Occupational epidemiological characteristics of noise-induced hearing loss and the impact of combined exposure to noise and dust on workers' hearing-a retrospective study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Frontiers in Public Health Pub Date : 2024-10-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1488065
Bin Zhou, Jiaxiang Zhang
{"title":"Occupational epidemiological characteristics of noise-induced hearing loss and the impact of combined exposure to noise and dust on workers' hearing-a retrospective study.","authors":"Bin Zhou, Jiaxiang Zhang","doi":"10.3389/fpubh.2024.1488065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of the study was to investigate the occupational epidemiological characteristics of hearing loss among noise-exposed workers through a cross-sectional study and to explore the impact of combined noise and dust exposure on workers' hearing loss through a longitudinal study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This cross-sectional study revealed that the risk of speech-frequency hearing loss increases with age (OR = 1.096, 95%CI = 1.081-1.111). Independent factors influencing high-frequency hearing loss include sex, age, hazardous factors, industry category, and enterprise size. Scientific research and technical services (OR = 1.607, 95%CI = 1.111-2.324), wholesale and retail (OR = 2.144, 95%CI = 1.479-3.107), manufacturing (OR = 1.907, 95%CI = 1.429-2.545), and other industries (OR = 1.583, 95%CI = 1.002-2.502) are risk factors for high-frequency hearing loss, whereas being female (OR = 0.297, 95%CI = 0.236-0.373) is a protective factor against high-frequency hearing loss. Independent factors influencing occupational noise-induced hearing loss include sex, working age, hazardous factors, industry category, smoking, and drinking, with the risk of occupational noise-induced hearing loss increasing with working age (OR = 1.045, 95%CI = 1.031-1.058). Noise and dust work (OR = 1.271, 95%CI = 1.011-1.597), other work (OR = 0.619, 95%CI = 0.479-0.800), manufacturing (OR = 2.085, 95%CI = 1.336-3.254), other industries (OR = 2.063, 95%CI = 1.060-4.012), occasional smokers (OR = 0.863, 95%CI = 0.652-1.142), regular smokers (OR = 1.216, 95% CI = 0.987-1.497), and excessive drinkers (OR = 2.171, 95%CI = 1.476-3.193) are risk factors for occupational noise-induced hearing loss, whereas being female (OR = 0.496, 95%CI = 0.347-0.709) is a protective factor against occupational noise-induced hearing loss. The longitudinal study revealed differences in pure-tone hearing threshold test results at 500 Hz, 1,000 Hz, 3,000 Hz, 4,000 Hz, and 6,000 Hz in both ears before and after enrollment among noise-exposed workers (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Combined noise and dust exposure (OR = 4.660, 95%CI = 1.584-13.711), 1st year (OR = 1.540, 95%CI = 1.128-2.103), 2nd year (OR = 1.994, 95%CI = 1.409-2.821), and 3rd year (OR = 1.628, 95%CI = 1.170-2.264) were risk factors for high-frequency hearing loss.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Combined noise and dust exposure is a risk factor for occupational noise-induced hearing loss. Additionally, occupational noise-induced hearing loss is influenced by gender, working age, enterprise industry category, smoking, and drinking. Employers should enhance occupational health management and improve workers' occupational health literacy, with a particular focus on older male workers of long working age, and those with unhealthy habits. Combined exposure to noise and dust may have a synergistic effect on causing high-frequency hearing loss, and comprehensive protective measures should be implemented for workers exposed to both.</p>","PeriodicalId":12548,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Public Health","volume":"12 ","pages":"1488065"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11557527/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1488065","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of the study was to investigate the occupational epidemiological characteristics of hearing loss among noise-exposed workers through a cross-sectional study and to explore the impact of combined noise and dust exposure on workers' hearing loss through a longitudinal study.

Results: This cross-sectional study revealed that the risk of speech-frequency hearing loss increases with age (OR = 1.096, 95%CI = 1.081-1.111). Independent factors influencing high-frequency hearing loss include sex, age, hazardous factors, industry category, and enterprise size. Scientific research and technical services (OR = 1.607, 95%CI = 1.111-2.324), wholesale and retail (OR = 2.144, 95%CI = 1.479-3.107), manufacturing (OR = 1.907, 95%CI = 1.429-2.545), and other industries (OR = 1.583, 95%CI = 1.002-2.502) are risk factors for high-frequency hearing loss, whereas being female (OR = 0.297, 95%CI = 0.236-0.373) is a protective factor against high-frequency hearing loss. Independent factors influencing occupational noise-induced hearing loss include sex, working age, hazardous factors, industry category, smoking, and drinking, with the risk of occupational noise-induced hearing loss increasing with working age (OR = 1.045, 95%CI = 1.031-1.058). Noise and dust work (OR = 1.271, 95%CI = 1.011-1.597), other work (OR = 0.619, 95%CI = 0.479-0.800), manufacturing (OR = 2.085, 95%CI = 1.336-3.254), other industries (OR = 2.063, 95%CI = 1.060-4.012), occasional smokers (OR = 0.863, 95%CI = 0.652-1.142), regular smokers (OR = 1.216, 95% CI = 0.987-1.497), and excessive drinkers (OR = 2.171, 95%CI = 1.476-3.193) are risk factors for occupational noise-induced hearing loss, whereas being female (OR = 0.496, 95%CI = 0.347-0.709) is a protective factor against occupational noise-induced hearing loss. The longitudinal study revealed differences in pure-tone hearing threshold test results at 500 Hz, 1,000 Hz, 3,000 Hz, 4,000 Hz, and 6,000 Hz in both ears before and after enrollment among noise-exposed workers (p < 0.05). Combined noise and dust exposure (OR = 4.660, 95%CI = 1.584-13.711), 1st year (OR = 1.540, 95%CI = 1.128-2.103), 2nd year (OR = 1.994, 95%CI = 1.409-2.821), and 3rd year (OR = 1.628, 95%CI = 1.170-2.264) were risk factors for high-frequency hearing loss.

Discussion: Combined noise and dust exposure is a risk factor for occupational noise-induced hearing loss. Additionally, occupational noise-induced hearing loss is influenced by gender, working age, enterprise industry category, smoking, and drinking. Employers should enhance occupational health management and improve workers' occupational health literacy, with a particular focus on older male workers of long working age, and those with unhealthy habits. Combined exposure to noise and dust may have a synergistic effect on causing high-frequency hearing loss, and comprehensive protective measures should be implemented for workers exposed to both.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
噪声诱发听力损失的职业流行病学特征以及噪声和粉尘联合暴露对工人听力的影响--一项回顾性研究。
研究简介本研究旨在通过横断面研究调查噪声暴露工人听力损失的职业流行病学特征,并通过纵向研究探讨噪声和粉尘联合暴露对工人听力损失的影响:这项横断面研究显示,言语频率听力损失的风险随着年龄的增长而增加(OR = 1.096,95%CI = 1.081-1.111)。影响高频听力损失的独立因素包括性别、年龄、危险因素、行业类别和企业规模。科学研究和技术服务业(OR = 1.607,95%CI = 1.111-2.324)、批发和零售业(OR = 2.144,95%CI = 1.479-3.107)、制造业(OR = 1.907,95%CI = 1.429-2.545)以及其他行业(OR = 1.583,95%CI = 1.002-2.502)是高频听力损失的危险因素,而女性(OR = 0.297,95%CI = 0.236-0.373)则是高频听力损失的保护因素。影响职业噪声性听力损失的独立因素包括性别、工作年龄、有害因素、行业类别、吸烟和饮酒,其中职业噪声性听力损失的风险随工作年龄的增长而增加(OR = 1.045,95%CI = 1.031-1.058)。噪声和粉尘工作(OR = 1.271,95%CI = 1.011-1.597)、其他工作(OR = 0.619,95%CI = 0.479-0.800)、制造业(OR = 2.085,95%CI = 1.336-3.254)、其他行业(OR = 2.063,95%CI = 1.060-4.012)、偶尔吸烟者(OR = 0.863,95%CI = 0.652-1.142)、经常吸烟者(OR = 1.216,95%CI = 0.987-1.497)和过度饮酒者(OR = 2.171,95%CI = 1.476-3.193)是职业噪声性听力损失的危险因素,而女性(OR = 0.496,95%CI = 0.347-0.709)则是职业噪声性听力损失的保护因素。纵向研究显示,接触噪声的工人在入学前后双耳在 500 赫兹、1,000 赫兹、3,000 赫兹、4,000 赫兹和 6,000 赫兹的纯音听阈测试结果存在差异(p 讨论):噪声和粉尘的综合接触是职业噪声性听力损失的一个风险因素。此外,职业噪声性听力损失还受性别、工作年龄、企业行业类别、吸烟和饮酒等因素的影响。用人单位应加强职业健康管理,提高劳动者的职业健康素养,尤其要关注工龄长、有不良嗜好的老年男性劳动者。同时接触噪声和粉尘可能会产生协同效应,导致高频听力损失,因此应为同时接触噪声和粉尘的劳动者提供全面的防护措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Public Health
Frontiers in Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
4469
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Public Health is a multidisciplinary open-access journal which publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research and is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians, policy makers and the public worldwide. The journal aims at overcoming current fragmentation in research and publication, promoting consistency in pursuing relevant scientific themes, and supporting finding dissemination and translation into practice. Frontiers in Public Health is organized into Specialty Sections that cover different areas of research in the field. Please refer to the author guidelines for details on article types and the submission process.
期刊最新文献
Acceptability of identification and management of perinatal anxiety: a qualitative interview study with postnatal women. Assessment of the relationship between living alone and suicidal behaviors based on prospective studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Impact of intergenerational support on older adults' care expectations in rural areas in China. Investigating a severe acute malnutrition outbreak in Dubti District, Awsiresu Zone, Afar Region, Northeast Ethiopia (2022). Socio-demographic determinants of dietary choices and their impact on health in Spanish adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1