Telehealth Brief Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Suicide Prevention: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL JAMA Network Open Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.45913
Justin C Baker, Austin Starkey, Ennio Ammendola, Christina Rose Bauder, Samantha E Daruwala, Jaryd Hiser, Lauren R Khazem, Keelin Rademacher, Jarrod Hay, AnnaBelle O Bryan, Craig J Bryan
{"title":"Telehealth Brief Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Suicide Prevention: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Justin C Baker, Austin Starkey, Ennio Ammendola, Christina Rose Bauder, Samantha E Daruwala, Jaryd Hiser, Lauren R Khazem, Keelin Rademacher, Jarrod Hay, AnnaBelle O Bryan, Craig J Bryan","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.45913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Suicide rates continue to increase in the US. Evidence-based treatments for suicide risk exist, but their effectiveness when delivered via telehealth remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To test the efficacy of brief cognitive behavioral therapy (BCBT) for reducing suicide attempts and suicidal ideation among high-risk adults when delivered via telehealth.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This 2-group parallel randomized clinical trial comparing BCBT with present-centered therapy (PCT) was conducted from April 2021 to September 2023 with 1-year follow-up at an outpatient psychiatry and behavioral health clinic located in the midwestern US. Participants reporting suicidal ideation during the past week and/or suicidal behavior during the past month were recruited from clinic waiting lists, inpatient service, intermediate care, research match, and direct referrals from clinicians. A total of 768 participants were invited to participate, 112 were assessed for eligibility, and 98 were eligible and randomly assigned to a treatment condition. Data analysis was from April to September 2024.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Participants received either BCBT, an evidence-based suicide-focused treatment that teaches emotion regulation and reappraisal skills, or PCT, a goal-oriented treatment that helps participants identify adaptive responses to stressors. Participants were randomized using a computerized stratified randomization algorithm with 2 strata (sex and history of suicide attempts).</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was suicide attempts as measured by the Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview-Revised. The secondary outcome was severity of suicidal ideation as measured by the Scale for Suicide Ideation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants included 96 adults (mean [SD] age, 31.8 [12.6] years; 64 female [66.7%] and 32 male [33.3%]), with 51 receiving BCBT and 45 receiving PCT. Of all participants, 85 (88.5%) completed at least 1 session. From baseline to 12 months, 12 participants receiving PCT (estimated percentage, 35.6%) made 56 suicide attempts and 11 participants receiving BCBT (estimated percentage, 30.0%) made 36 suicide attempts. Participants randomized to BCBT made significantly fewer suicide attempts than participants randomized to PCT (mean [range], 0.70 [0.00-8.00] attempts per participant vs 1.40 [0.00-10.00] per participant) and had a 41% reduced risk for suicide attempts (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.36-0.96; P = .03). Severity of suicidal ideation significantly decreased in both treatments (F4,330 = 50.1; P < .001) but did not differ between groups (F4,330  = 0.2; P = .91).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The findings of this randomized clinical trial suggest that BCBT delivered via video telehealth is effective for reducing suicide attempts among adults with recent suicidal thoughts and/or behaviors.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04844294.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"7 11","pages":"e2445913"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11558477/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.45913","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Suicide rates continue to increase in the US. Evidence-based treatments for suicide risk exist, but their effectiveness when delivered via telehealth remains unknown.

Objective: To test the efficacy of brief cognitive behavioral therapy (BCBT) for reducing suicide attempts and suicidal ideation among high-risk adults when delivered via telehealth.

Design, setting, and participants: This 2-group parallel randomized clinical trial comparing BCBT with present-centered therapy (PCT) was conducted from April 2021 to September 2023 with 1-year follow-up at an outpatient psychiatry and behavioral health clinic located in the midwestern US. Participants reporting suicidal ideation during the past week and/or suicidal behavior during the past month were recruited from clinic waiting lists, inpatient service, intermediate care, research match, and direct referrals from clinicians. A total of 768 participants were invited to participate, 112 were assessed for eligibility, and 98 were eligible and randomly assigned to a treatment condition. Data analysis was from April to September 2024.

Interventions: Participants received either BCBT, an evidence-based suicide-focused treatment that teaches emotion regulation and reappraisal skills, or PCT, a goal-oriented treatment that helps participants identify adaptive responses to stressors. Participants were randomized using a computerized stratified randomization algorithm with 2 strata (sex and history of suicide attempts).

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was suicide attempts as measured by the Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview-Revised. The secondary outcome was severity of suicidal ideation as measured by the Scale for Suicide Ideation.

Results: Participants included 96 adults (mean [SD] age, 31.8 [12.6] years; 64 female [66.7%] and 32 male [33.3%]), with 51 receiving BCBT and 45 receiving PCT. Of all participants, 85 (88.5%) completed at least 1 session. From baseline to 12 months, 12 participants receiving PCT (estimated percentage, 35.6%) made 56 suicide attempts and 11 participants receiving BCBT (estimated percentage, 30.0%) made 36 suicide attempts. Participants randomized to BCBT made significantly fewer suicide attempts than participants randomized to PCT (mean [range], 0.70 [0.00-8.00] attempts per participant vs 1.40 [0.00-10.00] per participant) and had a 41% reduced risk for suicide attempts (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.36-0.96; P = .03). Severity of suicidal ideation significantly decreased in both treatments (F4,330 = 50.1; P < .001) but did not differ between groups (F4,330  = 0.2; P = .91).

Conclusions and relevance: The findings of this randomized clinical trial suggest that BCBT delivered via video telehealth is effective for reducing suicide attempts among adults with recent suicidal thoughts and/or behaviors.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04844294.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预防自杀的远程健康简短认知行为疗法:随机临床试验
重要性:美国的自杀率持续上升。目前已有针对自杀风险的循证疗法,但通过远程医疗提供这些疗法的效果仍不清楚:目的:测试简短认知行为疗法(BCBT)通过远程医疗方式减少高危成人自杀企图和自杀意念的疗效:这项两组平行随机临床试验比较了简短认知行为疗法(BCBT)和以现在为中心的疗法(PCT),试验于 2021 年 4 月至 2023 年 9 月在美国中西部的一家精神病学和行为健康门诊进行,随访 1 年。报告在过去一周内有自杀意念和/或在过去一个月内有自杀行为的参与者是从诊所候诊名单、住院服务、中间护理、研究匹配和临床医生直接转介中招募的。共有 768 人受邀参加,112 人通过资格评估,98 人符合条件并被随机分配到治疗条件中。数据分析时间为 2024 年 4 月至 9 月:干预措施:参与者接受BCBT或PCT治疗,前者是一种以自杀为重点的循证治疗,教授情绪调节和重新评估技能;后者是一种目标导向型治疗,帮助参与者识别对压力的适应性反应。采用计算机分层随机化算法对参与者进行随机化,其中包括两个分层(性别和自杀未遂史):主要结果和测量方法:主要结果是自杀未遂,通过自伤想法和行为访谈-修订版进行测量。次要结果是自杀意念的严重程度,采用自杀意念量表进行测量:参与者包括 96 名成年人(平均 [SD] 年龄为 31.8 [12.6] 岁;64 名女性 [66.7%] 和 32 名男性 [33.3%]),其中 51 人接受了 BCBT 治疗,45 人接受了 PCT 治疗。在所有参与者中,85 人(88.5%)至少完成了一次治疗。从基线到 12 个月期间,12 名接受 PCT 的参与者(估计比例为 35.6%)有 56 次自杀企图,11 名接受 BCBT 的参与者(估计比例为 30.0%)有 36 次自杀企图。随机接受 BCBT 的参与者自杀未遂的次数明显少于随机接受 PCT 的参与者(平均 [范围],0.70 [0.00-8.00] 次/人 vs 1.40 [0.00-10.00] 次/人),自杀未遂的风险降低了 41%(危险比,0.59;95% CI,0.36-0.96;P = .03)。两种治疗方法的自杀意念严重程度均显著降低(F4,330 = 50.1;P 结论及意义:这项随机临床试验的结果表明,通过视频远程保健提供的 BCBT 能够有效减少近期有自杀想法和/或行为的成年人的自杀企图:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT04844294。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
期刊最新文献
JAMA Network Open. Meal Timing Interventions for Weight Loss and Metabolic Health-What Does the Evidence Tell Us So Far? Saving Children's Lives Through Universal Pediatric Readiness Is a Wise Investment. Anemia Acuity Effect on Transfusion Strategies in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Secondary Analysis of the MINT Trial. Effectiveness of Virtual Yoga for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1