{"title":"Effects of different types of intermittent fasting on metabolic outcomes: an umbrella review and network meta-analysis.","authors":"Yu-En Chen, Hui-Li Tsai, Yu-Kang Tu, Ling-Wei Chen","doi":"10.1186/s12916-024-03716-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intermittent fasting (IF) holds promise for enhancing metabolic health. However, the optimum IF forms and their superiority over continuous energy restriction (CER) remain unclear due to disconnected findings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane databases for meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the association between IF and metabolic health outcomes. Subsequently, we performed an umbrella review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to evaluate the efficacy of different forms of IF (time-restricted eating (TRE), alternate-day fasting (ADF), and 5:2 diet (regular eating for 5 days and energy restriction for 2 days per week)) compared to CER and usual diets on metabolic health outcomes. To assess the certainty of both direct and indirect estimates, we employed the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) approach. Additionally, we calculated the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) for each dietary strategy to determine their ranking in terms of metabolic health benefits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten of the best and non-redundant meta-analysis studies, involving 153 original studies and 9846 participants, were included. When considering direct evidence only, all IF forms significantly reduced body weight compared to usual diets. In NMA incorporating indirect evidence, all IF regimens also significantly reduced body weight compared to usual diets. In the SUCRA of NMA, IF ranked higher than usual diets or CER in 85.4% and 56.1% of the outcomes, respectively. ADF had the highest overall ranking for improving metabolic health (ranked first: 64.3%, ranked second: 14.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, all IF forms demonstrate potentials to improve metabolic health, with ADF appearing to produce better outcomes across investigated outcomes. Further high-quality trials are warranted to confirm the (relative) efficacy of IF on metabolic health.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO (record no: CRD42022302690).</p>","PeriodicalId":9188,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559166/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-024-03716-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Intermittent fasting (IF) holds promise for enhancing metabolic health. However, the optimum IF forms and their superiority over continuous energy restriction (CER) remain unclear due to disconnected findings.
Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane databases for meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the association between IF and metabolic health outcomes. Subsequently, we performed an umbrella review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to evaluate the efficacy of different forms of IF (time-restricted eating (TRE), alternate-day fasting (ADF), and 5:2 diet (regular eating for 5 days and energy restriction for 2 days per week)) compared to CER and usual diets on metabolic health outcomes. To assess the certainty of both direct and indirect estimates, we employed the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) approach. Additionally, we calculated the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) for each dietary strategy to determine their ranking in terms of metabolic health benefits.
Results: Ten of the best and non-redundant meta-analysis studies, involving 153 original studies and 9846 participants, were included. When considering direct evidence only, all IF forms significantly reduced body weight compared to usual diets. In NMA incorporating indirect evidence, all IF regimens also significantly reduced body weight compared to usual diets. In the SUCRA of NMA, IF ranked higher than usual diets or CER in 85.4% and 56.1% of the outcomes, respectively. ADF had the highest overall ranking for improving metabolic health (ranked first: 64.3%, ranked second: 14.3%).
Conclusions: Overall, all IF forms demonstrate potentials to improve metabolic health, with ADF appearing to produce better outcomes across investigated outcomes. Further high-quality trials are warranted to confirm the (relative) efficacy of IF on metabolic health.
期刊介绍：
BMC Medicine is an open access, transparent peer-reviewed general medical journal. It is the flagship journal of the BMC series and publishes outstanding and influential research in various areas including clinical practice, translational medicine, medical and health advances, public health, global health, policy, and general topics of interest to the biomedical and sociomedical professional communities. In addition to research articles, the journal also publishes stimulating debates, reviews, unique forum articles, and concise tutorials. All articles published in BMC Medicine are included in various databases such as Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAS, Citebase, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, OAIster, SCImago, Scopus, SOCOLAR, and Zetoc.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
