JCO Global Oncology最新文献

Purpose: Metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) poses a challenge to health care systems, given its treatment complexity and mortality. We aimed to describe the characteristics, treatment patterns, and survival outcomes of Mexican patients with mUC.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted across eight centers for adults with mUC from January /2001 to December 2021. We recorded medical history, eligibility for first-line platinum therapy, treatment lines received, and access to novel drugs. Descriptive statistics were used and survival analysis, including Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards model, was performed.

Results: We identified 379 patients with mUC; 37 were excluded, and 76% was male, with a median age of 67 years. The median follow-up was 8.4 months. Among those who received a first-line treatment (65%), cisplatin-based chemotherapy (45%) was the most common followed by carboplatin (39%). Causes of cisplatin ineligibility were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ≥2 (41%) and glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min (33%). The overall response rate to up-front platinum therapy was 33%, with a median progression-free survival of 6.1 months (95% CI, 4.9 to 6.9). Second-, third-, and fourth-line treatment was given to 24.6%, 8.8%, and 3.5%, respectively. Chemotherapy was the most common regimen prescribed. Access to novel drugs was limited, 14 patients received avelumab, and 25% received immunotherapy as second-line treatment. The median overall survival was 11.8 months (95% CI, 10.2 to 15.2). Multivariate analysis showed that first-line treatment was independently associated with better survival, whereas poor performance status and visceral disease were associated with worse survival.

Conclusion: To our knowledge, these data represent the first effort to delineate treatment trends of mUC in Mexico. First-line treatment prescription and rates of progression to platinum therapy were higher than those described worldwide. Factors affecting survival included performance status, first-line treatment, and visceral disease. Our study highlights unequal access to novel treatments, underscoring the need for equitable care.

Purpose: Cancer constitutes a significant global health challenge, with projections indicating a continued increase in its prevalence in the foreseeable future. This trend is particularly pronounced in Latin America (LATAM), where the cancer burden has increased substantially over the coming decades. Concurrently, nursing, which represents the largest segment of the health care workforce globally, is important for addressing the multifaceted challenges posed by cancer care, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Despite the essential role of nursing in cancer care, several barriers hinder its optimal contribution, particularly in LMICs. These challenges include professional hierarchy, insufficient educational standards, underfunding for research, and limited representation in decision-making processes.

Methods: To address these challenges, collaborative initiatives, such as the INCREASE Proposal, have emerged, aimed at fostering interdisciplinary dialogue and action in oncology nursing within LATAM. Through focused workshops and agile methodologies, the INCREASE Proposal seeks to identify barriers and formulate solutions across key areas including education, research, clinical practice, and policy implementation.

Results: The outcomes of the INCREASE Proposal underscore the urgent need for comprehensive strategies to strengthen oncology nursing in the LATAM. These strategies include enhancing education and recognition within health care systems, fostering interdisciplinary collaboration, leveraging advanced technologies, conducting cost-benefit analyses, and promoting research-academic partnerships.

Conclusion: By addressing these challenges and implementing the proposed solutions, LATAM can advance toward optimized oncology nursing practice, improving cancer care delivery and outcomes across the region.

Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on breast cancer care in terms of the stage at presentation, treatment delays, and follow-up in a tertiary care center in Lebanon.

Materials and methods: This retrospective study compared patients with breast cancer who presented to a tertiary care center in Lebanon before (September 2019-December 2019) and during (September 2020-December 2020) the COVID-19 pandemic. We extracted data from the electronic medical records of patients with breast cancer who had their initial presentation, were under treatment, or were on follow-up during our period of interest.

Results: Of the 333 patients, 186 visited the hospital in the pre-COVID-19 period and 147 during the pandemic, showing almost a 12% reduction in the number of patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. In the pre-COVID period, more patients were presented for screening (52%); however, more symptomatic patients were presented during the pandemic (51.4%). Almost 54% had an advanced stage at presentation during the pandemic compared with 48% before the pandemic but with no statistical significance (P = .50). Significantly fewer patients came for chemotherapy in the COVID-19 period (38.1%) compared with the pre-COVID-19 period (52.2%). Fewer patients underwent surgery during the pandemic, although the difference was not statistically significant. Multivariate analysis showed that the COVID-19 pandemic was not associated with having an advanced stage at presentation (P = .24).

Conclusion: The management of breast cancer was not substantially affected by the COVID-19 pandemic in a sample of Lebanese patients. However, 4 months might not be sufficient to draw a solid conclusion.

Purpose: Stigma contributes to fear and shame, resulting in delays in care-seeking behavior among individuals with cancer. As a social construct, stigma is affected by language, religion, culture, and local norms. This study explored pediatric cancer stigma at the time of diagnosis across diverse settings through the adaptation of two stigma measures.

Methods: This study was conducted with adolescents and caregivers of children with osteosarcoma and retinoblastoma at three centers in Jordan, Guatemala, and Zimbabwe. The Stigma-related Social Problems (SSP) and the eight-item Stigma Scale for Chronic Illness (SSCI-8) measures were translated into Arabic, Spanish, and Shona and contextually adapted for use with adolescents and caregiver proxies. Adapted measures were pilot-tested and iteratively revised.

Results: Extensive adaptations were made to both measures to make them relevant to the local pediatric contexts. The final measures were used in nine patients and 28 caregivers. The exploratory analysis found that domain-specific and overall scale scores for both measures indicate a higher level of stigma than those found in previous studies (SSP: patient [51.23], caregiver [40.74]; SSCI-8: patient [50.41], caregiver [49.78]). Paired, patient-caregiver proxy responses were analyzed, with disagreement between the pairs for both scales.

Conclusion: Adapted measures detected high levels of stigma among patients with pediatric cancer and their caregiver proxies and demonstrated a lack of concordance in the reports. This suggests the importance of studying stigma in this population and the need to ask patients about their stigma without using proxy measures. The required adaptations suggest a need for stigma measures developed specifically for pediatric cancer.

Purpose: The incidence and survival rates of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) vary globally, influenced by factors such as ethnicity, lifestyle, and health care systems.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with HNSCC treated between 2008 and 2020 in four major Thai academic cancer centers, using a multidisciplinary multicenter database. The study focused on the evolution of patient characteristics, survival changes, and treatment landscape alterations over time.

Results: Among 6,319 patients, the most common primary sites were nasopharynx (33%), oral cavity (23%), oropharynx (17%), larynx (15%), and hypopharynx (8%). An increase in human papillomavirus-related oropharyngeal carcinoma was noted, from 13% in 2008 to 42% in 2019-2020. The majority of patients presented with locally advanced (LA) stages (IVa/b: 50%, III: 26%). Chemoradiotherapy (54%) and surgery (24%) were the main treatments, with cisplatin (79%) being most commonly used in chemoradiation. Overall survival (OS) improved annually across all subsites, correlating with an increase in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) use, from 25% in 2008 to 90% in 2019-2020. The median follow-up duration was 4.59 years, with a minimum of 2.75 years. Patients treated with IMRT had significantly longer OS compared with those treated with non-IMRT techniques, in both NPC and non-NPC HNSCC (P < .001).

Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the largest study in Thailand that demonstrates increasing survival outcomes in patients with HNSCC and NPC, despite commonly presenting with LA stages. The increasing use of IMRT may be contributing to improved survival outcomes in both patients with NPC and non-NPC HNSCC patients.

Purpose: Hereditary cancer syndromes (HCS) explain 5%-10% of all cancer cases. Patients with more than one germline pathogenic variant (GPV) result in a clinical syndrome known as multilocus inherited neoplasia allele syndrome (MINAS). In recent years, an increasing number of MINAS cases have been reported. This study aims to identify the prevalence of MINAS and determine the effect of two GPVs in HCS on patients from Northern Mexico.

Methods: Patients (N = 2,282) were recruited from four public oncology centers and two private institutions with hereditary cancer detection programs in Nuevo León, México. A medical geneticist collected all the patient's clinical data and gave genetic counseling. Patients with MINAS were detected using multigene panels to detect GPVs; findings were classified according to American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines. The genetic data of patients with MINAS were evaluated by their frequency and combination.

Results: We found 386 (16.9%) patients with one or more variants and 23 (5.9%) MINAS patients (all females). The most frequent diagnosis was breast cancer (BC) in 20 (86.95%) cases, whereas 16 (69.56%) had triple-negative BC. We found 13 patients with BRCA1 GPVs (56.52%) as the most frequent, followed by MUTYH with five cases (21.73%). The combinations of BRCA1/CHEK2, BRCA1/CDKN2A, and BRCA1/BRCA2 were the most frequent. We found no atypical presentation in the cohort.

Conclusion: This is the first Mexican MINAS report and the largest Latin American cohort. We detected a higher prevalence of MINAS than other populations (5.9%). We found a tendency for additive phenotypical effect and, in some MINAS combinations, a modification in the age of diagnosis.

Purpose: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-positive Burkitt lymphoma (BL) affects children in sub-Saharan Africa, but diagnosis via tissue biopsy is challenging. We explored a liquid biopsy approach using targeted next-generation sequencing to detect the MYC-immunoglobulin (MYC-Ig) translocation and EBV DNA, assessing its potential for minimally invasive BL diagnosis.

Materials and methods: The panel included targets for the characteristic MYC-Ig translocation, mutations in intron 1 of MYC, mutations in exon 2 of MYC, and three EBV genes: EBV-encoded RNA (EBER)1, EBER2, and EBV nuclear antigen 2. It was first tested in a small derivation cohort of four precharacterized BL-derived cell lines with known translocation status and eight precharacterized plasma samples with known EBV DNA status by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). These different data modalities were combined to assess the accuracy of this approach in the diagnosis of BL in 20 patient plasma samples in Tanzania and Uganda.

Results: The next-generation sequencing panel detected three of four MYC-Ig translocations in the BL-derived cell lines. EBV viral load by targeted sequencing correlated strongly with qPCR results (Spearman's rho = 0.94) in precharacterized plasma samples. Using the patient plasma samples, mutations in MYC intron 1 were associated with the presence of a MYC translocation with 25 or more mutations being predictive of a translocation with AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of 1. Overall, liquid biopsy parameters associated with a diagnosis of BL (P < .05) included cell-free DNA concentration, circulating tumor DNA concentration, MYC intron 1 mutations, MYC-Ig translocation, and autosome entropy. Integrating these parameters into a diagnostic model demonstrated excellent performance with an AUC of 0.95, sensitivity of 0.9, and specificity of 1.

Conclusion: This analysis demonstrates the potential of liquid biopsy to improve BL diagnosis in settings with limited pathology resources. Validation of our approach in a larger data set is needed.

Purpose: The spectrum of EGFR is inadequately researched in patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in India. EARLY-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) India (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04742192), as part of a noninterventional, real-world global study, evaluated the prevalence of EGFR mutations in early-stage NSCLC in India.

Methods: Prospective data from adult patients with surgically resected stage IA to IIIB (American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition) NSCLC between March 2021 and October 2022 were analyzed. In addition to descriptive statistics, Fisher's exact test with Monte Carlo was used to determine the association between EGFR mutations and clinicodemographic parameters.

Results: Of 74 patients (median age, 57.0 [range, 33.0-77.0] years) enrolled from eight centers in India, 73.0% (54 of 74) were males, 56.1% (37 of 66) were nonsmokers, and 95.9% (71 of 74) had adenocarcinoma. The EGFR mutation prevalence was 26.0% (19 of 73), of which Exon-19 deletions were the predominant subtype (13, 68.4%) followed by Exon 21-L858R (4, 21.1%), Exon 20-T790M (1, 5.3%), and compound (1, 5.3%) mutations. Nearly half (48.6%, 36 of 74) of the patients underwent only surgical resection. The remaining 51.4% (38 of 74) of the patients were prescribed neoadjuvant (n = 12; 16.2%) and adjuvant (n = 31; 41.9%) systemic therapies, and one patient (1.4%) received radiotherapy along with systemic therapy. In 60 patients with stage IB to IIIB NSCLC, systemic therapies, mainly platinum-based chemotherapy, were prescribed in 36 (60.0%). Only 8.1% (6 of 74) of the patients were prescribed EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), of which two received neoadjuvant and four were planned for adjuvant EGFR-TKI. Two (2.7%) patients were prescribed adjuvant immunotherapy. The univariate analysis showed higher odds of EGFR mutation for females (odds ratio, 3.96; P = .017).

Conclusion: EARLY-EGFR India results showed the prevalence of EGFR mutation to be 26%. The study emphasized the pressing need for up-front biomarker testing at diagnosis to ensure optimal and timely personalized treatment.