Advancements in MELD score and its impact in Hepatology.

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Seminars in liver disease Pub Date : 2024-11-08 DOI:10.1055/a-2464-9543
David Hudson, Francisco Javier Valentin Cortez, Ivonne Hurtado Diaz de Leon, Gurpreet Malhi, Angelica Rivas, Tamoor Afzaal, Mahsa Rahmany Rad, Luis Antonio Diaz, Mohammad Qasim Khan, Juan Pablo Arab
{"title":"Advancements in MELD score and its impact in Hepatology.","authors":"David Hudson, Francisco Javier Valentin Cortez, Ivonne Hurtado Diaz de Leon, Gurpreet Malhi, Angelica Rivas, Tamoor Afzaal, Mahsa Rahmany Rad, Luis Antonio Diaz, Mohammad Qasim Khan, Juan Pablo Arab","doi":"10.1055/a-2464-9543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There continues to be an ongoing need for fair and equitable organ allocation. The Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score has evolved as a calculated framework to evaluate and allocate patients for liver transplantation objectively. The original MELD score has undergone multiple modifications as it is continuously scrutinized for its accuracy in objectively representing the clinical context of patients with liver disease. Several refinements and iterations of the score have been developed, including the widely accepted MELD-Na score. In addition, the most recent updated iteration, MELD 3.0, has been created. The MELD 3.0 calculator incorporates new variables such as patient sex and serum albumin levels and assigns new weights for serum sodium, bilirubin, international normalized ratio, and creatinine levels. It is anticipated that the use of MELD 3.0 scores will reduce overall waitlist mortality and enhance access for female liver transplant candidates. However, despite the emergence of the MELD score as one of the most objective measures for fair organ allocation, various countries and healthcare systems employ alternative methods for stratification and organ allocation. This review article highlights the origins of the MELD score, its iterations, the current MELD 3.0, and future directions for managing liver transplantation organ allocation.</p>","PeriodicalId":21724,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in liver disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in liver disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2464-9543","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There continues to be an ongoing need for fair and equitable organ allocation. The Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score has evolved as a calculated framework to evaluate and allocate patients for liver transplantation objectively. The original MELD score has undergone multiple modifications as it is continuously scrutinized for its accuracy in objectively representing the clinical context of patients with liver disease. Several refinements and iterations of the score have been developed, including the widely accepted MELD-Na score. In addition, the most recent updated iteration, MELD 3.0, has been created. The MELD 3.0 calculator incorporates new variables such as patient sex and serum albumin levels and assigns new weights for serum sodium, bilirubin, international normalized ratio, and creatinine levels. It is anticipated that the use of MELD 3.0 scores will reduce overall waitlist mortality and enhance access for female liver transplant candidates. However, despite the emergence of the MELD score as one of the most objective measures for fair organ allocation, various countries and healthcare systems employ alternative methods for stratification and organ allocation. This review article highlights the origins of the MELD score, its iterations, the current MELD 3.0, and future directions for managing liver transplantation organ allocation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MELD 评分的进展及其对肝病学的影响。
公平公正的器官分配一直是人们的需求。终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分已发展成为一个计算框架,用于客观评估和分配肝移植患者。最初的MELD评分经过多次修改,因为它在客观反映肝病患者临床情况方面的准确性不断受到审查。对该评分进行了多次改进和迭代,其中包括广为接受的 MELD-Na 评分。此外,最新更新的迭代版 MELD 3.0 也已问世。MELD 3.0 计算器纳入了患者性别和血清白蛋白水平等新变量,并为血清钠、胆红素、国际标准化比率和肌酐水平分配了新权重。预计MELD 3.0评分的使用将降低候选者的总死亡率,并提高女性肝移植候选者的机会。然而,尽管 MELD 评分已成为公平分配器官的最客观指标之一,但不同国家和医疗系统仍采用其他方法进行分层和器官分配。这篇综述文章重点介绍了MELD评分的起源、迭代、当前的MELD 3.0以及管理肝移植器官分配的未来方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in liver disease
Seminars in liver disease 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
2.40%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Seminars in Liver Disease is a quarterly review journal that publishes issues related to the specialties of hepatology and gastroenterology. As the premiere review journal in the field, Seminars in Liver Disease provides in-depth coverage with articles and issues focusing on topics such as cirrhosis, transplantation, vascular and coagulation disorders, cytokines, hepatitis B & C, Nonalcoholic Steatosis Syndromes (NASH), pediatric liver diseases, hepatic stem cells, porphyrias as well as a myriad of other diseases related to the liver. Attention is also given to the latest developments in drug therapy along with treatment and current management techniques. Seminars in Liver Disease publishes commissioned reviews. Unsolicited reviews of an exceptional nature or original articles presenting remarkable results will be considered, but case reports will not be published.
期刊最新文献
Role of the Gut Microbiome in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease. HBV Biomarkers and Their Role in Guiding Treatment Decisions. Patient-Reported Outcomes in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease. Managing Multiorgan Failure in Acute on Chronic Liver Failure. Advancements in MELD score and its impact in Hepatology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1