Is retinal vein occlusion highly associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kai-Yang Chen, Hoi-Chun Chan, Chi-Ming Chan
{"title":"Is retinal vein occlusion highly associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction? A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Kai-Yang Chen, Hoi-Chun Chan, Chi-Ming Chan","doi":"10.1186/s40942-024-00606-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) and acute myocardial infarction (MI) are significant vascular events that impact patient health and mortality. Both conditions share common risk factors, such as hypertension, diabetes, and atherosclerosis. This study investigated the potential connection between RVO and MI, particularly among younger individuals, to improve preventive measures and management protocols.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted, adhering to the PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. Multiple databases, including PubMed, Scopus, MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, and ClinicalTrials.gov, were exhaustively searched until August 24, 2024. Studies were selected based on their reports of the association between RVO and MI risk. Quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale, and data were pooled using a random-effects model with hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Twelve studies comprising 371,817 participants were included. Meta-analysis revealed a pooled hazard ratio of 1.324 (95% CI, 1.238-1.415), indicating a significant association between RVO and increased MI risk (p = 0.0001). Subgroup analysis for central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) showed a hazard ratio of 1.691 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.142, 2.502, p = 0.009) with moderate heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 36%), whereas branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) yielded a non-significant hazard ratio of 1.167 (95% CI 0.843, 2.106, p = 0.444; I<sup>2</sup> = 33%). Publication bias was identified (Egger's test, p = 0.036) and addressed through trim-and-fill adjustment, maintaining statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our meta-analysis shows a strong association between CRVO and a 69.1% increased risk of MI, while BRVO shows no significant correlation. Overall, RVO is linked to a 32.4% elevated risk of MI. Despite slight publication bias, adjusted analyses confirm reliability, indicating that improved cardiovascular monitoring for RVO patients, especially those with CRVO, is essential to mitigate MI risk.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":14289,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Retina and Vitreous","volume":"10 1","pages":"86"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11556175/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Retina and Vitreous","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40942-024-00606-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) and acute myocardial infarction (MI) are significant vascular events that impact patient health and mortality. Both conditions share common risk factors, such as hypertension, diabetes, and atherosclerosis. This study investigated the potential connection between RVO and MI, particularly among younger individuals, to improve preventive measures and management protocols.

Method: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted, adhering to the PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. Multiple databases, including PubMed, Scopus, MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, and ClinicalTrials.gov, were exhaustively searched until August 24, 2024. Studies were selected based on their reports of the association between RVO and MI risk. Quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale, and data were pooled using a random-effects model with hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals.

Result: Twelve studies comprising 371,817 participants were included. Meta-analysis revealed a pooled hazard ratio of 1.324 (95% CI, 1.238-1.415), indicating a significant association between RVO and increased MI risk (p = 0.0001). Subgroup analysis for central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) showed a hazard ratio of 1.691 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.142, 2.502, p = 0.009) with moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 36%), whereas branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) yielded a non-significant hazard ratio of 1.167 (95% CI 0.843, 2.106, p = 0.444; I2 = 33%). Publication bias was identified (Egger's test, p = 0.036) and addressed through trim-and-fill adjustment, maintaining statistical significance.

Conclusion: Our meta-analysis shows a strong association between CRVO and a 69.1% increased risk of MI, while BRVO shows no significant correlation. Overall, RVO is linked to a 32.4% elevated risk of MI. Despite slight publication bias, adjusted analyses confirm reliability, indicating that improved cardiovascular monitoring for RVO patients, especially those with CRVO, is essential to mitigate MI risk.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
视网膜静脉闭塞与心肌梗死风险增加高度相关吗?系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景和目的:视网膜静脉闭塞(RVO)和急性心肌梗死(MI)是影响患者健康和死亡率的重大血管事件。这两种疾病都有共同的风险因素,如高血压、糖尿病和动脉粥样硬化。本研究调查了 RVO 和心肌梗死之间的潜在联系,尤其是在年轻人中,以改进预防措施和管理方案:方法:按照 PRISMA 和 MOOSE 指南进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。截至 2024 年 8 月 24 日,对多个数据库(包括 PubMed、Scopus、MEDLINE、ScienceDirect 和 ClinicalTrials.gov)进行了详尽检索。选择研究的依据是其关于 RVO 与心肌梗死风险之间关系的报告。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华质量评估量表进行质量评估,并使用随机效应模型和危险比及95%置信区间对数据进行汇总:结果:共纳入12项研究,371 817名参与者。元分析显示,汇总的危险比为1.324(95% CI,1.238-1.415),表明RVO与心肌梗死风险增加之间存在显著关联(p = 0.0001)。视网膜中央静脉闭塞(CRVO)的亚组分析显示,其危险比为 1.691(95% 置信区间 [CI] 1.142,2.502,p = 0.009),具有中度异质性(I2 = 36%),而视网膜分支静脉闭塞(BRVO)的危险比为 1.167(95% CI 0.843,2.106,p = 0.444;I2 = 33%),不显著。发现了发表偏倚(Egger 检验,p = 0.036),并通过修剪和填充调整解决了这一问题,保持了统计学意义:我们的荟萃分析表明,CRVO 与心肌梗死风险增加 69.1%密切相关,而 BRVO 则无明显相关性。总体而言,RVO 与心肌梗死风险增加 32.4% 有关。尽管存在轻微的发表偏差,但调整后的分析证实了可靠性,表明改善对RVO患者,尤其是CRVO患者的心血管监测对降低心肌梗死风险至关重要:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
81
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Retina and Vitreous focuses on the ophthalmic subspecialty of vitreoretinal disorders. The journal presents original articles on new approaches to diagnosis, outcomes of clinical trials, innovations in pharmacological therapy and surgical techniques, as well as basic science advances that impact clinical practice. Topical areas include, but are not limited to: -Imaging of the retina, choroid and vitreous -Innovations in optical coherence tomography (OCT) -Small-gauge vitrectomy, retinal detachment, chromovitrectomy -Electroretinography (ERG), microperimetry, other functional tests -Intraocular tumors -Retinal pharmacotherapy & drug delivery -Diabetic retinopathy & other vascular diseases -Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) & other macular entities
期刊最新文献
Choroidal vascularity index in health and systemic diseases: a systematic review. Is retinal vein occlusion highly associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Structural effects of intraretinal cysts on outer retinal layers in eyes with diabetic macular edema. Blue light reflectance imaging in non-perfusion areas detection: insights from multimodal analysis. Diabetic macular edema (DME): dissecting pathogenesis, prognostication, diagnostic modalities along with current and futuristic therapeutic insights.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1