Evaluation of Monotherapy Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate Versus Sodium Polystyrene Sulfonate for Acute Hyperkalemia: A Cohort Study.

IF 0.8 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Hospital Pharmacy Pub Date : 2024-10-11 DOI:10.1177/00185787241287676
Divine Grewal, Laurensia Urip, Lisa T Hong
{"title":"Evaluation of Monotherapy Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate Versus Sodium Polystyrene Sulfonate for Acute Hyperkalemia: A Cohort Study.","authors":"Divine Grewal, Laurensia Urip, Lisa T Hong","doi":"10.1177/00185787241287676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Comparison of monotherapy sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) versus sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS) is lacking. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of SZC versus SPS for acute potassium lowering. This retrospective cohort study included hospitalized adult patients with acute hyperkalemia treated with SZC or SPS monotherapy. The primary outcome was time to normalization of serum potassium. Secondary outcomes included necessity of additional treatment, achievement of normokalemia at 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours, and change in serum potassium from baseline to 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours. Fifty-one patients received SZC and 50 received SPS. Mean baseline potassium was 5.4 mmol/L for both groups. Median time to normokalemia was 14 (IQR 8-20) hours in the SZC group versus 17 (IQR 10-21) hours in the SPS group (<i>P</i> = .26). Normokalemia was achieved at 24 hours in 80% versus 77% in each group, respectively (<i>P</i> = .56). Six patients per group required additional treatment (<i>P</i> = .97). Mean serum potassium at all time points was numerically lower with SZC, but statistical significance was only observed at hour 8 (4.6 vs 5.0 mmol/L, <i>P</i> = .005), which was associated with a -0.77 versus -0.51 mmol/L decrease in serum potassium from baseline in each group, respectively (<i>P</i> = .026). SZC monotherapy is at least as effective as SPS in treating mild hyperkalemia and may reduce serum potassium more quickly and to a greater degree than SPS. Future research in more severe hyperkalemia and with monitoring of potassium at regular intervals is needed to better understand the role and potential advantages of SZC over SPS.</p>","PeriodicalId":13002,"journal":{"name":"Hospital Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":"00185787241287676"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559933/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00185787241287676","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Comparison of monotherapy sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) versus sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS) is lacking. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of SZC versus SPS for acute potassium lowering. This retrospective cohort study included hospitalized adult patients with acute hyperkalemia treated with SZC or SPS monotherapy. The primary outcome was time to normalization of serum potassium. Secondary outcomes included necessity of additional treatment, achievement of normokalemia at 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours, and change in serum potassium from baseline to 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours. Fifty-one patients received SZC and 50 received SPS. Mean baseline potassium was 5.4 mmol/L for both groups. Median time to normokalemia was 14 (IQR 8-20) hours in the SZC group versus 17 (IQR 10-21) hours in the SPS group (P = .26). Normokalemia was achieved at 24 hours in 80% versus 77% in each group, respectively (P = .56). Six patients per group required additional treatment (P = .97). Mean serum potassium at all time points was numerically lower with SZC, but statistical significance was only observed at hour 8 (4.6 vs 5.0 mmol/L, P = .005), which was associated with a -0.77 versus -0.51 mmol/L decrease in serum potassium from baseline in each group, respectively (P = .026). SZC monotherapy is at least as effective as SPS in treating mild hyperkalemia and may reduce serum potassium more quickly and to a greater degree than SPS. Future research in more severe hyperkalemia and with monitoring of potassium at regular intervals is needed to better understand the role and potential advantages of SZC over SPS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估单药治疗急性高钾血症的环硅酸锆钠与聚苯乙烯磺酸钠:队列研究。
目前还缺乏单一疗法环硅酸锆钠(SZC)与聚苯乙烯磺酸钠(SPS)的比较。我们旨在评估 SZC 与 SPS 对急性降钾的有效性。这项回顾性队列研究纳入了接受 SZC 或 SPS 单药治疗的急性高钾血症住院成年患者。主要结果是血清钾恢复正常的时间。次要结果包括是否需要额外治疗,1、2、4、8 和 24 小时内是否达到正常血钾,以及血清钾从基线到 1、2、4、8 和 24 小时的变化。51名患者接受了SZC治疗,50名患者接受了SPS治疗。两组患者的平均基线血钾均为 5.4 mmol/L。SZC 组达到正常血钾的中位时间为 14(IQR 8-20)小时,而 SPS 组为 17(IQR 10-21)小时(P = 0.26)。每组分别有 80% 和 77% 的患者在 24 小时内达到正常血钾(P = .56)。每组有 6 名患者需要额外治疗(P = .97)。SZC在所有时间点的平均血清钾在数值上都更低,但只有在第8小时才观察到统计学意义(4.6 vs 5.0 mmol/L,P = .005),这与各组血清钾从基线下降-0.77 vs -0.51 mmol/L有关(P = .026)。在治疗轻度高钾血症方面,SZC 单药治疗的效果至少与 SPS 相当,而且可能比 SPS 更快、更大程度地降低血清钾。未来需要对更严重的高钾血症进行研究,并定期监测血钾,以更好地了解 SZC 相对于 SPS 的作用和潜在优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hospital Pharmacy
Hospital Pharmacy PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Hospital Pharmacy is a monthly peer-reviewed journal that is read by pharmacists and other providers practicing in the inpatient and outpatient setting within hospitals, long-term care facilities, home care, and other health-system settings The Hospital Pharmacy Assistant Editor, Michael R. Cohen, RPh, MS, DSc, FASHP, is author of a Medication Error Report Analysis and founder of The Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP), a nonprofit organization that provides education about adverse drug events and their prevention.
期刊最新文献
Rhizobium radiobacter Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis - A Case Report and Literature Analysis. Enoxaparin Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Dosing in Critically Ill Underweight Patients. Axatilimab. A Cost Analysis of Opioid/Acetaminophen Therapy Versus a Multidrug, Opioid-Free Multimodal Postoperative Pain Control Regimen. Ensuring the Safety of Locally Sourced Alcohols for Hand Sanitizer Production During the SARS-CoV-2 Crisis: A Comprehensive Impurity Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1