If You Give a Therapist a Network: A Qualitative Analysis of Therapists' Reactions to Their Patients' EMA-Based Network Models

IF 3.2 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Clinical psychology & psychotherapy Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI:10.1002/cpp.70013
Mila Hall, Annika A. Wagner, Paloma V. Scherner, Julian A. Rubel
{"title":"If You Give a Therapist a Network: A Qualitative Analysis of Therapists' Reactions to Their Patients' EMA-Based Network Models","authors":"Mila Hall,&nbsp;Annika A. Wagner,&nbsp;Paloma V. Scherner,&nbsp;Julian A. Rubel","doi":"10.1002/cpp.70013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Network models hold much promise for use in the form of personalized feedback, which the TheraNet Project aims to investigate. In the present study, we share therapists' first reactions to patient network models based on ecological momentary assessment (EMA) data.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Therapists (<i>N</i> = 24) were taught to interpret the network models based on their patient's data. They were provided with concrete use suggestions at the end of the workshop. The workshops were analysed using descriptive qualitative content analysis. The resulting codes were then grouped thematically.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Therapists spoke about using the networks for “case conceptualization”, “therapy planning”, and “psychoeducation”, but also commented on the “study design”. Before the concrete suggestions, therapists most frequently voiced thoughts on its uses for “case conceptualization”. After the suggestions, “psychoeducation” was mentioned most frequently.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Therapists intuitively connected network models to case conceptualizations. Once concrete suggestions were provided, therapists more frequently discussed networks as psychoeducative tools.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"31 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpp.70013","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.70013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Network models hold much promise for use in the form of personalized feedback, which the TheraNet Project aims to investigate. In the present study, we share therapists' first reactions to patient network models based on ecological momentary assessment (EMA) data.

Method

Therapists (N = 24) were taught to interpret the network models based on their patient's data. They were provided with concrete use suggestions at the end of the workshop. The workshops were analysed using descriptive qualitative content analysis. The resulting codes were then grouped thematically.

Results

Therapists spoke about using the networks for “case conceptualization”, “therapy planning”, and “psychoeducation”, but also commented on the “study design”. Before the concrete suggestions, therapists most frequently voiced thoughts on its uses for “case conceptualization”. After the suggestions, “psychoeducation” was mentioned most frequently.

Conclusions

Therapists intuitively connected network models to case conceptualizations. Once concrete suggestions were provided, therapists more frequently discussed networks as psychoeducative tools.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如果给治疗师一个网络:治疗师对患者基于 EMA 的网络模型反应的定性分析。
目的:网络模型在个性化反馈形式中大有可为,TheraNet 项目旨在对此进行研究。在本研究中,我们分享了治疗师对基于生态瞬间评估(EMA)数据的患者网络模型的第一反应:方法:治疗师(24 人)学习如何根据患者数据解释网络模型。工作坊结束时向他们提供了具体的使用建议。工作坊采用描述性定性内容分析法进行分析。然后按主题对所得代码进行分组:治疗师们谈到了将网络用于 "病例概念化"、"治疗计划 "和 "心理教育",但也对 "研究设计 "发表了意见。在提出具体建议之前,治疗师最常表达的想法是将网络用于 "病例概念化"。在提出建议之后,"心理教育 "被提及的频率最高:治疗师凭直觉将网络模型与病例概念化联系起来。结论:治疗师直观地将网络模型与病例概念化联系在一起。一旦提供了具体建议,治疗师就会更频繁地讨论网络作为心理教育工具的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy aims to keep clinical psychologists and psychotherapists up to date with new developments in their fields. The Journal will provide an integrative impetus both between theory and practice and between different orientations within clinical psychology and psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy will be a forum in which practitioners can present their wealth of expertise and innovations in order to make these available to a wider audience. Equally, the Journal will contain reports from researchers who want to address a larger clinical audience with clinically relevant issues and clinically valid research.
期刊最新文献
Presence and Impact of Adverse Childhood Experiences and Reflective Functioning on Aggression in Adults With Antisocial Behaviour Do Therapists Know When Their Clients Deteriorate? An Investigation of Therapists' Ability to Estimate and Predict Client Change During and After Psychotherapy Resilience and Religious Coping in Libyan Survivors of Hurricane Daniele If You Give a Therapist a Network: A Qualitative Analysis of Therapists' Reactions to Their Patients' EMA-Based Network Models Intrusive Thoughts and Images in Health Anxiety: Rates, Characteristics, and Responses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1