Margin of safety for needle puncture of a radial artery in children: Recommendation for ultrasound-guided cannulation.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Journal of Anesthesia Pub Date : 2024-11-10 DOI:10.1007/s00540-024-03419-0
Kazuyoshi Furuta, Takashi Asai, Hiroaki Suzuki, Shunsuke Saima, Yasuhisa Okuda
{"title":"Margin of safety for needle puncture of a radial artery in children: Recommendation for ultrasound-guided cannulation.","authors":"Kazuyoshi Furuta, Takashi Asai, Hiroaki Suzuki, Shunsuke Saima, Yasuhisa Okuda","doi":"10.1007/s00540-024-03419-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The radial artery is commonly selected for arterial puncture and cannulation, but radial nerve palsy may occur. To minimize possible damage to the nerve, needle puncture should be made within the margin of safety (between the wrist to the distal end of the radial artery and the radial nerve running in parallel). In adults, the margin of safety for radial artery puncture is approximately 6.8 cm from the wrist in men and approximately 5.4 cm in women, but the margin of safety is not known in children of different age groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using an ultrasound device, we measured the margin of safety in 100 anesthetized patients aged 0 months to 15 yr. Polynomial quadratic regression models were made, and the lower limit of the prediction interval was regarded as the margin of safety. These results were then compared with the results obtained in adults.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The margin of safety became wider as a child grows older, and the height, weight, and age were all suitable explanatory variables to predict the margin of safety, providing fairly a constant predicted margin of safety from a few millimeters in neonates to approximately 4 cm in adolescents (much narrower than in adults).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In children and adolescents, the margin of safety for radial artery puncture is much narrower than in adults, and these findings support the recommendation to use ultrasound guidance during radial artery puncture in children and adolescents, to minimize the risk of associated complications.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>jRCT1032230243.</p>","PeriodicalId":14997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-024-03419-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The radial artery is commonly selected for arterial puncture and cannulation, but radial nerve palsy may occur. To minimize possible damage to the nerve, needle puncture should be made within the margin of safety (between the wrist to the distal end of the radial artery and the radial nerve running in parallel). In adults, the margin of safety for radial artery puncture is approximately 6.8 cm from the wrist in men and approximately 5.4 cm in women, but the margin of safety is not known in children of different age groups.

Methods: Using an ultrasound device, we measured the margin of safety in 100 anesthetized patients aged 0 months to 15 yr. Polynomial quadratic regression models were made, and the lower limit of the prediction interval was regarded as the margin of safety. These results were then compared with the results obtained in adults.

Results: The margin of safety became wider as a child grows older, and the height, weight, and age were all suitable explanatory variables to predict the margin of safety, providing fairly a constant predicted margin of safety from a few millimeters in neonates to approximately 4 cm in adolescents (much narrower than in adults).

Conclusions: In children and adolescents, the margin of safety for radial artery puncture is much narrower than in adults, and these findings support the recommendation to use ultrasound guidance during radial artery puncture in children and adolescents, to minimize the risk of associated complications.

Clinical trial registration: jRCT1032230243.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童桡动脉针刺的安全系数:关于超声引导下插管的建议。
背景:动脉穿刺和插管通常选择桡动脉,但可能会发生桡神经麻痹。为尽量减少可能对神经造成的损伤,穿刺针应在安全范围内(手腕至桡动脉远端与桡神经平行之间)进行。在成人中,男性桡动脉穿刺的安全范围约为距手腕 6.8 厘米,女性约为 5.4 厘米,但不同年龄段儿童的安全范围尚不清楚:我们使用超声设备测量了 100 名 0 个月至 15 岁麻醉患者的安全系数。然后将这些结果与在成人身上获得的结果进行比较:身高、体重和年龄都是预测安全系数的合适解释变量,从新生儿的几毫米到青少年的约 4 厘米(比成人窄得多),预测的安全系数相当稳定:在儿童和青少年中,桡动脉穿刺的安全范围比成人窄得多,这些发现支持在儿童和青少年中进行桡动脉穿刺时使用超声引导的建议,以最大限度地降低相关并发症的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Anesthesia
Journal of Anesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
112
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Anesthesia is the official journal of the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists. This journal publishes original articles, review articles, special articles, clinical reports, short communications, letters to the editor, and book and multimedia reviews. The editors welcome the submission of manuscripts devoted to anesthesia and related topics from any country of the world. Membership in the Society is not a prerequisite. The Journal of Anesthesia (JA) welcomes case reports that show unique cases in perioperative medicine, intensive care, emergency medicine, and pain management.
期刊最新文献
Acknowledgment to reviewers. Rhomboid intercostal and PECS blocks for breast surgery. Airway management in pediatrics: improving safety. Post-esophagectomy patients presenting for general anesthesia induction: a survey of practice among US anesthesiologists (PESO-GAIN-S). The effect of intravenous lidocaine infusion on subarachnoid anesthesia in patients undergoing total knee replacement: a randomised controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1