Prostatic stents: a systematic review and analysis of functional outcomes and complication rate.

Abstract

Background: This review aims to identify and summarize the current literature on the use of prostatic stents or nitinol devices as minimally invasive techniques for the management of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) resulting from benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

Methods: A comprehensive search of the literature was conducted until October 2023. Only original articles written in English were considered for inclusion. This review has been registered in PROSPERO (registration number CRD42023474884).

Results: Thirty-eight articles were included (2618 patients). Generally, the risk of bias was deemed as high or very high. The most frequently investigated stents were the UroLume, followed by the Memokath/Memotherm. The mean age was 72.01 ± 5.6 years, with a mean prostate volume of 48.27 ± 12.8 cc and a mean urethral length of 40.53 ± 9.16 mm. Surgeries were usually performed under local anesthesia. The rates of catheter-free status and complications were 85.2% and 30.83%, respectively. The primary complications included urinary tract infections (17.2%), followed by calcifications (12.6%), irritative symptoms (12.2%), and acute urinary retention (10.4%). During a follow-up period of 12 months, the failure rate intended as stent removal or repositioning was 14.8%. The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) showed an overall improvement of 9.85 points. The mean improvement in maximum flow rate and post-void residual volume were 6.62 ml/sec and 147 ml, respectively.

Conclusions: Prostatic stents remain an efficient choice for addressing obstructive symptoms from BPH, offering the advantage of being performed under local anaesthesia, relieving symptoms with good functional outcomes and a low incidence of major complications. Prospective studies are needed to corroborate these results.