{"title":"Disparities in trends of smoke-free home associated with socioeconomic disadvantages in the United States from 2001 to 2019","authors":"Boram Lee , Douglas E. Levy","doi":"10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.108173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To examine disparities in trends of smoke-free home (SFH) rule prevalence in the United States from 2001 to 2019 by individuals' number of socioeconomic disadvantages.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data were drawn from the 2001–2019 Tobacco Use Supplements to the U.S. Current Population Survey, a nationally representative cross-sectional survey. The sample comprised respondents (aged≥18 years) who answered items about SFH rules and socioeconomic disadvantage, defined as past-month unemployment, income below the federal poverty line, and/or education less than a high school diploma (<em>N</em> = 867,552). Multivariable logistic regressions estimated associations between adoption of an SFH rule and the number of socioeconomic disadvantages, including interaction terms between time and disadvantages, to assess changes in disparities over time.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>SFH prevalence increased substantially from 64.6 % in 2001–2002 to 89.0 % in 2018–2019. Differences in SFH prevalence by socioeconomic disadvantage narrowed somewhat over the 19 years among non-smokers but widened among smokers. Among non-smokers, SFH prevalence increased by 17.2 ppt (76.5 % to 93.7 %) for those without disadvantages, while it increased by 24.3 ppt (61.8 % to 86.1 %) among those with three disadvantages. In contrast, among smokers, increases in SFH prevalence over time were smaller among those with one (22.8 % to 51.5 %), two (19.5 % to 45.1 %), and three disadvantages (17.3 % to 37.1 %), compared with those without disadvantages (27.7 % to 61.4 %). The widened disparities were found even among smokers living with children.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Despite a large increase in the SFH prevalence, disparities remain. Our findings underscore the need for continued efforts to promote SFH, particularly among socioeconomically disadvantaged smokers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20339,"journal":{"name":"Preventive medicine","volume":"189 ","pages":"Article 108173"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091743524003281","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To examine disparities in trends of smoke-free home (SFH) rule prevalence in the United States from 2001 to 2019 by individuals' number of socioeconomic disadvantages.
Methods
Data were drawn from the 2001–2019 Tobacco Use Supplements to the U.S. Current Population Survey, a nationally representative cross-sectional survey. The sample comprised respondents (aged≥18 years) who answered items about SFH rules and socioeconomic disadvantage, defined as past-month unemployment, income below the federal poverty line, and/or education less than a high school diploma (N = 867,552). Multivariable logistic regressions estimated associations between adoption of an SFH rule and the number of socioeconomic disadvantages, including interaction terms between time and disadvantages, to assess changes in disparities over time.
Results
SFH prevalence increased substantially from 64.6 % in 2001–2002 to 89.0 % in 2018–2019. Differences in SFH prevalence by socioeconomic disadvantage narrowed somewhat over the 19 years among non-smokers but widened among smokers. Among non-smokers, SFH prevalence increased by 17.2 ppt (76.5 % to 93.7 %) for those without disadvantages, while it increased by 24.3 ppt (61.8 % to 86.1 %) among those with three disadvantages. In contrast, among smokers, increases in SFH prevalence over time were smaller among those with one (22.8 % to 51.5 %), two (19.5 % to 45.1 %), and three disadvantages (17.3 % to 37.1 %), compared with those without disadvantages (27.7 % to 61.4 %). The widened disparities were found even among smokers living with children.
Conclusion
Despite a large increase in the SFH prevalence, disparities remain. Our findings underscore the need for continued efforts to promote SFH, particularly among socioeconomically disadvantaged smokers.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1972 by Ernst Wynder, Preventive Medicine is an international scholarly journal that provides prompt publication of original articles on the science and practice of disease prevention, health promotion, and public health policymaking. Preventive Medicine aims to reward innovation. It will favor insightful observational studies, thoughtful explorations of health data, unsuspected new angles for existing hypotheses, robust randomized controlled trials, and impartial systematic reviews. Preventive Medicine''s ultimate goal is to publish research that will have an impact on the work of practitioners of disease prevention and health promotion, as well as of related disciplines.