E.H.S. Teule , S.A.W. van de Groes , G. Hannink , N. Verdonschot , D. Janssen
{"title":"Exploring healthy knee kinematic phenotypes obtained through dynamic CT imaging: A cluster analysis study","authors":"E.H.S. Teule , S.A.W. van de Groes , G. Hannink , N. Verdonschot , D. Janssen","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Dynamic Computed Tomography (CT) emerges as a pivotal imaging modality for the assessment of knee joint kinematics. However, integrating dynamic CT into clinical practice necessitates a thorough understanding of healthy knee kinematics, as large variation in kinematics has been described within healthy populations. Therefore, this study aims to identify and describe healthy phenotypes with homogenous knee kinematics using a clustering approach. A total of 120 healthy knees from 64 participants underwent dynamic CT scanning during knee extension and flexion. Eight tibiofemoral (TF) and patellofemoral kinematic parameters were extracted, after which K-means clustering was applied to identify homogenous kinematic clusters. Kinematic phenotypes were obtained by calculating the median and interquartile range (IQR) for all kinematic parameters per cluster. Two distinct clusters were found, comprising 53 (Cluster 1) and 67 (Cluster 2) knees. Statistically significant differences between the clusters were found in six out of eight kinematic parameters. The most notable differences were observed in TF rotations, with cluster 1 exhibiting a greater amount of internal and adduction rotation of the tibia compared to cluster 2. The two kinematic phenotypes provide new insights into the nuanced variation within a healthy cohort and can serve as reference for future studies evaluating pathological kinematic phenotypes using dynamic CT.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"177 ","pages":"Article 112402"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929024004809","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Dynamic Computed Tomography (CT) emerges as a pivotal imaging modality for the assessment of knee joint kinematics. However, integrating dynamic CT into clinical practice necessitates a thorough understanding of healthy knee kinematics, as large variation in kinematics has been described within healthy populations. Therefore, this study aims to identify and describe healthy phenotypes with homogenous knee kinematics using a clustering approach. A total of 120 healthy knees from 64 participants underwent dynamic CT scanning during knee extension and flexion. Eight tibiofemoral (TF) and patellofemoral kinematic parameters were extracted, after which K-means clustering was applied to identify homogenous kinematic clusters. Kinematic phenotypes were obtained by calculating the median and interquartile range (IQR) for all kinematic parameters per cluster. Two distinct clusters were found, comprising 53 (Cluster 1) and 67 (Cluster 2) knees. Statistically significant differences between the clusters were found in six out of eight kinematic parameters. The most notable differences were observed in TF rotations, with cluster 1 exhibiting a greater amount of internal and adduction rotation of the tibia compared to cluster 2. The two kinematic phenotypes provide new insights into the nuanced variation within a healthy cohort and can serve as reference for future studies evaluating pathological kinematic phenotypes using dynamic CT.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership.
Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to:
-Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells.
-Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions.
-Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response.
-Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing.
-Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine.
-Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction.
-Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules.
-Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints.
-Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics.
-Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.