Evocation of positive memories as complement to trauma-focused cognitive-behavioural therapy for intimate partner violence against women.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY European Journal of Psychotraumatology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1080/20008066.2024.2419699
María Crespo, M José Hernández-Lloreda, Carlos Hornillos, Alejandro Miguel-Alvaro, Silvia Sánchez-Ferrer, Ana A Antón
{"title":"Evocation of positive memories as complement to trauma-focused cognitive-behavioural therapy for intimate partner violence against women.","authors":"María Crespo, M José Hernández-Lloreda, Carlos Hornillos, Alejandro Miguel-Alvaro, Silvia Sánchez-Ferrer, Ana A Antón","doi":"10.1080/20008066.2024.2419699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Focusing on positive memories as a complement to trauma-focused interventions for intimate partner violence against women (IPVAW) could contribute to enhancing the recovery from trauma with the development of a more integrated and emotionally modulated autobiographical narrative.<b>Objective:</b> To test the effectiveness of a trauma-focused cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) tailored for IPVAW that incorporates the evocation of positive memories.<b>Methods:</b> Female survivors of IPVAW entered a randomized controlled trial comparing trauma-focused CBT for IPVAW (CBT; <i>n</i> = 35) to a version that incorporates the evocation of positive memories (CBT-M+; <i>n</i> = 44) and to a waitlist (WL; <i>n</i> = 12) control group. Pre and post measures were obtained for: posttraumatic stress, meaning of trauma, affect, emotional regulation, associated symptoms, self-concept and overall functioning.<b>Results:</b> A total of 43.04% of women who entered treatment dropped out, without significant treatment differences. Pre-post changes were not significant for the WL; both treatments resulted in significant improvements, with good effect sizes, for posttraumatic stress (<i>g</i> = 0.78 and <i>g</i> = 1.00 for CBT and CBT-M+, respectively), meaning of trauma, affect, associated symptoms, self-concept and overall functioning, but not in emotional regulation. There were no significant differences between CBT and CBT-M+ in the direct comparisons; however, the effect sizes showed better effects of CBT for centrality of the IPVAW, whereas they favoured CBT-M+ for PTSD, depression, self-esteem and impairment measures. No clinically significant change was reached for the WL, while both treatments significantly reduced the percentage of women with PTSD and self-esteem problems; additionally, the percentage of women with depression and impairment problems in the CBT-M+ group was significantly decreased.<b>Conclusions:</b> Although there were few differences between both treatments, CBT-M+ seemed to have a greater effect, pointing to the potential of the inclusion of the evocation of positive memories that should be further researched.</p>","PeriodicalId":12055,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","volume":"15 1","pages":"2419699"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559032/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2024.2419699","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Focusing on positive memories as a complement to trauma-focused interventions for intimate partner violence against women (IPVAW) could contribute to enhancing the recovery from trauma with the development of a more integrated and emotionally modulated autobiographical narrative.Objective: To test the effectiveness of a trauma-focused cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) tailored for IPVAW that incorporates the evocation of positive memories.Methods: Female survivors of IPVAW entered a randomized controlled trial comparing trauma-focused CBT for IPVAW (CBT; n = 35) to a version that incorporates the evocation of positive memories (CBT-M+; n = 44) and to a waitlist (WL; n = 12) control group. Pre and post measures were obtained for: posttraumatic stress, meaning of trauma, affect, emotional regulation, associated symptoms, self-concept and overall functioning.Results: A total of 43.04% of women who entered treatment dropped out, without significant treatment differences. Pre-post changes were not significant for the WL; both treatments resulted in significant improvements, with good effect sizes, for posttraumatic stress (g = 0.78 and g = 1.00 for CBT and CBT-M+, respectively), meaning of trauma, affect, associated symptoms, self-concept and overall functioning, but not in emotional regulation. There were no significant differences between CBT and CBT-M+ in the direct comparisons; however, the effect sizes showed better effects of CBT for centrality of the IPVAW, whereas they favoured CBT-M+ for PTSD, depression, self-esteem and impairment measures. No clinically significant change was reached for the WL, while both treatments significantly reduced the percentage of women with PTSD and self-esteem problems; additionally, the percentage of women with depression and impairment problems in the CBT-M+ group was significantly decreased.Conclusions: Although there were few differences between both treatments, CBT-M+ seemed to have a greater effect, pointing to the potential of the inclusion of the evocation of positive memories that should be further researched.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
唤起积极记忆作为针对亲密伴侣暴力侵害妇女行为的创伤认知行为疗法的补充。
背景:将积极记忆作为针对亲密伴侣暴力侵害妇女行为(IPVAW)的创伤干预措施的补充,有助于通过发展更完整、情绪更稳定的自传体叙事来促进创伤康复:目的:测试针对亲密伴侣暴力侵害妇女行为(IPVAW)的创伤认知行为疗法(CBT)的有效性,该疗法结合了唤起积极记忆的方法:遭受暴力侵害的女性幸存者参加了一项随机对照试验,该试验比较了针对遭受暴力侵害的创伤认知行为疗法(CBT;n = 35)和包含唤起积极记忆的版本(CBT-M+;n = 44),以及候补名单对照组(WL;n = 12)。对创伤后压力、创伤的意义、情感、情绪调节、相关症状、自我概念和整体功能进行了前后测量:共有 43.04% 的妇女退出了治疗,但治疗效果差异不大。WL 治疗前后的变化不显著;两种治疗方法都能显著改善创伤后应激反应(CBT 和 CBT-M+ 的 g = 0.78 和 g = 1.00)、创伤的意义、情感、相关症状、自我概念和整体功能,但在情绪调节方面效果不显著。在直接比较中,CBT 和 CBT-M+ 之间没有明显差异;但是,效应大小显示,CBT 在 IPVAW 中心性方面的效果更好,而在创伤后应激障碍、抑郁、自尊和损伤测量方面,CBT-M+ 的效果更好。在 WL 方面,两种治疗方法都没有达到临床意义上的显著变化,但在创伤后应激障碍和自尊问题上,两种治疗方法都显著降低了妇女的比例;此外,在 CBT-M+ 组中,抑郁和损伤问题的妇女比例也显著降低:结论:虽然两种治疗方法之间的差异不大,但 CBT-M+ 似乎有更大的效果,这表明唤起积极记忆的方法具有潜力,值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
153
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) is a peer-reviewed open access interdisciplinary journal owned by the European Society of Traumatic Stress Studies (ESTSS). The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) aims to engage scholars, clinicians and researchers in the vital issues of how to understand, prevent and treat the consequences of stress and trauma, including but not limited to, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depressive disorders, substance abuse, burnout, and neurobiological or physical consequences, using the latest research or clinical experience in these areas. The journal shares ESTSS’ mission to advance and disseminate scientific knowledge about traumatic stress. Papers may address individual events, repeated or chronic (complex) trauma, large scale disasters, or violence. Being open access, the European Journal of Psychotraumatology is also evidence of ESTSS’ stand on free accessibility of research publications to a wider community via the web. The European Journal of Psychotraumatology seeks to attract contributions from academics and practitioners from diverse professional backgrounds, including, but not restricted to, those in mental health, social sciences, and health and welfare services. Contributions from outside Europe are welcome. The journal welcomes original basic and clinical research articles that consolidate and expand the theoretical and professional basis of the field of traumatic stress; Review articles including meta-analyses; short communications presenting new ideas or early-stage promising research; study protocols that describe proposed or ongoing research; case reports examining a single individual or event in a real‑life context; clinical practice papers sharing experience from the clinic; letters to the Editor debating articles already published in the Journal; inaugural Lectures; conference abstracts and book reviews. Both quantitative and qualitative research is welcome.
期刊最新文献
Atrophy in the supramarginal gyrus associated with impaired cognitive inhibition in grieving Chinese Shidu parents Dynamic networks of complex posttraumatic stress disorder and depression among college students with childhood trauma: insights from cross-sectional and cross-lagged panel network analysis A novel intervention for acute stress reaction: exploring the feasibility of ReSTART among Norwegian soldiers Wellbeing and illbeing in women exposed to physical and sexual violence during peripregnancy: a population-based longitudinal study Childhood-related PTSD: the role of cognitions in EMDR and imagery rescripting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1