Diagnostic test accuracy of the Fungitell serum (1→3)-β-D-glucan assay for the diagnosis of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 8.5 1区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Clinical Microbiology and Infection Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1016/j.cmi.2024.11.004
Connor Prosty , Owen Dan Luo , Roy Khalaf , Olivier Del Corpo , Emily G. McDonald , Todd C. Lee
{"title":"Diagnostic test accuracy of the Fungitell serum (1→3)-β-D-glucan assay for the diagnosis of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Connor Prosty ,&nbsp;Owen Dan Luo ,&nbsp;Roy Khalaf ,&nbsp;Olivier Del Corpo ,&nbsp;Emily G. McDonald ,&nbsp;Todd C. Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.cmi.2024.11.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The diagnosis of <em>Pneumocystis jirovecii</em> pneumonia (PCP) can be challenging because of diagnostic tests that are imperfect and/or invasive. The Fungitell serum (1 → 3)-β-D-glucan (BDG) assay is a noninvasive blood test studied for PCP; however, the manufacturer-recommended cut-off of 80 pg/mL is not well validated for this disease.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the diagnostic test accuracy of the Fungitell BDG assay for the diagnosis of PCP.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>.</div></div><div><h3>Data sources</h3><div>A search strategy of MEDLINE and Embase from a previous meta-analysis on BDG was updated to 31 January 2024.</div></div><div><h3>Study eligibility criteria</h3><div>Observational studies.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Patients with risk factors for PCP.</div></div><div><h3>Test</h3><div>Fungitell BDG assay.</div></div><div><h3>Reference standard</h3><div>One or more of lung biopsy, bronchoalveolar lavage, induced sputum, or nasopharyngeal swab specimens tested for PCP by histopathology, microscopy using immunofluorescence or staining, or PCR.</div></div><div><h3>Assessment of risk of bias</h3><div>The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool.</div></div><div><h3>Methods of data synthesis</h3><div>Diagnostic test accuracy data of the Fungitell serum BDG assay across all reported cut-offs were pooled by meta-analysis. We then evaluated a categorical approach using &lt;80 pg/mL as a rule-out threshold and ≥400 pg/mL as a rule-in threshold.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 26 articles were included comprising 5111 patients and 1150 PCP cases. At the conventional cut-off of 80 pg/mL, the overall pooled sensitivity and specificity were 83.5% (95% 95% CI, 72.8–90.6) and 75.5% (95% CI, 66.0–83.0), respectively. At a pretest probability of &lt;20% and a BDG &lt;80 pg/mL, the post-test probability would be &lt;5% (negative predictive value &gt; 95%). At 400 pg/mL, sensitivity was reduced to 63.5% (95% CI, 45.8–78.1) with specificity increased to 93.6% (95% CI, 88.6–96.5). At a pretest probability of 47.5%, a BDG &gt;400 pg/mL would have a post-test probability of &gt;90%.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>A categorical approach using &lt;80 pg/mL to rule-out and &gt;400 pg/mL to rule-in PCP may allow for a more nuanced interpretation based on pretest probability. More accurate estimates of pretest probability and further external validation are required.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10444,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","volume":"31 4","pages":"Pages 542-550"},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1198743X24005305","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The diagnosis of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) can be challenging because of diagnostic tests that are imperfect and/or invasive. The Fungitell serum (1 → 3)-β-D-glucan (BDG) assay is a noninvasive blood test studied for PCP; however, the manufacturer-recommended cut-off of 80 pg/mL is not well validated for this disease.

Objectives

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the diagnostic test accuracy of the Fungitell BDG assay for the diagnosis of PCP.

Methods

.

Data sources

A search strategy of MEDLINE and Embase from a previous meta-analysis on BDG was updated to 31 January 2024.

Study eligibility criteria

Observational studies.

Participants

Patients with risk factors for PCP.

Test

Fungitell BDG assay.

Reference standard

One or more of lung biopsy, bronchoalveolar lavage, induced sputum, or nasopharyngeal swab specimens tested for PCP by histopathology, microscopy using immunofluorescence or staining, or PCR.

Assessment of risk of bias

The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool.

Methods of data synthesis

Diagnostic test accuracy data of the Fungitell serum BDG assay across all reported cut-offs were pooled by meta-analysis. We then evaluated a categorical approach using <80 pg/mL as a rule-out threshold and ≥400 pg/mL as a rule-in threshold.

Results

A total of 26 articles were included comprising 5111 patients and 1150 PCP cases. At the conventional cut-off of 80 pg/mL, the overall pooled sensitivity and specificity were 83.5% (95% 95% CI, 72.8–90.6) and 75.5% (95% CI, 66.0–83.0), respectively. At a pretest probability of <20% and a BDG <80 pg/mL, the post-test probability would be <5% (negative predictive value > 95%). At 400 pg/mL, sensitivity was reduced to 63.5% (95% CI, 45.8–78.1) with specificity increased to 93.6% (95% CI, 88.6–96.5). At a pretest probability of 47.5%, a BDG >400 pg/mL would have a post-test probability of >90%.

Discussion

A categorical approach using <80 pg/mL to rule-out and >400 pg/mL to rule-in PCP may allow for a more nuanced interpretation based on pretest probability. More accurate estimates of pretest probability and further external validation are required.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fungitell 血清(1→3)-β-D-葡聚糖测定诊断肺孢子菌肺炎的检验准确性:系统综述与元分析》。
背景:由于诊断测试不完善和/或具有侵入性,因此诊断肺孢子虫肺炎(PCP)具有挑战性。Fungitell血清(1→3)-β-D-葡聚糖(BDG)测定是一种针对PCP的非侵入性血液检验;然而,制造商推荐的80pg/mL临界值并没有得到很好的验证:我们进行了一项系统综述和荟萃分析,以确定 Fungitell BDG 检测法诊断五氯苯酚的准确性:数据来源 从之前关于 BDG 的荟萃分析中提取的 MEDLINE 和 Embase 搜索策略已更新至 2024 年 1 月 31 日。检测方法 Fungitell BDG 检测法。参考标准 肺活检、支气管肺泡灌洗液、诱导痰或鼻咽拭子标本中的一种或多种通过组织病理学、使用免疫荧光或染色的显微镜检查或聚合酶链反应对五氯苯酚进行检测。偏倚风险评估 QUADAS-2 工具。数据综合方法 通过荟萃分析汇集了Fungitell血清BDG测定在所有报告临界值上的诊断检测准确性数据。结果:共纳入 26 篇文章,包括 5111 名患者和 1150 个 PCP 病例。在 80pg/mL 的常规临界值下,汇总的总体灵敏度和特异性分别为 83.5%(95% 置信区间 [95%CI]=72.8-90.6 )和 75.5%(95%CI=66.0-83.0)。检测前概率为 95%)。400pg/mL 时,灵敏度降至 63.5%(95%CI=45.8-78.1),特异性增至 93.6%(95%CI=88.6-96.5)。在检测前概率为47.5%的情况下,BDG>400pg/mL的检测后概率将>90%:讨论:使用 400pg/mL 的分类方法来排除 PCP,可根据检测前概率做出更细致的解释。需要对检测前概率进行更准确的估计,并进一步进行外部验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
441
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Microbiology and Infection (CMI) is a monthly journal published by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. It focuses on peer-reviewed papers covering basic and applied research in microbiology, infectious diseases, virology, parasitology, immunology, and epidemiology as they relate to therapy and diagnostics.
期刊最新文献
Systematic investigation of baseline nosocomial transmission of tuberculosis in the Kyrgyz Republic, Central Asia Real-world effectiveness of influenza vaccination and subsequent waning in a tropical setting: a retrospective cohort study Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis and disseminated toxoplasmosis after stem cell transplant Avoiding resistance development to newer drugs: open research lines On the shoulders of a giant: an appraisal of the legacy of Dr. Gerald P Bodey to infectious diseases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1