Safety and efficacy of catheter-directed thrombectomy without thrombolysis in acute pulmonary embolism: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Background

This meta-analysis aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of catheter-directed thrombectomy (CDT) without using adjunct thrombolysis as reperfusion therapy to manage intermediate and high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE).

Methods

A literature search of Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CiNAHL, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted from inception to January 2024. Eligible studies reported more than 10 patients treated for acute PE with catheter-directed thrombectomy only, who were over 18 years of age. Primary endpoints were major bleeding, in-hospital mortality, and hemodynamic changes.

Results

Eighteen studies (n = 803) were included for quantitative analysis. The pooled estimate of incidences of in-hospital mortality and major bleeding was 1.8 % (95 % CI 0.009, 0.027) and 2.1 % (95 % CI 0.011, 0.031) respectively. A pooled estimate reported a post-procedural increase in oxygen saturation and systolic blood pressure by 8.96 % (95 % CI: 3.54, 14.38) and 15.02 mmHg (95 % CI 6.35, 23.69) respectively. Post-procedural mean pulmonary artery pressure, right ventricle/left ventricle (RV/LV) ratio, and Miller score were reduced by 10.30 mmHg (95 % CI -14.94, −5.66), 0.29 (95 % CI -0.50, −0.08) and 8.09 (95 % CI -10.70, −5.47) respectively.

Conclusion

CDT without adjunctive thrombolysis may lead to improvements in hemodynamic outcomes and exhibits favorable safety profiles. This meta-analysis provides a rationale for lowering the threshold for considering this technique, and ongoing randomized trials will further advance the field to determine optimal managment strategies for intermediate and high-risk acute PE.