Intersection of Race and Rurality With Health Care-Associated Infections and Subsequent Outcomes.

IF 9.7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL JAMA Network Open Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.53993
Katelin B Nickel, Hannah Kinzer, Anne M Butler, Karen E Joynt Maddox, Victoria J Fraser, Jason P Burnham, Jennie H Kwon
{"title":"Intersection of Race and Rurality With Health Care-Associated Infections and Subsequent Outcomes.","authors":"Katelin B Nickel, Hannah Kinzer, Anne M Butler, Karen E Joynt Maddox, Victoria J Fraser, Jason P Burnham, Jennie H Kwon","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.53993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Health care-associated infections (HAIs) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality, but little is known about whether structural factors impacting race and rurality are associated with HAI and subsequent outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the association of race and rurality, which are proxies for structural disadvantage, with HAI and subsequent outcomes.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cohort study was conducted at 3 US urban and suburban hospitals. Participants were adults aged 18 years or older admitted for 48 hours or longer from January 1, 2017, to August 31, 2020. Statistical analysis was performed from November 2022 to April 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Patient race and rurality status were defined as the combination of race (Black or White) and residence (urban or rural per patient zip code).</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>HAI was defined as a positive culture from a urine, blood, or respiratory specimen obtained 48 hours or longer after admission. To determine the association of race and rurality with HAIs, multivariable generalized estimating equations models were used to account for clustering of admissions by patient. Among patients with HAI admissions, similar models examined post-HAI intensive care unit admission and in-hospital death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 214 955 patients admitted to the hospital (median [IQR] age, 63 [51-73] years; 108 679 female patients [50.6%]; 72 490 Black patients [33.7%]; 142 465 White patients [66.3%]), recognized HAIs occurred during 6699 (3.1%). Compared with White urban patients, Black urban patients had a decreased risk of HAI (adjusted relative risk [aRR], 0.81; 95% CI, 0.75-0.87), White rural patients had an increased risk of HAI (aRR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.05-1.20), and Black rural patients (aRR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.81-1.44) had a similar risk of HAI. Among patients with HAI admissions, Black rural patients had an increased risk of intensive care unit admission (aRR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.16-3.17) and in-hospital death (aRR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.26-2.50). White rural and Black urban patients had outcomes similar to those of White urban patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This cohort study of hospitalized adults identified inequities related to race and rurality in HAIs and adverse outcomes from HAIs. These findings suggest that factors such as structural racism and disinvestment in rural communities may be associated with individual HAI risk and post-HAI outcomes. Future work to further understand the reasons underpinning these disparities and methods to address structural factors through policy and process changes are critical to eliminate health inequities.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 2","pages":"e2453993"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11791699/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.53993","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Health care-associated infections (HAIs) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality, but little is known about whether structural factors impacting race and rurality are associated with HAI and subsequent outcomes.

Objective: To evaluate the association of race and rurality, which are proxies for structural disadvantage, with HAI and subsequent outcomes.

Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study was conducted at 3 US urban and suburban hospitals. Participants were adults aged 18 years or older admitted for 48 hours or longer from January 1, 2017, to August 31, 2020. Statistical analysis was performed from November 2022 to April 2024.

Exposure: Patient race and rurality status were defined as the combination of race (Black or White) and residence (urban or rural per patient zip code).

Main outcomes and measures: HAI was defined as a positive culture from a urine, blood, or respiratory specimen obtained 48 hours or longer after admission. To determine the association of race and rurality with HAIs, multivariable generalized estimating equations models were used to account for clustering of admissions by patient. Among patients with HAI admissions, similar models examined post-HAI intensive care unit admission and in-hospital death.

Results: Among 214 955 patients admitted to the hospital (median [IQR] age, 63 [51-73] years; 108 679 female patients [50.6%]; 72 490 Black patients [33.7%]; 142 465 White patients [66.3%]), recognized HAIs occurred during 6699 (3.1%). Compared with White urban patients, Black urban patients had a decreased risk of HAI (adjusted relative risk [aRR], 0.81; 95% CI, 0.75-0.87), White rural patients had an increased risk of HAI (aRR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.05-1.20), and Black rural patients (aRR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.81-1.44) had a similar risk of HAI. Among patients with HAI admissions, Black rural patients had an increased risk of intensive care unit admission (aRR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.16-3.17) and in-hospital death (aRR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.26-2.50). White rural and Black urban patients had outcomes similar to those of White urban patients.

Conclusions and relevance: This cohort study of hospitalized adults identified inequities related to race and rurality in HAIs and adverse outcomes from HAIs. These findings suggest that factors such as structural racism and disinvestment in rural communities may be associated with individual HAI risk and post-HAI outcomes. Future work to further understand the reasons underpinning these disparities and methods to address structural factors through policy and process changes are critical to eliminate health inequities.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
种族和农村与卫生保健相关感染和后续结果的交叉
重要性:卫生保健相关感染(HAIs)是发病率和死亡率的主要原因,但影响种族和农村性的结构性因素是否与HAI和随后的结果相关尚不清楚。目的:评估种族和乡村性与HAI和后续结果的关系,这是结构性劣势的代表。设计、环境和参与者:本队列研究在3家美国城市和郊区医院进行。参与者是2017年1月1日至2020年8月31日期间入住48小时或更长时间的18岁或以上的成年人。统计分析时间为2022年11月至2024年4月。暴露:患者种族和农村状况定义为种族(黑人或白人)和居住地(每个患者邮政编码的城市或农村)的组合。主要结局和措施:HAI定义为入院后48小时或更长时间尿液、血液或呼吸标本培养阳性。为了确定种族和农村与HAIs的关系,使用多变量广义估计方程模型来解释患者入院的聚类。在HAI入院的患者中,类似的模型检查了HAI后重症监护病房入院和院内死亡。结果:214例 住院患者955例(中位[IQR]年龄63[51-73]岁;108例 女性679例[50.6%];72例 490例黑人患者[33.7%];142例 465例白人患者[66.3%]),6699例(3.1%)发生HAIs。与城市白人患者相比,城市黑人患者发生HAI的风险较低(校正相对风险[aRR], 0.81;95% CI, 0.75-0.87),白人农村患者患HAI的风险增加(aRR, 1.12;95% CI, 1.05-1.20),黑人农村患者(aRR, 1.08;95% CI, 0.81-1.44)患HAI的风险相似。在住院的HAI患者中,农村黑人患者进入重症监护病房的风险增加(aRR, 1.92;95% CI, 1.16-3.17)和院内死亡(aRR, 1.78;95% ci, 1.26-2.50)。农村白人和城市黑人患者的结果与城市白人患者相似。结论和相关性:这项对住院成人的队列研究发现了与种族和农村性有关的不平等,以及与HAIs相关的不良后果。这些发现表明,结构性种族主义和农村社区的撤资等因素可能与个人HAI风险和HAI后结果有关。未来进一步了解这些差异背后的原因以及通过政策和流程变革解决结构性因素的方法的工作对于消除卫生不平等至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
期刊最新文献
Generative Artificial Intelligence Applications Use Among US Youth. Extraintestinal Invasive Escherichia coli Infections in the US. Costs of Single Maintenance and Reliever Therapy vs Traditional Therapy for Asthma. Maternal Health Workforce Expansion and Local Childbirths. Serous Ovarian Cancer Following Opportunistic Bilateral Salpingectomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1