Efficacy and safety of multi-day antiemetic treatment for patients undergoing multi-day chemotherapy: a systematic review of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Antiemesis 2023 from Japan Society of Clinical Oncology.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY International Journal of Clinical Oncology Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1007/s10147-024-02652-7
Kazuhisa Nakashima, Saki Harashima, Rena Kaneko, Ryuhei Tanaka, Masakazu Abe, Makoto Wada, Keiko Iino, Tatsuo Akechi, Hirotoshi Iihara, Chiyo K Imamura, Ayako Okuyama, Keiko Ozawa, Yong-Il Kim, Eriko Satomi, Masayuki Takeda, Takako Eguchi Nakajima, Naoki Nakamura, Junichi Nishimura, Mayumi Noda, Kazumi Hayashi, Takahiro Higashi, Narikazu Boku, Koji Matsumoto, Yoko Matsumoto, Kenji Okita, Nobuyuki Yamamoto, Kenjiro Aogi, Hidenori Sasaki
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of multi-day antiemetic treatment for patients undergoing multi-day chemotherapy: a systematic review of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Antiemesis 2023 from Japan Society of Clinical Oncology.","authors":"Kazuhisa Nakashima, Saki Harashima, Rena Kaneko, Ryuhei Tanaka, Masakazu Abe, Makoto Wada, Keiko Iino, Tatsuo Akechi, Hirotoshi Iihara, Chiyo K Imamura, Ayako Okuyama, Keiko Ozawa, Yong-Il Kim, Eriko Satomi, Masayuki Takeda, Takako Eguchi Nakajima, Naoki Nakamura, Junichi Nishimura, Mayumi Noda, Kazumi Hayashi, Takahiro Higashi, Narikazu Boku, Koji Matsumoto, Yoko Matsumoto, Kenji Okita, Nobuyuki Yamamoto, Kenjiro Aogi, Hidenori Sasaki","doi":"10.1007/s10147-024-02652-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A standardized multi-day antiemetic regimen for multi-day chemotherapy remains elusive. This systematic review evaluated the efficacy and safety of multi-day antiemetic regimens in patients undergoing multi-day intravenous chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Ichushi-Web databases for relevant studies published from January 1990 to December 2020. We included studies comparing multi-day and single-day antiemetic regimens for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No studies directly comparing multi-day versus single-day antiemetic regimens were found. Despite expanding control group criteria beyond \"single-day antiemetic therapy\" limited high-quality studies and variations in cancer types, chemotherapy regimens, and antiemetic treatments precluded meta-analysis. Among the included studies, some randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focused on complete response and vomiting rates. Two studies comparing two- and three-drug combinations reported higher complete response and no-vomiting rates with the three-drug regimen. Limited RCTs explored \"nausea control\" and \"cost,\" and assessing \"adverse events\" proved challenging due to inconsistent reporting.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The research on multi-day antiemetic therapy is limited, necessitating further investigation. Nonetheless, our findings suggest that three-drug combination therapy, including aprepitant, may offer superior antiemetic efficacy compared to two-drug regimens. Multi-day antiemetic therapy is strongly recommended during multi-day intravenous administration of cytotoxic anticancer drugs.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-024-02652-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A standardized multi-day antiemetic regimen for multi-day chemotherapy remains elusive. This systematic review evaluated the efficacy and safety of multi-day antiemetic regimens in patients undergoing multi-day intravenous chemotherapy.

Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Ichushi-Web databases for relevant studies published from January 1990 to December 2020. We included studies comparing multi-day and single-day antiemetic regimens for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.

Results: No studies directly comparing multi-day versus single-day antiemetic regimens were found. Despite expanding control group criteria beyond "single-day antiemetic therapy" limited high-quality studies and variations in cancer types, chemotherapy regimens, and antiemetic treatments precluded meta-analysis. Among the included studies, some randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focused on complete response and vomiting rates. Two studies comparing two- and three-drug combinations reported higher complete response and no-vomiting rates with the three-drug regimen. Limited RCTs explored "nausea control" and "cost," and assessing "adverse events" proved challenging due to inconsistent reporting.

Conclusion: The research on multi-day antiemetic therapy is limited, necessitating further investigation. Nonetheless, our findings suggest that three-drug combination therapy, including aprepitant, may offer superior antiemetic efficacy compared to two-drug regimens. Multi-day antiemetic therapy is strongly recommended during multi-day intravenous administration of cytotoxic anticancer drugs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对接受多日化疗患者进行多日止吐治疗的有效性和安全性:日本临床肿瘤学会《止吐临床实践指南2023》的系统回顾。
背景:针对多日化疗的标准化多日止吐方案仍未确定。本系统综述评估了多日静脉化疗患者多日止吐方案的有效性和安全性:我们在 PubMed、Cochrane Library 和 Ichushi-Web 数据库中全面检索了 1990 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间发表的相关研究。我们纳入了比较多日和单日止吐方案以预防化疗引起的恶心和呕吐的研究:结果:没有发现直接比较多日与单日止吐方案的研究。尽管将对照组标准扩大到 "单日止吐疗法 "之外,但由于高质量研究有限,且癌症类型、化疗方案和止吐疗法各不相同,因此无法进行荟萃分析。在纳入的研究中,一些随机对照试验(RCT)侧重于完全反应率和呕吐率。两项比较两药和三药联合疗法的研究报告称,三药联合疗法的完全缓解率和无呕吐率更高。有限的研究对 "恶心控制 "和 "成本 "进行了探讨,由于报告不一致,评估 "不良事件 "具有挑战性:结论:关于多日止吐疗法的研究十分有限,有必要进行进一步调查。尽管如此,我们的研究结果表明,包括阿瑞匹坦在内的三药联合疗法的止吐效果可能优于两药疗法。在多日静脉注射细胞毒性抗癌药物期间,强烈建议采用多日止吐疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
175
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Oncology (IJCO) welcomes original research papers on all aspects of clinical oncology that report the results of novel and timely investigations. Reports on clinical trials are encouraged. Experimental studies will also be accepted if they have obvious relevance to clinical oncology. Membership in the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology is not a prerequisite for submission to the journal. Papers are received on the understanding that: their contents have not been published in whole or in part elsewhere; that they are subject to peer review by at least two referees and the Editors, and to editorial revision of the language and contents; and that the Editors are responsible for their acceptance, rejection, and order of publication.
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Effect of extending the period from oral administration of 5-aminolevulinic acid hydrochloride to photodynamic diagnosis during transurethral resection for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer on diagnostic accuracy and safety: a single-arm multicenter phase III trial. Electronic patient-reported outcomes as digital therapeutics for patients with cancer: a narrative review of current practices and future directions. Real-world outcomes of avelumab plus axitinib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma in Japan: long-term follow-up from the J-DART2 retrospective study. Phase Ib study of the oral PI3Kδ inhibitor linperlisib in patients with advanced solid tumors. Efficacy and safety of multi-day antiemetic treatment for patients undergoing multi-day chemotherapy: a systematic review of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Antiemesis 2023 from Japan Society of Clinical Oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1