Design and methodology of a randomized clinical trial of quetiapine to reduce central nervous system polypharmacy in veterans with postconcussive syndrome symptoms

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Contemporary clinical trials Pub Date : 2024-11-10 DOI:10.1016/j.cct.2024.107741
Muhammad R. Baig , Gerardo Villarreal , Lizette Aviles , Adeel Meraj , Betsy Davis , Eric C. Meyer , Casey Straud , Stacey Young-McCaughan , Alan L. Peterson , John D. Roache
{"title":"Design and methodology of a randomized clinical trial of quetiapine to reduce central nervous system polypharmacy in veterans with postconcussive syndrome symptoms","authors":"Muhammad R. Baig ,&nbsp;Gerardo Villarreal ,&nbsp;Lizette Aviles ,&nbsp;Adeel Meraj ,&nbsp;Betsy Davis ,&nbsp;Eric C. Meyer ,&nbsp;Casey Straud ,&nbsp;Stacey Young-McCaughan ,&nbsp;Alan L. Peterson ,&nbsp;John D. Roache","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Lack of evidence to guide medication treatments for mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) in veterans too often results in polypharmacy practices attempting to provide symptomatic relief from multiple postconcussive syndrome symptoms. Therefore, the field needs to find an effective medication that reduces the burden of postconcussive symptoms without complicating the treatment burden of veterans. This clinical trial seeks to determine whether switching veterans to quetiapine monotherapy (intervention) is superior to continuing to receive treatment as usual (TAU, control) polypharmacy for veterans with symptoms of postconcussive syndrome and posttraumatic stress disorder who are receiving rehabilitation treatment for mTBI. This study will test the conceptual mediation model hypothesis that quetiapine monotherapy may enhance recovery from mTBI by (1) increasing engagement in rehabilitation services, and/or (2) reducing the adverse effects of TAU polypharmacy. This study will enroll 146 patients from two Veterans Administration Medical Centers into a 12- week phase III, randomized, pragmatic clinical trial comparing outcomes from treatment with quetiapine monotherapy and TAU. Quetiapine will be cross tapered up to a maximum dose of 200 mg (as tolerated) as other medications are discontinued. The primary outcome measures are postconcussive syndrome symptoms (Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory), functional disability (World Health Organization Disability Assessment), and quality of life (World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment). Overall, this study aims to determine whether quetiapine monotherapy is superior to TAU polypharmacy and improves the quality of life for veterans with comorbid postconcussive syndrome and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms who are receiving rehabilitation treatment for mTBI.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":"147 ","pages":"Article 107741"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551714424003240","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lack of evidence to guide medication treatments for mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) in veterans too often results in polypharmacy practices attempting to provide symptomatic relief from multiple postconcussive syndrome symptoms. Therefore, the field needs to find an effective medication that reduces the burden of postconcussive symptoms without complicating the treatment burden of veterans. This clinical trial seeks to determine whether switching veterans to quetiapine monotherapy (intervention) is superior to continuing to receive treatment as usual (TAU, control) polypharmacy for veterans with symptoms of postconcussive syndrome and posttraumatic stress disorder who are receiving rehabilitation treatment for mTBI. This study will test the conceptual mediation model hypothesis that quetiapine monotherapy may enhance recovery from mTBI by (1) increasing engagement in rehabilitation services, and/or (2) reducing the adverse effects of TAU polypharmacy. This study will enroll 146 patients from two Veterans Administration Medical Centers into a 12- week phase III, randomized, pragmatic clinical trial comparing outcomes from treatment with quetiapine monotherapy and TAU. Quetiapine will be cross tapered up to a maximum dose of 200 mg (as tolerated) as other medications are discontinued. The primary outcome measures are postconcussive syndrome symptoms (Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory), functional disability (World Health Organization Disability Assessment), and quality of life (World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment). Overall, this study aims to determine whether quetiapine monotherapy is superior to TAU polypharmacy and improves the quality of life for veterans with comorbid postconcussive syndrome and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms who are receiving rehabilitation treatment for mTBI.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
喹硫平随机临床试验的设计与方法,以减少有震颤后综合征症状的退伍军人中枢神经系统的多重药物治疗。
由于缺乏指导退伍军人轻度脑外伤(mTBI)药物治疗的证据,退伍军人往往会尝试使用多种药物来缓解多种撞击后综合征症状。因此,该领域需要找到一种有效的药物,既能减轻撞击后症状的负担,又不会加重退伍军人的治疗负担。本临床试验旨在确定,对于有撞击后综合征和创伤后应激障碍症状并正在接受创伤后应激障碍康复治疗的退伍军人来说,让他们改用喹硫平单药治疗(干预)是否优于继续接受常规治疗(TAU,对照组)。本研究将验证概念中介模型假设,即奎硫平单药治疗可通过(1)提高康复服务的参与度,和/或(2)减少TAU多药治疗的不良反应,从而促进mTBI的康复。这项研究将从两家退伍军人管理局医疗中心招募 146 名患者,进行为期 12 周的 III 期随机实用临床试验,比较喹硫平单药治疗和 TAU 治疗的效果。在停用其他药物的同时,喹硫平将交叉减量,最大剂量为200毫克(视耐受情况而定)。主要结果测量指标包括:震后综合征症状(神经行为症状量表)、功能性残疾(世界卫生组织残疾评估)和生活质量(世界卫生组织生活质量评估)。总之,本研究旨在确定喹硫平单药治疗是否优于TAU多药治疗,以及是否能改善正在接受创伤后应激障碍康复治疗的合并有撞击后综合征和创伤后应激障碍症状的退伍军人的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
281
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Contemporary Clinical Trials is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes manuscripts pertaining to all aspects of clinical trials, including, but not limited to, design, conduct, analysis, regulation and ethics. Manuscripts submitted should appeal to a readership drawn from disciplines including medicine, biostatistics, epidemiology, computer science, management science, behavioural science, pharmaceutical science, and bioethics. Full-length papers and short communications not exceeding 1,500 words, as well as systemic reviews of clinical trials and methodologies will be published. Perspectives/commentaries on current issues and the impact of clinical trials on the practice of medicine and health policy are also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to 'Integrative data analysis of clinical trials network studies to examine the impact of psychosocial treatments for Black people who use cocaine: Study protocol' [Contemporary Clinical Trials 133 (2023) 107329]. A new way to address missing data in late-stage clinical trials. A peer support intervention in patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT): The STEPP randomized pilot trial design and methods outline. An evaluation of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (CBT-AR) in a youth outpatient eating disorders service: A protocol paper. Characteristics of VA hospitals by participation status in a large pragmatic embedded clinical trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1