Evaluation of skin cancer screening in Germany - a Microsimulation.

IF 5.5 4区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Journal Der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft Pub Date : 2024-11-09 DOI:10.1111/ddg.15539
Hannah Baltus, Joachim Hübner, Claudia Garbe, Kristina Hagenström, Maren Rohr, Sandra Hischke, Jobst Augustin, Matthias Augustin, Alexander Katalinic, Nora Eisemann
{"title":"Evaluation of skin cancer screening in Germany - a Microsimulation.","authors":"Hannah Baltus, Joachim Hübner, Claudia Garbe, Kristina Hagenström, Maren Rohr, Sandra Hischke, Jobst Augustin, Matthias Augustin, Alexander Katalinic, Nora Eisemann","doi":"10.1111/ddg.15539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Comprehensive skin cancer screening was introduced in Germany in 2008. It is unclear whether subsequently observed changes in the epidemiology of malignant melanoma (MM), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and basal cell carcinoma (BCC) are due to the screening. Simulation models are used to compare different screening scenarios with each other and with observed incidence and mortality trends.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A microsimulation model for MM, SCC, and BCC was programmed and validated separately by sex on skin cancer-specific mortality data. In addition to the currently practiced screening (biennial offer, annual participation probability 15%), triennial screening, screening with increased participation, e.g., via invitation, and no screening were simulated. Incidence, mortality, costs, and life-years gained were simulated for 30 years from the start of screening.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with no screening, mortality is reduced by 13.8% in the simulation with current conditions. This effect occurs in the first years after screening starts before reaching a stable level. More screening allows for further increases in incidence, life-years gained, and costs and decreases in mortality. Comparing simulated and observed effects shows little agreement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The model is useful for comparing screening scenarios to identify potential optimization opportunities in SCS. Additional, especially risk-adapted, screening scenarios should be investigated.</p>","PeriodicalId":14758,"journal":{"name":"Journal Der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal Der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ddg.15539","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Comprehensive skin cancer screening was introduced in Germany in 2008. It is unclear whether subsequently observed changes in the epidemiology of malignant melanoma (MM), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and basal cell carcinoma (BCC) are due to the screening. Simulation models are used to compare different screening scenarios with each other and with observed incidence and mortality trends.

Methods: A microsimulation model for MM, SCC, and BCC was programmed and validated separately by sex on skin cancer-specific mortality data. In addition to the currently practiced screening (biennial offer, annual participation probability 15%), triennial screening, screening with increased participation, e.g., via invitation, and no screening were simulated. Incidence, mortality, costs, and life-years gained were simulated for 30 years from the start of screening.

Results: Compared with no screening, mortality is reduced by 13.8% in the simulation with current conditions. This effect occurs in the first years after screening starts before reaching a stable level. More screening allows for further increases in incidence, life-years gained, and costs and decreases in mortality. Comparing simulated and observed effects shows little agreement.

Conclusions: The model is useful for comparing screening scenarios to identify potential optimization opportunities in SCS. Additional, especially risk-adapted, screening scenarios should be investigated.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
德国皮肤癌筛查评估--微观模拟。
背景:德国于 2008 年引入了全面皮肤癌筛查。目前尚不清楚随后观察到的恶性黑色素瘤(MM)、鳞状细胞癌(SCC)和基底细胞癌(BCC)流行病学的变化是否与筛查有关。模拟模型用于比较不同筛查方案之间的差异以及观察到的发病率和死亡率趋势:方法:对 MM、SCC 和 BCC 的微观模拟模型进行了编程,并根据皮肤癌特定死亡率数据按性别分别进行了验证。除了目前实行的筛查(两年一次,每年参与概率为 15%)外,还模拟了三年一次的筛查、通过邀请等方式提高参与率的筛查以及不进行筛查的情况。对筛查开始后 30 年内的发病率、死亡率、成本和寿命进行了模拟:结果:与不进行筛查相比,在当前条件下模拟的死亡率降低了 13.8%。这一效果出现在筛查开始后的最初几年,然后达到一个稳定的水平。增加筛查可进一步提高发病率、延长寿命、降低成本和死亡率。比较模拟效果和观察效果几乎没有发现一致之处:该模型有助于比较筛查方案,以确定 SCS 潜在的优化机会。应研究更多的筛查方案,尤其是适应风险的方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
25.00%
发文量
406
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The JDDG publishes scientific papers from a wide range of disciplines, such as dermatovenereology, allergology, phlebology, dermatosurgery, dermatooncology, and dermatohistopathology. Also in JDDG: information on medical training, continuing education, a calendar of events, book reviews and society announcements. Papers can be submitted in German or English language. In the print version, all articles are published in German. In the online version, all key articles are published in English.
期刊最新文献
Itchy zosteriform erythema in the thoracic region in a 30-year-old man. Disseminated erythematous nodules in a 39-year-old man. Impact of a dermatological rehabilitation program on cardiovascular risks of psoriasis patients. A firm nodule on the nasal tip. Cutaneous methotrexate-related lymphoproliferative disorder mimicking nodular lymphangitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1