Discrimination of thrombus types in ischemic stroke using Dual-Energy CT

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING European Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2024-11-10 DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111832
Guisong Hou , Haoming Chen , Li’an Luo , Lin Hou , Tuanyu Lin , Yuan Liu
{"title":"Discrimination of thrombus types in ischemic stroke using Dual-Energy CT","authors":"Guisong Hou ,&nbsp;Haoming Chen ,&nbsp;Li’an Luo ,&nbsp;Lin Hou ,&nbsp;Tuanyu Lin ,&nbsp;Yuan Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study explores the clinical utility of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) in discriminating thrombus types in ischemic stroke.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients with acute ischemic stroke who underwent brain DECT non-contrast scanning and brain CT perfusion (CTP) before thrombectomy were included, and the thrombus composition was analyzed by postoperative pathology. DECT data was conducted to reconstruct polychromatic images and effective atomic number images. Computed tomography (CT) values, effective atomic numbers, and spectral curve slopes of the thrombus were measured and calculated. Thrombus attenuation increase was obtained from CTP data. Parameters were compared between red blood cell (RBC)-dominant thrombi and fibrin/platelet (F/P)-dominant thrombi. Thresholds, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were analyzed to distinguish these thrombi. The associations between DECT parameters and proportion of RBCs were analyzed by Spearman’s correlation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Pathological analysis of 42 enrolled patients revealed 24 cases of RBC-dominant thrombi and 18 cases of F/P-dominant thrombi. Effective atomic numbers, spectral curve slopes, and polychromatic images CT values were significantly higher in the RBC-dominant thrombi group compared with the F/P-dominant thrombi group. Although the average thrombus attenuation increase was greater in the F/P-dominant thrombi group, this difference was not statistically significant. Among the DECT parameters, polychromatic images CT values had the greatest AUC at 0.924 (0.848–0.999) for discriminating RBC-dominant and F/P-dominant thrombi, with a threshold of 59 HU, sensitivity of 79.2 %, and specificity of 94.4 %. The combined diagnostic AUC reached 0.938 (0.863–1.012), with 87.5 % sensitivity and 94.4 % specificity. DECT polychromatic images CT values, effective atomic numbers, and spectral curve slopes were significantly correlated with proportion of RBCs (r = 0.673, 0.574, and 0.571, all p &lt; 0.01).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>DECT non-contrast scan parameters are associated with thrombus composition, which could be effective in distinguishing between RBC-dominant and F/P-dominant thrombi.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":"181 ","pages":"Article 111832"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X24005485","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study explores the clinical utility of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) in discriminating thrombus types in ischemic stroke.

Methods

Patients with acute ischemic stroke who underwent brain DECT non-contrast scanning and brain CT perfusion (CTP) before thrombectomy were included, and the thrombus composition was analyzed by postoperative pathology. DECT data was conducted to reconstruct polychromatic images and effective atomic number images. Computed tomography (CT) values, effective atomic numbers, and spectral curve slopes of the thrombus were measured and calculated. Thrombus attenuation increase was obtained from CTP data. Parameters were compared between red blood cell (RBC)-dominant thrombi and fibrin/platelet (F/P)-dominant thrombi. Thresholds, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were analyzed to distinguish these thrombi. The associations between DECT parameters and proportion of RBCs were analyzed by Spearman’s correlation.

Results

Pathological analysis of 42 enrolled patients revealed 24 cases of RBC-dominant thrombi and 18 cases of F/P-dominant thrombi. Effective atomic numbers, spectral curve slopes, and polychromatic images CT values were significantly higher in the RBC-dominant thrombi group compared with the F/P-dominant thrombi group. Although the average thrombus attenuation increase was greater in the F/P-dominant thrombi group, this difference was not statistically significant. Among the DECT parameters, polychromatic images CT values had the greatest AUC at 0.924 (0.848–0.999) for discriminating RBC-dominant and F/P-dominant thrombi, with a threshold of 59 HU, sensitivity of 79.2 %, and specificity of 94.4 %. The combined diagnostic AUC reached 0.938 (0.863–1.012), with 87.5 % sensitivity and 94.4 % specificity. DECT polychromatic images CT values, effective atomic numbers, and spectral curve slopes were significantly correlated with proportion of RBCs (r = 0.673, 0.574, and 0.571, all p < 0.01).

Conclusion

DECT non-contrast scan parameters are associated with thrombus composition, which could be effective in distinguishing between RBC-dominant and F/P-dominant thrombi.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用双能量 CT 鉴别缺血性中风的血栓类型。
目的本研究探讨了双能计算机断层扫描(DECT)在缺血性脑卒中血栓类型判别中的临床应用:方法:纳入在血栓切除术前接受脑 DECT 非对比扫描和脑 CT 灌注(CTP)的急性缺血性脑卒中患者,并通过术后病理分析血栓构成。DECT 数据用于重建多色图像和有效原子序数图像。测量并计算血栓的计算机断层扫描(CT)值、有效原子数和光谱曲线斜率。血栓的衰减增加可从 CTP 数据中获得。对以红细胞(RBC)为主的血栓和以纤维蛋白/血小板(F/P)为主的血栓进行了参数比较。分析了区分这些血栓的阈值、灵敏度、特异性和曲线下面积(AUC)。通过斯皮尔曼相关性分析了 DECT 参数与红细胞比例之间的关系:结果:对 42 例入选患者进行病理分析后发现,24 例血栓以 RBC为主,18 例血栓以F/P为主。与 F/P 型血栓组相比,RBC 型血栓组的有效原子数、光谱曲线斜率和多色图像 CT 值明显更高。虽然F/P为主血栓组的血栓平均衰减增加较多,但这一差异在统计学上并不显著。在 DECT 参数中,多色图像 CT 值的 AUC 最大,为 0.924(0.848-0.999),用于区分 RBC 主导血栓和 F/P 主导血栓,阈值为 59 HU,灵敏度为 79.2%,特异性为 94.4%。综合诊断 AUC 达到 0.938(0.863-1.012),灵敏度为 87.5%,特异度为 94.4%。DECT 多色图像 CT 值、有效原子数和光谱曲线斜率与红细胞比例显著相关(r = 0.673、0.574 和 0.571,均为 p 结论:DECT 多色图像 CT 值、有效原子数和光谱曲线斜率与红细胞比例显著相关(r = 0.673、0.574 和 0.571,均为 p):DECT 非对比扫描参数与血栓组成相关,可有效区分 RBC 主导型血栓和 F/P 主导型血栓。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
398
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: European Journal of Radiology is an international journal which aims to communicate to its readers, state-of-the-art information on imaging developments in the form of high quality original research articles and timely reviews on current developments in the field. Its audience includes clinicians at all levels of training including radiology trainees, newly qualified imaging specialists and the experienced radiologist. Its aim is to inform efficient, appropriate and evidence-based imaging practice to the benefit of patients worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Multilingual feasibility of GPT-4o for automated Voice-to-Text CT and MRI report transcription. Predicting functional outcome after open lumbar fusion surgery: A retrospective multicenter cohort study ECG, clinical and novel CT-imaging predictors of necessary pacemaker implantation after transfemoral aortic valve replacement In-vivo cerebral artery pulsation assessment with Dynamic computed tomography angiography Diagnostic performance of Photon-counting CT angiography in peripheral artery disease compared to DSA as gold standard
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1