The Impact of Complication Timing on the Outcomes of Implant-based Breast Reconstruction.

IF 1.5 Q3 SURGERY Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open Pub Date : 2024-11-11 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000006293
Tahera Alnaseri, Shamit Prabhu, Lexy Anderson, Lorna Kwan, Maral Demirjian, Alvin Kwok, Christopher Reid, Scott Hollenbeck, Michael R DeLong
{"title":"The Impact of Complication Timing on the Outcomes of Implant-based Breast Reconstruction.","authors":"Tahera Alnaseri, Shamit Prabhu, Lexy Anderson, Lorna Kwan, Maral Demirjian, Alvin Kwok, Christopher Reid, Scott Hollenbeck, Michael R DeLong","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database provides an important resource for determining complication rates and risk factors for surgical procedures. However, NSQIP is limited to 30-day follow-up, and it is unclear whether this is reliable for evaluating prosthetic breast reconstruction outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-institution, cross-sectional, retrospective review was performed for patients undergoing mastectomy with immediate, prepectoral tissue expander reconstruction. Timing of complications was stratified as early (within 30 days of operation) versus late (after 30 days). Categorical variables were compared using χ<sup>2</sup> (or Fisher exact) tests, and continuous variables were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis or Wilcoxon rank-sum tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 301 patients (509 reconstructed breasts) included with a median follow-up time of 11 months. Of them, 176 patients (58%) experienced a postoperative complication-140 patients (47%) experienced an early complication and 36 patients (12%) experienced a late complication. Patients with late complications had a significantly higher rate of reconstructive failure compared with the early complication group (17% versus 10%; <i>P</i> = 0.001) and were more likely to require a flap (28% versus 7%; <i>P</i> = 0.001) for final reconstruction. Revision surgery rates after final implant placement were higher in the late complication group (36% versus 64%; <i>P</i> = 0.285).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Late complications after prepectoral breast reconstruction have a more prominent impact on reconstructive failure and revisions than early complications. This finding may inform strategies to revise national databases such as NSQIP to include more detailed information and longer capture periods.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"12 11","pages":"e6293"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11554351/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database provides an important resource for determining complication rates and risk factors for surgical procedures. However, NSQIP is limited to 30-day follow-up, and it is unclear whether this is reliable for evaluating prosthetic breast reconstruction outcomes.

Methods: A single-institution, cross-sectional, retrospective review was performed for patients undergoing mastectomy with immediate, prepectoral tissue expander reconstruction. Timing of complications was stratified as early (within 30 days of operation) versus late (after 30 days). Categorical variables were compared using χ2 (or Fisher exact) tests, and continuous variables were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis or Wilcoxon rank-sum tests.

Results: There were 301 patients (509 reconstructed breasts) included with a median follow-up time of 11 months. Of them, 176 patients (58%) experienced a postoperative complication-140 patients (47%) experienced an early complication and 36 patients (12%) experienced a late complication. Patients with late complications had a significantly higher rate of reconstructive failure compared with the early complication group (17% versus 10%; P = 0.001) and were more likely to require a flap (28% versus 7%; P = 0.001) for final reconstruction. Revision surgery rates after final implant placement were higher in the late complication group (36% versus 64%; P = 0.285).

Conclusions: Late complications after prepectoral breast reconstruction have a more prominent impact on reconstructive failure and revisions than early complications. This finding may inform strategies to revise national databases such as NSQIP to include more detailed information and longer capture periods.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
并发症发生时间对植入式乳房再造术结果的影响。
背景:国家外科质量改进计划(NSQIP)数据库为确定外科手术的并发症发生率和风险因素提供了重要资源。然而,NSQIP仅限于30天的随访,目前还不清楚这对评估假体乳房重建结果是否可靠:方法:对接受乳房切除术并立即进行胸大肌前组织扩张器重建的患者进行了单机构、横断面、回顾性审查。并发症发生的时间分为早期(手术后 30 天内)和晚期(30 天后)。分类变量采用χ2(或费雪精确)检验进行比较,连续变量采用Kruskal-Wallis或Wilcoxon秩和检验进行分析:共纳入 301 例患者(509 例重建乳房),中位随访时间为 11 个月。其中,176 名患者(58%)出现了术后并发症--140 名患者(47%)出现了早期并发症,36 名患者(12%)出现了晚期并发症。与早期并发症组相比,晚期并发症患者的重建失败率明显更高(17% 对 10%;P = 0.001),而且更有可能需要使用皮瓣(28% 对 7%;P = 0.001)进行最终重建。晚期并发症组最终植入假体后的翻修手术率更高(36%对64%;P = 0.285):结论:与早期并发症相比,胸大肌前乳房再造术后的晚期并发症对再造失败和再造手术的影响更为显著。这一发现可为修订国家数据库(如 NSQIP),纳入更详细的信息和更长的采集期提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
1584
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.
期刊最新文献
A Regional Analysis of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Initiatives in Plastic Surgery Residency Programs. Critical Assessment of Fellowship Director Gender and Ethnic Diversity across the Five Major Plastic Surgery Fellowships. Diversity in the US Academic Microsurgery Pathway. Dr. Sylvester J. Carter: First Black American Hand Surgeon and Early Pioneer in Hand Surgery. Real-world Use of AlloDerm Acellular Dermal Matrix in Head and Neck Procedures in the United States.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1