The eACT study design and methods: A sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trial of A novel adherence intervention for youth with epilepsy

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Contemporary clinical trials Pub Date : 2024-11-10 DOI:10.1016/j.cct.2024.107739
Janelle L. Wagner , Anup D. Patel , Heather Huszti , Matthew Schmidt , Gigi Smith , Sonal Bhatia , Shanna M. Guilfoyle , Amy Lang , Stacy Buschhaus , Shannon Williams , Jessica Ardo , Marie Davidian , Avani C. Modi
{"title":"The eACT study design and methods: A sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trial of A novel adherence intervention for youth with epilepsy","authors":"Janelle L. Wagner ,&nbsp;Anup D. Patel ,&nbsp;Heather Huszti ,&nbsp;Matthew Schmidt ,&nbsp;Gigi Smith ,&nbsp;Sonal Bhatia ,&nbsp;Shanna M. Guilfoyle ,&nbsp;Amy Lang ,&nbsp;Stacy Buschhaus ,&nbsp;Shannon Williams ,&nbsp;Jessica Ardo ,&nbsp;Marie Davidian ,&nbsp;Avani C. Modi","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Epilepsy is a common, chronic pediatric neurological condition predominately treated with anti-seizure medications (ASMs) to control or reduce seizures. Approximately 60 % of youth with epilepsy demonstrate suboptimal adherence to their ASM. This paper describes the methodology, recruitment, design, and baseline participant characteristics of a sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trial (SMART) designed to test the effectiveness of a behavioral health intervention to improve adherence in families of young children with epilepsy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using a two-stage SMART, youth ages 2–12 years old with newly diagnosed epilepsy and their families were enrolled. Following an 8-week run-in phase, families with ≤95 % adherence were randomized to control (education + automated digital reminders) or intervention (education + automated digital reminders + individualized feedback) arms. After three months, families in the intervention group who remained non-adherent (i.e., ≤ 95 %) were re-randomized to 1) continue with same intervention or 2) receive two telehealth problem-solving sessions with an interventionist over the next two months. Study measures were completed at baseline, 8-, 14-, and 20-months post-baseline.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the <em>n</em> = 466 ethnically and racially diverse study participants, <em>n</em> = 268 participants were non-adherent and were randomized. The primary outcome was electronically monitored ASM adherence at post-intervention, while secondary outcomes included seizure freedom, health care utilization, and epilepsy-specific health-related quality of life.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Novel aspects of the trial design (e.g., sequential, recruitment of racial and ethnic diverse youth), modifications to the protocol related to the COVID-19 pandemic and evolving socio-political and medical climate, as well as recruitment and retention challenges are discussed.</div><div><span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> Number: <span><span>NCT03817229</span><svg><path></path></svg></span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":"147 ","pages":"Article 107739"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551714424003227","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Epilepsy is a common, chronic pediatric neurological condition predominately treated with anti-seizure medications (ASMs) to control or reduce seizures. Approximately 60 % of youth with epilepsy demonstrate suboptimal adherence to their ASM. This paper describes the methodology, recruitment, design, and baseline participant characteristics of a sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trial (SMART) designed to test the effectiveness of a behavioral health intervention to improve adherence in families of young children with epilepsy.

Methods

Using a two-stage SMART, youth ages 2–12 years old with newly diagnosed epilepsy and their families were enrolled. Following an 8-week run-in phase, families with ≤95 % adherence were randomized to control (education + automated digital reminders) or intervention (education + automated digital reminders + individualized feedback) arms. After three months, families in the intervention group who remained non-adherent (i.e., ≤ 95 %) were re-randomized to 1) continue with same intervention or 2) receive two telehealth problem-solving sessions with an interventionist over the next two months. Study measures were completed at baseline, 8-, 14-, and 20-months post-baseline.

Results

Of the n = 466 ethnically and racially diverse study participants, n = 268 participants were non-adherent and were randomized. The primary outcome was electronically monitored ASM adherence at post-intervention, while secondary outcomes included seizure freedom, health care utilization, and epilepsy-specific health-related quality of life.

Conclusions

Novel aspects of the trial design (e.g., sequential, recruitment of racial and ethnic diverse youth), modifications to the protocol related to the COVID-19 pandemic and evolving socio-political and medical climate, as well as recruitment and retention challenges are discussed.
ClinicalTrials.gov Number: NCT03817229
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
eACT 研究的设计和方法:一项针对青少年癫痫患者的新型坚持治疗干预的连续、多重分配、随机试验。
背景:癫痫是一种常见的慢性儿科神经系统疾病,主要通过抗癫痫药物(ASM)来控制或减少癫痫发作。约 60% 的青少年癫痫患者对抗癫痫药物的依从性不佳。本文介绍了一项顺序、多重分配、随机试验(SMART)的方法、招募、设计和基线参与者特征,该试验旨在测试行为健康干预对改善癫痫幼儿家庭依从性的有效性:方法:采用两阶段 SMART,招募 2-12 岁新确诊癫痫的青少年及其家庭。在为期8周的磨合阶段后,依从性低于95%的家庭被随机分配到对照组(教育+自动数字提醒)或干预组(教育+自动数字提醒+个性化反馈)。三个月后,干预组中仍未坚持治疗的家庭(即坚持率低于 95%)被重新随机分配为:1)继续接受相同的干预;或 2)在接下来的两个月中接受两次由干预专家提供的远程医疗问题解决课程。在基线、基线后 8 个月、14 个月和 20 个月完成研究测量:在 n = 466 名不同民族和种族的研究参与者中,n = 268 名参与者未坚持治疗,他们被随机分组。主要结果是干预后电子监测的ASM依从性,次要结果包括癫痫发作自由度、医疗保健利用率以及与癫痫相关的健康生活质量:讨论了试验设计的新颖之处(如顺序、招募不同种族和民族的青少年)、与 COVID-19 大流行和不断变化的社会政治和医疗环境相关的方案修改,以及招募和留住人员方面的挑战:NCT03817229。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
281
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Contemporary Clinical Trials is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes manuscripts pertaining to all aspects of clinical trials, including, but not limited to, design, conduct, analysis, regulation and ethics. Manuscripts submitted should appeal to a readership drawn from disciplines including medicine, biostatistics, epidemiology, computer science, management science, behavioural science, pharmaceutical science, and bioethics. Full-length papers and short communications not exceeding 1,500 words, as well as systemic reviews of clinical trials and methodologies will be published. Perspectives/commentaries on current issues and the impact of clinical trials on the practice of medicine and health policy are also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to 'Integrative data analysis of clinical trials network studies to examine the impact of psychosocial treatments for Black people who use cocaine: Study protocol' [Contemporary Clinical Trials 133 (2023) 107329]. Increasing screening for breast cancer using a randomized evaluation of electronic health record nudges: Design and rationale of the I-screen clinical trial. An evaluation of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (CBT-AR) in a youth outpatient eating disorders service: A protocol paper. Characteristics of VA hospitals by participation status in a large pragmatic embedded clinical trial. Effect of donepezil on bone metabolism among older adults with Alzheimer's disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1