The Need for Institutional Policies for Innovative Therapy: Existing Approaches and Key Elements.

IF 7.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Critical Care Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI:10.1097/CCM.0000000000006517
Emily Rao, Christine Grady, David Wendler
{"title":"The Need for Institutional Policies for Innovative Therapy: Existing Approaches and Key Elements.","authors":"Emily Rao, Christine Grady, David Wendler","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Innovative therapy is common in many areas of medicine. Yet, it is unknown whether medical centers have policies to ensure innovative therapy is conducted appropriately.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We contacted three informants at leading U.S. medical centers to determine whether the center has a policy for innovative therapy and, if so, what requirements the policies include and whether the policies lack any important elements.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Existing policies and published recommendations.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Our search found that 46 of 58 responding centers (79%) do not have a policy for innovative therapy. Of the ten policies available for review, half lack requirements to report patient outcomes, and half do not explicitly coordinate innovative therapy with research.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A majority of leading U.S. medical centers do not have a policy for innovative therapy. In addition, existing policies lack important elements, especially with respect to reporting patient outcomes and coordinating innovative therapy with research. Based on the existing policies and recommendations in the literature, we thus identify eight key elements that should be included in policies for innovative therapy. Future research should assess whether these elements can be feasibly implemented and whether, in practice, they offer patients appropriate protection.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006517","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Innovative therapy is common in many areas of medicine. Yet, it is unknown whether medical centers have policies to ensure innovative therapy is conducted appropriately.

Design: We contacted three informants at leading U.S. medical centers to determine whether the center has a policy for innovative therapy and, if so, what requirements the policies include and whether the policies lack any important elements.

Setting: Existing policies and published recommendations.

Patients: None.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: Our search found that 46 of 58 responding centers (79%) do not have a policy for innovative therapy. Of the ten policies available for review, half lack requirements to report patient outcomes, and half do not explicitly coordinate innovative therapy with research.

Conclusions: A majority of leading U.S. medical centers do not have a policy for innovative therapy. In addition, existing policies lack important elements, especially with respect to reporting patient outcomes and coordinating innovative therapy with research. Based on the existing policies and recommendations in the literature, we thus identify eight key elements that should be included in policies for innovative therapy. Future research should assess whether these elements can be feasibly implemented and whether, in practice, they offer patients appropriate protection.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
制定创新疗法机构政策的必要性:现有方法和关键要素。
目的:创新疗法在许多医学领域都很常见。然而,医疗中心是否制定了相关政策以确保创新疗法的正确实施,目前尚不得而知:设计:我们联系了美国主要医疗中心的三位信息提供者,以确定医疗中心是否制定了创新疗法政策,如果制定了,政策中包括哪些要求,政策中是否缺少任何重要元素:现有政策和公布的建议:患者:无:测量和主要结果我们的搜索发现,在 58 个响应中心中,有 46 个(79%)没有制定创新疗法政策。在可供查阅的十项政策中,有一半没有要求报告患者的治疗结果,有一半没有明确协调创新疗法与研究:结论:大多数美国领先的医疗中心都没有制定创新疗法政策。此外,现有政策缺乏重要内容,尤其是在报告患者疗效和协调创新疗法与研究方面。因此,根据现有政策和文献中的建议,我们确定了创新疗法政策中应包含的八个关键要素。未来的研究应评估这些要素是否可以实施,以及在实践中是否能为患者提供适当的保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care Medicine
Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
728
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient. Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.
期刊最新文献
Performance of the Healthy Aging Brain Care Monitor Self Report in Monitoring Post-Intensive Care Syndrome Among Acute Respiratory Failure Survivors. The Need for Institutional Policies for Innovative Therapy: Existing Approaches and Key Elements. Vascular Complications After Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support: A CT Study. The Impact of Multi-Institution Datasets on the Generalizability of Machine Learning Prediction Models in the ICU. ICU-Electroencephalogram Unit Improves Outcome in Status Epilepticus Patients: A Retrospective Before-After Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1