Enhanced Recovery Protocol Decreases Postoperative Opioid Use after Penile Inversion Vaginoplasty.

IF 1.5 Q3 SURGERY Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open Pub Date : 2024-11-08 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000006279
Maria V Rios Sanchez, Nicole Sanchez Figueroa, Eugene Zheng, Dan Sotelo Leon, Jorys Martinez-Jorge, Vahe Fahradyan
{"title":"Enhanced Recovery Protocol Decreases Postoperative Opioid Use after Penile Inversion Vaginoplasty.","authors":"Maria V Rios Sanchez, Nicole Sanchez Figueroa, Eugene Zheng, Dan Sotelo Leon, Jorys Martinez-Jorge, Vahe Fahradyan","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Penile inversion vaginoplasty (PIV) entails considerable soft-tissue dissection to the perineal region and involves complex tissue rearrangement. This study examines the role of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway after PIV in reducing opioid use and controlling postoperative pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study of 50 transfemale patients who underwent PIV at a single institution from June 2021 to January 2023 was completed. The study compared 2 groups of patients who were given different postoperative pain management regimens: group A received standard postoperative analgesics and group B received ERAS. Variables such as postoperative pain scores on the numeric pain rating scale (0-10), use of opioid medication, length of hospital stay, and patient comorbidities were recorded and compared across the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average hospital stay length was 4.92 (±0.85) days. Group A had a slightly longer average stay compared with group B. The average pain level in both groups was 4.25 (SD ±1.51). Group A exhibited a slightly higher average pain level of 4.31 (±1.53), whereas group B exhibited 4.16 (SD±1.51) (<i>P</i> = 0.77). Although pain levels did not significantly vary between the 2 groups, there was a statistically significant decrease in the amount of opioid medication used in group B with a <i>P</i> value of 0.009.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ERAS protocol is effective in decreasing opioid usage in the immediate postoperative setting after PIV.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"12 11","pages":"e6279"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11548899/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Penile inversion vaginoplasty (PIV) entails considerable soft-tissue dissection to the perineal region and involves complex tissue rearrangement. This study examines the role of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway after PIV in reducing opioid use and controlling postoperative pain.

Methods: A retrospective study of 50 transfemale patients who underwent PIV at a single institution from June 2021 to January 2023 was completed. The study compared 2 groups of patients who were given different postoperative pain management regimens: group A received standard postoperative analgesics and group B received ERAS. Variables such as postoperative pain scores on the numeric pain rating scale (0-10), use of opioid medication, length of hospital stay, and patient comorbidities were recorded and compared across the 2 groups.

Results: The average hospital stay length was 4.92 (±0.85) days. Group A had a slightly longer average stay compared with group B. The average pain level in both groups was 4.25 (SD ±1.51). Group A exhibited a slightly higher average pain level of 4.31 (±1.53), whereas group B exhibited 4.16 (SD±1.51) (P = 0.77). Although pain levels did not significantly vary between the 2 groups, there was a statistically significant decrease in the amount of opioid medication used in group B with a P value of 0.009.

Conclusions: ERAS protocol is effective in decreasing opioid usage in the immediate postoperative setting after PIV.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
增强恢复方案可减少阴茎内翻阴道成形术后阿片类药物的使用。
背景:阴茎内翻阴道成形术(PIV)需要对会阴区域进行大量的软组织剥离,并涉及复杂的组织重排。本研究探讨了 PIV 术后加强术后恢复(ERAS)途径在减少阿片类药物使用和控制术后疼痛方面的作用:方法:本研究对 2021 年 6 月至 2023 年 1 月期间在一家医疗机构接受 PIV 手术的 50 名输血女性患者进行了回顾性研究。研究比较了两组接受不同术后疼痛治疗方案的患者:A 组接受标准术后镇痛药,B 组接受 ERAS。研究记录并比较了两组患者的术后疼痛评分(0-10 分)、阿片类药物的使用、住院时间和患者的合并症等变量:平均住院时间为 4.92 天(±0.85)。两组患者的平均疼痛程度均为 4.25(标准差 ±1.51)。A 组的平均疼痛程度略高,为 4.31(±1.53),而 B 组为 4.16(SD±1.51)(P = 0.77)。虽然两组患者的疼痛程度没有明显差异,但 B 组患者的阿片类药物用量明显减少,P 值为 0.009:ERAS方案能有效减少PIV术后阿片类药物的用量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
1584
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.
期刊最新文献
Clinically Applied Biomechanics of Mesh-reinforced Ventral Hernia Repair: A Practical Review. New Findings in Prominent Lower Eyelid Fat Pads Possibly Contributing to Their Etiology: Two Prospective Studies. Percutaneous Needle Fasciotomy Versus Limited Fasciectomy for Dupuytren Disease: A Linear Model Assessment of Short-term Efficacy. Rapid-printed Three-dimensional Models for Craniomaxillofacial Trauma. Surgery With Peripheral Nerve Block Under Dexmedetomidine Sedation for Foot Ulcer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1