Journal of Anesthesia最新文献

Purpose: Remimazolam is often used for perioperative sedation due to its rapid onset and offset. However, the possible association between remimazolam and postoperative delirium (POD) remains undetermined. The present study evaluated whether remimazolam increased the incidence of POD compared with dexmedetomidine in elderly patients undergoing orthopedic surgery of the lower extremities.

Methods: This retrospective study included patients aged ≥ 65 years who had undergone orthopedic surgery of the lower extremities under spinal anesthesia from January 2020 to November 2022 and were sedated with continuous intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine or remimazolam. The incidence of POD was assessed through a validated comprehensive review process of each patient's medical records. The effect of remimazolam on the occurrence of POD compared with dexmedetomidine was evaluated by propensity score weighted multivariable logistic models.

Results: A total of 447 patients were included in the final analysis. The crude incidence of POD within 3 days after surgery was 7.5% (17/226) in the dexmedetomidine group and 11.8% (26/221) in the remimazolam group, increasing to 9.7% (22/226) and 15.8% (35/221), respectively (p = 0.073), within 5 days. The multivariable models showed that, compared with dexmedetomidine, intraoperative sedation with remimazolam significantly increased the occurrence of POD within 3 days (odds ratio [OR] 2.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31 to 3.82, p = 0.003) and 5 days (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.32 to 3.40, p = 0.002).

Conclusion: Compared with dexmedetomidine, remimazolam infusion may be associated with a higher risk of POD in elderly patients undergoing orthopedic surgery of the lower extremities under spinal anesthesia.

Background: Benzodiazepines are used in pediatric patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) because of their mild hemodynamic depressant effects. A novel short-acting benzodiazepine, remimazolam, is expected to be suitable for these patients. We examined the characteristics of remimazolam anesthesia in pediatric patients with CHD undergoing cardiac catheterization.

Methods: This single-center retrospective study included pediatric patients undergoing cardiac catheterization for CHD. The primary outcome was the remimazolam dose for loss of consciousness. Secondary outcomes included the mean maintenance remimazolam dose, recovery time from anesthesia, predicted remimazolam concentration at emergence, decrease in blood pressure and heart rate, vasopressor administration during anesthesia, electroencephalogram index (bispectral index: BIS or patient state index: PSI), and life-threatening adverse events.

Results: Thirty-nine patients, aged 2 months to 16 years, were included. Thirty-three patients received a median [interquartile] midazolam dose of 0.10 [0.10-0.10] mg.kg^-1 in the pre-anesthesia room. The remimazolam dose for loss of consciousness was 0.34 [0.26-0.45] mg.kg^-1. The mean maintenance dose was 1.0 [0.8-1.4] mg.kg^-1.h^-1. The recovery time was 15 [12-17] min. The predicted remimazolam concentration at emergence was 0.4-1.2 µg.ml^-1 in 3-6-year-old patients. Blood pressure and heart rate decreased by 30% in 15 and 6 patients, respectively. Vasopressors were administered as a bolus in 8 patients. The BIS or PSI did not fall ≤ 60 or ≤ 50, respectively, in 51% of patients before tracheal intubation. No life-threatening adverse events were reported.

Conclusions: Remimazolam is a good alternative anesthetic agent for pediatric patients undergoing cardiac catheterization for CHD.

Ultrasound guidance has been reported to facilitate radial artery catheterization compared with the palpation method. However, a recent meta-analysis showed that there was not significant differences in the first attempt success rate between the long-axis in-plane (LA-IP) method and the short-axis out-of-plane method. In 2023, we started using a novel T-type probe. We can recognize the needle first during the radial artery access with the short-axis view and then dose it with the long-axis view using the T-type probe. Therefore, we hypothesized that the T-type probe-guided method might heighten the first attempt success rate in radial artery catheterization, even for non-expert practitioners, compared with the LA-IP technique. One hundred and fifty adult patients, older than 20 years, ASA I to III, were randomly assigned to the T-type probe-guided group (Group T: n = 75) or the LA-IP group (Group L: n = 75). The primary outcome was the first attempt success rate. The first attempt success rate in Group T (49/71, 69%) was significantly higher than that in Group L (31/68, 46%) (p = 0.0062). The present study showed that the T-type probe might facilitate the radial artery catheterization rather than the LA-IP method.

Purpose: This study aimed to estimate the median effective dose of intrathecal isobaric ropivacaine without opioid required for adequate cesarean delivery anesthesia after epidural labor analgesia.

Methods: Patients aged 20-40 years with American Society of Anesthesiology scores of I-II, body mass index ≤ 36, who underwent emergency cesarean delivery after failed vaginal delivery with epidural analgesia of a duration ≤ 6 h were included in the study. After removal of the epidural used for labor analgesia, a new combined spinal epidural was performed, and a dose of intrathecal isobaric ropivacaine without opioid was administered. The dose was determined using up-down methodology, with the starting patient's dose set to 12 mg. Adequate anesthesia, defined as a pinprick level no lower than T6 at 5 min after ropivacaine administration, resulted in the next patient receiving a dose of ropivacaine 1 mg higher, and inadequate anesthesia 1 mg lower. The primary outcome was the median (95% confidence interval (CI)) dose of spinal ropivacaine required for adequate cesarean delivery anesthesia.

Results: Of the 46 patients included in the study, 40 were analyzed. The median spinal ropivacaine dose was 8.11 mg (95% CI 7.29-8.93 mg) by the Dixon and Mood method and 8.06 mg (95% CI 6.93-9.00 mg) by isotonic regression. Two patients had high spinal anesthesia.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that for 50% of patients undergoing cesarean delivery after failed vaginal delivery with epidural analgesia, an 8-mg spinal dose of isobaric ropivacaine without opioid provides an anesthesia level no lower than T6 at 5 min.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence and risk factors of lower extremity pain and/or numbness after laparoscopic colorectal surgery and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in the lithotomy position combined with the Trendelenburg position. The relationship between creatine kinase (CK) levels and lower extremity pain and/or numbness was also investigated.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed adult patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in the lithotomy position combined with the Trendelenburg position between May 2015 and April 2020. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors of lower extremity pain and/or numbness. Preoperative and postoperative CK levels were compared in patients with and those without lower extremity pain and/or numbness.

Results: Among 940 patients, 1.9% experienced lower extremity pain and/or numbness postoperatively. The incidences of lower extremity pain and/or numbness after laparoscopic colorectal surgery and after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy were 1.7% and 2.1%, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that only duration of surgery > 4 h (odds ratio = 3.144, 95% CI: 1.102-8.969, p = 0.032) was a significant predictor of lower extremity pain and/or numbness. Postoperative median CK level in patients with lower extremity pain and/or numbness was significantly higher than that in patients without lower extremity pain and/or numbness.

Conclusion: The incidence of lower extremity pain and/or numbness after laparoscopic colorectal surgery was comparable to that after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Prolonged duration of surgery contributed to lower extremity pain and/or numbness. Significantly elevated CK levels in patients with lower extremity pain and/or numbness suggest the involvement of muscle injury in these symptoms.

Lung resection surgery, which is performed as a treatment for lung cancer and metastatic lung tumors, is currently conducted via minimally invasive techniques such as video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and robot-assisted methods. Postoperative complications related to this surgery, such as pulmonary vein thrombosis and cerebral and other organ infarctions, have been increasingly reported. The primary cause of these complications is thrombus formation in the pulmonary vein stump. Statistical data on the site of lung lobectomy have indicated that surgeries involving the left upper lobe are most frequently associated with embolic complications. Although this issue has not received considerable attention in anesthesiology, the importance of prevention and treatment in postoperative management is growing. The role of anesthesiologists in preventing these complications is critical. These roles involve careful fluid management to avoid hypercoagulable states, consideration of early postoperative anticoagulation therapy, assessment of the suitability of epidural anesthesia for postoperative anticoagulation, and improvement of hospital-wide safety systems and monitoring of high-risk patients. Anesthesiologists need to understand the pathology and risk factors involved and play an active role in preventing and treating these complications through effective collaboration with thoracic surgeons and the in-hospital stroke team.

Purpose: Prone position has recently gained renewed importance as a treatment for acute respiratory distress syndrome and spine and brain surgeries. Our study aimed to perform an error grid analysis to examine the clinical discrepancies between arterial blood pressure (ABP) and non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) in the prone position and to investigate the risk factors influencing these differences.

Methods: Error grid analysis was performed retrospectively on 1389 pairs of 100 consecutive prone positioning cases. This analysis classifies the difference between the two methods into five clinically relevant zones, from "no risk" to "dangerous risk". Additionally, multivariable ordinal logistic regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the relationship between the risk zones of mean blood pressure (MBP), as classified by error grid analysis and the covariate of interest.

Results: Error grid analysis showed that the proportions of measurement pairs in risk zones A-E for systolic blood pressure were 96.8%, 3.2%, 0.1%, 0%, and 0%, respectively. In contrast, the MBP proportions were 74.0%, 25.1%, 0.9%, 0.1%, and 0%. Multivariable ordinal logistic regression analysis revealed that the position of arms (next to the head) was a significant factor (adjusted odds ratio: 4.35, 95% CI: 2.38-8.33, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Error grid analysis revealed a clinically unacceptable discrepancy between ABP and NIBP for MBP during prone positioning surgery. The position of the arms next to the head was associated with increased clinical discrepancy between the two MBP measurement methods.