang, Zhenzhou Zhang","doi":"10.62347/PQPP5715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the prognostic factors in patients with acute hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (HICH) undergoing minimally invasive puncture and drainage, providing scientific evidence to enhance clinical treatment strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 350 patients with acute HICH treated at Gansu Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine and the First People's Hospital of Lanzhou City from March 2017 to January 2024. Patients were divided into two groups based on surgical method: the control group (n = 211) received traditional craniotomy, while the observation group (n = 139) underwent minimally invasive puncture and drainage. Functional scores, inflammatory markers, clinical efficacy, surgical time, first hematoma clearance rate, and hospitalization duration were compared between the groups. Patients were classified into poor prognosis (Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score < 3) and improved prognosis (GOS score ≥ 3) groups. Logistic regression analysis identified independent risk factors for poor prognosis and examined their interaction with patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperative functional scores (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, GOS score, and Barthel Index) in the observation group were significantly better than those in the control group (all P < 0.001). Inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α)) were significantly lower post-treatment in the observation group compared to those in the control group (all P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression identified age (P = 0.003, OR = 0.573), time from onset to admission (P = 0.026, OR = 0.535), duration of hypertension (P = 0.006, OR = 1.766), and postoperative IL-6 levels (P = 0.048, OR = 1.870) as independent risk factors for poor prognosis. Prognosis was statistically associated with age (P = 0.040, OR = 0.978), time from onset to admission (P = 0.022, OR = 0.956), duration of hypertension (P = 0.022, OR = 1.085), and post-treatment IL-6 levels (P = 0.043, OR = 1.030).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Minimally invasive puncture and drainage offer superior neurological recovery, reduced inflammatory response, and improved long-term prognosis compared to traditional craniotomy in the treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage.</p>","PeriodicalId":7731,"journal":{"name":"American journal of translational research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11558406/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of translational research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/PQPP5715","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the prognostic factors in patients with acute hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (HICH) undergoing minimally invasive puncture and drainage, providing scientific evidence to enhance clinical treatment strategies.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 350 patients with acute HICH treated at Gansu Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine and the First People's Hospital of Lanzhou City from March 2017 to January 2024. Patients were divided into two groups based on surgical method: the control group (n = 211) received traditional craniotomy, while the observation group (n = 139) underwent minimally invasive puncture and drainage. Functional scores, inflammatory markers, clinical efficacy, surgical time, first hematoma clearance rate, and hospitalization duration were compared between the groups. Patients were classified into poor prognosis (Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score < 3) and improved prognosis (GOS score ≥ 3) groups. Logistic regression analysis identified independent risk factors for poor prognosis and examined their interaction with patient outcomes.

Results: Postoperative functional scores (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, GOS score, and Barthel Index) in the observation group were significantly better than those in the control group (all P < 0.001). Inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α)) were significantly lower post-treatment in the observation group compared to those in the control group (all P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression identified age (P = 0.003, OR = 0.573), time from onset to admission (P = 0.026, OR = 0.535), duration of hypertension (P = 0.006, OR = 1.766), and postoperative IL-6 levels (P = 0.048, OR = 1.870) as independent risk factors for poor prognosis. Prognosis was statistically associated with age (P = 0.040, OR = 0.978), time from onset to admission (P = 0.022, OR = 0.956), duration of hypertension (P = 0.022, OR = 1.085), and post-treatment IL-6 levels (P = 0.043, OR = 1.030).

Conclusion: Minimally invasive puncture and drainage offer superior neurological recovery, reduced inflammatory response, and improved long-term prognosis compared to traditional craniotomy in the treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性高血压性脑出血的预后因素:微创穿刺和引流术的影响。
目的分析接受微创穿刺引流术的急性高血压脑出血(HICH)患者的预后因素,为加强临床治疗策略提供科学依据:对2017年3月至2024年1月在甘肃省中医院和兰州市第一人民医院接受治疗的350例急性HICH患者进行回顾性分析。根据手术方法将患者分为两组:对照组(n = 211)接受传统开颅手术,观察组(n = 139)接受微创穿刺引流术。比较两组患者的功能评分、炎症指标、临床疗效、手术时间、血肿首次清除率和住院时间。患者被分为预后不良组(格拉斯哥结果量表(GOS)评分<3分)和预后改善组(GOS评分≥3分)。逻辑回归分析确定了预后不良的独立风险因素,并研究了这些因素与患者预后的相互作用:结果:观察组的术后功能评分(美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分、GOS 评分和 Barthel 指数)明显优于对照组(所有 P <0.001)。与对照组相比,观察组治疗后的炎症指标(C反应蛋白(CRP)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)和肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α))明显降低(均为 P <0.001)。多变量逻辑回归确定年龄(P = 0.003,OR = 0.573)、发病至入院时间(P = 0.026,OR = 0.535)、高血压持续时间(P = 0.006,OR = 1.766)和术后 IL-6 水平(P = 0.048,OR = 1.870)为预后不良的独立危险因素。预后与年龄(P = 0.040,OR = 0.978)、发病至入院时间(P = 0.022,OR = 0.956)、高血压持续时间(P = 0.022,OR = 1.085)和治疗后 IL-6 水平(P = 0.043,OR = 1.030)有统计学关系:结论:与传统开颅手术相比,微创穿刺引流治疗高血压性脑出血的神经功能恢复更佳,炎症反应更少,长期预后更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of translational research
American journal of translational research ONCOLOGY-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
自引率
0.00%
发文量
552
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
The antimicrobial effect of Curcuma longa and Allium sativum decoction in rats explains its utility in wound care. Assessment of body composition-related imaging parameters indicative of sarcopenia in Chinese patients with Crohn's disease: correlation with disease severity and biologic efficacy. Role of coagulation indices in assessinghypertensive disorders in pregnancy and predicting delivery outcomes. Assessment of frailty status in patients with acute cerebral infarction and their relationship with serum markers. Serum bisphenol S levels are associated with decreased ovarian reserve function: a single-center study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1