Arthroscopically assisted accurate location of the bone tunnel entrance for lateral ankle ligament reconstruction may be a better choice for patients with chronic ankle instability: a retrospective study.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1186/s13018-024-05251-4
Zechen Yan, Chen Zhuang, Wenhuan Chen, Yu Pan, Xiangke Wu, Rujie Zhuang, Wenxuan Guo
{"title":"Arthroscopically assisted accurate location of the bone tunnel entrance for lateral ankle ligament reconstruction may be a better choice for patients with chronic ankle instability: a retrospective study.","authors":"Zechen Yan, Chen Zhuang, Wenhuan Chen, Yu Pan, Xiangke Wu, Rujie Zhuang, Wenxuan Guo","doi":"10.1186/s13018-024-05251-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The anatomical location for lateral ligament reconstruction remains a significant challenge. With the development of arthroscopic technology, arthroscopic-assisted lateral ligament reconstruction can significantly facilitate the correct localization of anatomical points. However, there is limited evidence on the clinical efficacy of arthroscopic ligament reconstruction compared with percutaneous ligament reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 72 patients who underwent lateral ligament reconstruction for chronic lateral ankle instability from 2018 to 2022. The follow-up duration in the percutaneous(n = 35) and the arthroscopic(n = 37) groups was 6-30 months. The patients were evaluated before the operation, at 6 months after surgery, and at the final follow-up. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score (AOFAS), Karlsson-Peterson score, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were evaluated at each time point. The complications and the time required to return to sports were documented during the follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All clinical evaluations significantly improved after surgery in both groups. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the AOFAS score, VAS score, and complications. The Karlsson-Peterson score (85.4 vs 83.6, p = 0.044), surgical duration (50.4 min vs 60.2 min, p < 0.001), and time to return to sports (17.8 weeks vs 20.5 weeks, p = 0.033) were all improved in the arthroscopic group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Satisfactory clinical outcomes can be achieved through both arthroscopic and percutaneous anatomic ligament reconstruction. The ligament remnant and anatomical localization point can be observed directly by using an arthroscope. Arthroscopic ligament reconstruction can be a more viable alternative for patients with chronic ankle instability due to its minimal disturbance to the stump of the ligament and reduced operative aggression.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":"19 1","pages":"760"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11566172/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05251-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The anatomical location for lateral ligament reconstruction remains a significant challenge. With the development of arthroscopic technology, arthroscopic-assisted lateral ligament reconstruction can significantly facilitate the correct localization of anatomical points. However, there is limited evidence on the clinical efficacy of arthroscopic ligament reconstruction compared with percutaneous ligament reconstruction.

Methods: This study included 72 patients who underwent lateral ligament reconstruction for chronic lateral ankle instability from 2018 to 2022. The follow-up duration in the percutaneous(n = 35) and the arthroscopic(n = 37) groups was 6-30 months. The patients were evaluated before the operation, at 6 months after surgery, and at the final follow-up. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score (AOFAS), Karlsson-Peterson score, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were evaluated at each time point. The complications and the time required to return to sports were documented during the follow-up.

Results: All clinical evaluations significantly improved after surgery in both groups. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the AOFAS score, VAS score, and complications. The Karlsson-Peterson score (85.4 vs 83.6, p = 0.044), surgical duration (50.4 min vs 60.2 min, p < 0.001), and time to return to sports (17.8 weeks vs 20.5 weeks, p = 0.033) were all improved in the arthroscopic group.

Conclusion: Satisfactory clinical outcomes can be achieved through both arthroscopic and percutaneous anatomic ligament reconstruction. The ligament remnant and anatomical localization point can be observed directly by using an arthroscope. Arthroscopic ligament reconstruction can be a more viable alternative for patients with chronic ankle instability due to its minimal disturbance to the stump of the ligament and reduced operative aggression.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慢性踝关节不稳患者在关节镜辅助下准确定位骨隧道入口进行外踝韧带重建可能是更好的选择:一项回顾性研究。
背景:外侧韧带重建的解剖位置仍然是一项重大挑战。随着关节镜技术的发展,关节镜辅助下的外侧韧带重建术可大大促进解剖点的正确定位。然而,与经皮韧带重建术相比,关节镜下韧带重建术的临床疗效证据有限:本研究纳入了2018年至2022年期间因慢性外侧踝关节不稳而接受外侧韧带重建术的72例患者。经皮组(35 例)和关节镜组(37 例)的随访时间均为 6-30 个月。对患者进行了术前、术后6个月和最终随访评估。在每个时间点对美国骨科足踝协会评分(AOFAS)、卡尔森-彼得森评分和视觉模拟量表(VAS)进行评估。随访期间记录了并发症和恢复运动所需时间:结果:两组患者术后的所有临床评估结果均有明显改善。两组患者的 AOFAS 评分、VAS 评分和并发症无明显差异。卡尔森-佩特森评分(85.4 分 vs 83.6 分,p = 0.044)、手术时间(50.4 分钟 vs 60.2 分钟,p 结论:手术后,两组患者均能获得满意的临床疗效:关节镜和经皮解剖韧带重建术都能取得令人满意的临床效果。使用关节镜可以直接观察到韧带残余和解剖定位点。关节镜下韧带重建术对韧带残端干扰最小,手术创伤也较小,因此对于慢性踝关节不稳定患者来说是一种更可行的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues. Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications. JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.
期刊最新文献
Exosomes secreted from human-derived adipose stem cells prevent progression of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Risk factors of short-term residual low back pain after PKP for the first thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. Correction: Oblique lateral internal fusion combined with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in severe lumbar spinal stenosis: clinical and radiographic outcome. Forearm bone mineral density as a predictor of adjacent vertebral refracture after percutaneous kyphoplasty in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a retrospective analysis. Global incidence of osteonecrosis of the femoral head after femoral neck fracture surgery in adolescents: a meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1