Evaluation of the Stronger Together Peer Mentoring Model Among Patients With Breast and Gynecologic Cancer in Viet Nam.

IF 3.2 Q2 ONCOLOGY JCO Global Oncology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1200/GO.24.00031
PhuongThao D Le, Carolyn Taylor, Mai T Do, Rachel Monahan, Sang Lee, Meenakshi Sigireddi, Cong Wang, Anna Cabanes, Ophira Ginsburg, Thanh Huong T Tran
{"title":"Evaluation of the Stronger Together Peer Mentoring Model Among Patients With Breast and Gynecologic Cancer in Viet Nam.","authors":"PhuongThao D Le, Carolyn Taylor, Mai T Do, Rachel Monahan, Sang Lee, Meenakshi Sigireddi, Cong Wang, Anna Cabanes, Ophira Ginsburg, Thanh Huong T Tran","doi":"10.1200/GO.24.00031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Stronger Together is a peer mentoring model that seeks to address the severe lack of mental health and psychosocial support for patients with cancer in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This article presents the results of the Stronger Together pilot study among patients with breast and gynecologic cancer in Viet Nam (VN).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligible participants comprised women age 25 years or older with a diagnosis of breast or gynecologic cancers and receiving treatment at four participating hospitals. Participants were asked whether they wanted to proceed with usual care or be matched with a trained and supervised peer mentor (a cancer survivor). Surveys were administered at baseline (0) and 2, 4, and 6 months and assessed depression, anxiety, stress, mental health and physical health components of quality of life (QOL), self-efficacy, and social support. We computed and compared 2-, 4-, and 6-month changes in scores from baseline and conducted difference-in-difference analyses to estimate the intervention effect at 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample size included N = 186 participants. Mentees (n = 91) exhibited improvements in depression, anxiety, stress, and mental health QOL across all time points, whereas usual care participants (n = 95) experienced these improvements at later periods (4 and 6 months). Compared with usual care participants, mentees reported greater improvements in depression at 2 and 4 months, mental health QOL at all time points, and self-efficacy and social support at 4 and 6 months. Greater improvements in stress were also seen in the breast cancer subsample.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Stronger Together is a promising model to improve mental health and psychosocial outcomes among patients with breast and gynecologic cancer in VN and can help fill gaps in cancer peer support interventions in many LMICs.</p>","PeriodicalId":14806,"journal":{"name":"JCO Global Oncology","volume":"10 ","pages":"e2400031"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11567052/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO Global Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/GO.24.00031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Stronger Together is a peer mentoring model that seeks to address the severe lack of mental health and psychosocial support for patients with cancer in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This article presents the results of the Stronger Together pilot study among patients with breast and gynecologic cancer in Viet Nam (VN).

Methods: Eligible participants comprised women age 25 years or older with a diagnosis of breast or gynecologic cancers and receiving treatment at four participating hospitals. Participants were asked whether they wanted to proceed with usual care or be matched with a trained and supervised peer mentor (a cancer survivor). Surveys were administered at baseline (0) and 2, 4, and 6 months and assessed depression, anxiety, stress, mental health and physical health components of quality of life (QOL), self-efficacy, and social support. We computed and compared 2-, 4-, and 6-month changes in scores from baseline and conducted difference-in-difference analyses to estimate the intervention effect at 6 months.

Results: The sample size included N = 186 participants. Mentees (n = 91) exhibited improvements in depression, anxiety, stress, and mental health QOL across all time points, whereas usual care participants (n = 95) experienced these improvements at later periods (4 and 6 months). Compared with usual care participants, mentees reported greater improvements in depression at 2 and 4 months, mental health QOL at all time points, and self-efficacy and social support at 4 and 6 months. Greater improvements in stress were also seen in the breast cancer subsample.

Conclusion: Stronger Together is a promising model to improve mental health and psychosocial outcomes among patients with breast and gynecologic cancer in VN and can help fill gaps in cancer peer support interventions in many LMICs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
越南乳腺癌和妇科癌症患者 "强强联手 "同伴指导模式评估。
目的:Stronger Together 是一种同伴指导模式,旨在解决许多中低收入国家(LMIC)癌症患者严重缺乏心理健康和社会心理支持的问题。本文介绍了在越南(VN)乳腺癌和妇科癌症患者中开展的 "强强联手 "试点研究的结果:符合条件的参与者包括年龄在 25 岁或以上、确诊患有乳腺癌或妇科癌症并在四家参与医院接受治疗的女性。参与者被问及是愿意继续接受常规治疗,还是愿意与经过培训并接受监督的同伴导师(癌症幸存者)配对。在基线(0)和 2、4、6 个月时进行调查,评估抑郁、焦虑、压力、生活质量 (QOL) 的心理健康和身体健康组成部分、自我效能和社会支持。我们计算并比较了 2 个月、4 个月和 6 个月的基线分数变化,并进行了差异分析,以估计 6 个月时的干预效果:样本量包括 N = 186 名参与者。在所有时间点上,被辅导者(n = 91)的抑郁、焦虑、压力和心理健康QOL都有所改善,而常规护理参与者(n = 95)在后期(4个月和6个月)才有所改善。与常规护理参与者相比,被指导者在 2 个月和 4 个月时的抑郁程度、所有时间点的心理健康 QOL 以及 4 个月和 6 个月时的自我效能和社会支持方面均有较大改善。在乳腺癌子样本中,压力方面的改善也更明显:结论:"强强联手 "是一种很有前景的模式,可改善越南乳腺癌和妇科癌症患者的心理健康和心理社会结果,并有助于填补许多低收入国家癌症同伴支持干预的空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JCO Global Oncology
JCO Global Oncology Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
310
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Beliefs on Causes of Cancer in the General Population, and the Association With Risk Perception and Lifestyle in a Multiethnic Setting. Efficacy and Safety of Biosimilar Cetuximab Versus Innovator Cetuximab in Indian Patients With Head and Neck Cancer: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Trial. Evaluation of the Stronger Together Peer Mentoring Model Among Patients With Breast and Gynecologic Cancer in Viet Nam. Germline Genetic Susceptibility Testing Among Emirati Nationals at Risk for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. Health-Related Quality of Life and Financial Burden in Ethiopian Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Receiving Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: A Cross-Sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1