Interventional Strategies for Children with Progressive Pulmonary Hypertension Despite Optimal Therapy. An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline.

IF 19.3 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1164/rccm.202410-1901ST
Don Hayes, Ann L Jennerich, Ryan D Coleman, Eric Abston, Gregory T Adamson, John T Berger, Sarah P Cohen, David S Cooper, Pirooz Eghtesady, Francis Fynn-Thompson, R Mark Grady, Stephanie M Hon, Charles W Hoopes, Teresa Jewell, Hayley Lewthwaite, Michelle F Liu, David C McGiffin, Mary P Mullen, Athar M Qureshi, David L S Morales
{"title":"Interventional Strategies for Children with Progressive Pulmonary Hypertension Despite Optimal Therapy. An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline.","authors":"Don Hayes, Ann L Jennerich, Ryan D Coleman, Eric Abston, Gregory T Adamson, John T Berger, Sarah P Cohen, David S Cooper, Pirooz Eghtesady, Francis Fynn-Thompson, R Mark Grady, Stephanie M Hon, Charles W Hoopes, Teresa Jewell, Hayley Lewthwaite, Michelle F Liu, David C McGiffin, Mary P Mullen, Athar M Qureshi, David L S Morales","doi":"10.1164/rccm.202410-1901ST","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulmonary hypertension in children often progresses despite optimal therapy. This document provides an evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the management of children with progressive pulmonary hypertension despite optimal therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multidisciplinary panel identified pertinent questions regarding the management of children with pulmonary hypertension that has progressed despite optimal therapy, conducted systematic reviews of the relevant literature, and applied the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to develop clinical recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After reviewing the research evidence, the panel considered the balance of desirable (benefits) and undesirable (harms and burdens) effects of the interventions in each proposed question. Valuation of our main outcomes was also considered, along with resources required, equity, acceptability, and feasibility. Recommendations were developed for or against interventional strategies specific to children with pulmonary hypertension that has progressed despite optimal therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although there is a growing population of children with pulmonary hypertension, there is a striking lack of empirical evidence regarding management of those whose disease has progressed despite optimal pharmacotherapy. The panel formulated and provided the rationale for clinical recommendations for or against interventional strategies based on this limited empirical evidence, coupled with expert opinion, to aid clinicians in the management of these complex pediatric patients. In addition, we identified important areas for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":7664,"journal":{"name":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":19.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202410-1901ST","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary hypertension in children often progresses despite optimal therapy. This document provides an evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the management of children with progressive pulmonary hypertension despite optimal therapy.

Methods: A multidisciplinary panel identified pertinent questions regarding the management of children with pulmonary hypertension that has progressed despite optimal therapy, conducted systematic reviews of the relevant literature, and applied the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to develop clinical recommendations.

Results: After reviewing the research evidence, the panel considered the balance of desirable (benefits) and undesirable (harms and burdens) effects of the interventions in each proposed question. Valuation of our main outcomes was also considered, along with resources required, equity, acceptability, and feasibility. Recommendations were developed for or against interventional strategies specific to children with pulmonary hypertension that has progressed despite optimal therapy.

Conclusions: Although there is a growing population of children with pulmonary hypertension, there is a striking lack of empirical evidence regarding management of those whose disease has progressed despite optimal pharmacotherapy. The panel formulated and provided the rationale for clinical recommendations for or against interventional strategies based on this limited empirical evidence, coupled with expert opinion, to aid clinicians in the management of these complex pediatric patients. In addition, we identified important areas for future research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童在接受最佳治疗后仍出现进展性肺动脉高压的介入治疗策略。美国胸科学会官方临床实践指南。
背景:尽管采用了最佳治疗方法,儿童肺动脉高压仍经常会进展。本文件提供了一份以证据为基础的临床实践指南,用于治疗虽经最佳治疗但病情仍在进展的肺动脉高压患儿:方法:一个多学科专家小组确定了在接受最佳治疗后仍有进展的肺动脉高压患儿管理方面的相关问题,对相关文献进行了系统回顾,并采用建议、评估、发展和评价分级法(GRADE)制定了临床建议:在对研究证据进行审查后,专家小组考虑了每个建议问题中干预措施的理想效果(益处)和不理想效果(危害和负担)之间的平衡。同时还考虑了主要结果的价值以及所需资源、公平性、可接受性和可行性。针对尽管接受了最佳治疗但病情仍有进展的肺动脉高压患儿,我们提出了支持或反对干预策略的建议:尽管肺动脉高压患儿的数量在不断增加,但对于那些在接受了最佳药物治疗后病情仍在发展的患儿,其治疗方法却明显缺乏经验证据。专家组根据这些有限的经验证据,结合专家意见,制定了支持或反对干预策略的临床建议,并提供了相关理由,以帮助临床医生管理这些复杂的儿科患者。此外,我们还确定了未来研究的重要领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
27.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
1313
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine focuses on human biology and disease, as well as animal studies that contribute to the understanding of pathophysiology and treatment of diseases that affect the respiratory system and critically ill patients. Papers that are solely or predominantly based in cell and molecular biology are published in the companion journal, the American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology. The Journal also seeks to publish clinical trials and outstanding review articles on areas of interest in several forms. The State-of-the-Art review is a treatise usually covering a broad field that brings bench research to the bedside. Shorter reviews are published as Critical Care Perspectives or Pulmonary Perspectives. These are generally focused on a more limited area and advance a concerted opinion about care for a specific process. Concise Clinical Reviews provide an evidence-based synthesis of the literature pertaining to topics of fundamental importance to the practice of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. Images providing advances or unusual contributions to the field are published as Images in Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep Medicine and the Sciences. A recent trend and future direction of the Journal has been to include debates of a topical nature on issues of importance in pulmonary and critical care medicine and to the membership of the American Thoracic Society. Other recent changes have included encompassing works from the field of critical care medicine and the extension of the editorial governing of journal policy to colleagues outside of the United States of America. The focus and direction of the Journal is to establish an international forum for state-of-the-art respiratory and critical care medicine.
期刊最新文献
Similar Weaning Success Rate with High-Intensity and Sham Inspiratory Muscle Training: A Randomized Controlled Trial (IMweanT). Best in Class: Immunoglobulin G as a Treatable Trait for Exacerbation Prevention in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Decoding Sex Differences in Right Ventricular Function through BMPR1A. Quantitative Lung Ultrasound and Pediatric Critical Care: Any Excuse Not to Use It? Simple vs Extended Lung Ultrasound Score to Guide Surfactant Replacement in the First 24h of Life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1