[Clinical diagnostic study of Ramp lesion of medial meniscus based on knee MRI at 90° flexed position].

Yuan Yao, Shujun Liu, Xianxiang Xiang, Zhiheng Wei, Weiming Wang, Jue Gong
{"title":"[Clinical diagnostic study of Ramp lesion of medial meniscus based on knee MRI at 90° flexed position].","authors":"Yuan Yao, Shujun Liu, Xianxiang Xiang, Zhiheng Wei, Weiming Wang, Jue Gong","doi":"10.7507/1002-1892.202406059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the clinical diagnostic value of knee MRI at 90° flexed position for Ramp lesions of medial meniscus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 228 patients with knee pain as the main complaint who were admitted between September 2021 and September 2023 was selected as the research subjects, of which 51 patients met the selection criteria and were enrolled in the study. There were 31 males and 20 females with an average age of 38.6 years (range, 15-67 years). Body mass index was 17.2-28.7 kg/m <sup>2</sup> (mean, 23.9 kg/m <sup>2</sup>). There were 25 cases of left knee and 36 cases of right knee. The time from injury to admission was 0.1-14.3 weeks (mean, 2.1 weeks). Preoperative knee MRI at fully extended position (knee extension position) and 90° flexed position (knee flexion position) were performed to determine the presence of irregular signs at the posterior edge of the medial meniscus, and PHMM fluid high signal [i.e. complete fluid filling between the posterior horn of the medial meniscus (PHMM) and the capsule margin]. Findings obtained under arthroscopy served as the \"gold standard\" to analyze the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of MRI at knee extension and flexion positions for the two specific signs of Ramp lesion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one patients (41.2%) were diagnosed with Ramp lesions by using arthroscopy, including 1 case of Thaunat type Ⅰ, 2 cases of type Ⅱ, 6 cases of type Ⅲ, 7 cases of type Ⅳ, and 5 cases of type Ⅴ. The positive rates of irregular signs at the posterior edge of the medial meniscus on MRI at knee extension and flexion positions were significantly different from the diagnosis of Ramp injury under arthroscopy ( <i>P</i><0.05). The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV of MRI in the diagnosis of irregular signs were 76.1%, 60.0%, 66.7%, 57.1%, and 78.3% respectively at knee extension position, and 85.7%, 73.3%, 78.4%, 69.2%, and 88.0% respectively at knee flexion position. The positive rates of PHMM fluid high signal on MRI at knee extension and flexion positions were significantly different from the diagnosis of Ramp injury under arthroscopy ( <i>P</i><0.05). The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV of MRI in diagnosing PHMM fluid high signal were 38.1%, 100%, 74.5%, 100%, and 69.8% respectively at knee extension position, and 85.7%, 100%, 94.1%, 100%, and 90.9% respectively at knee flexion position.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Knee MRI at 90° flexed position improves the diagnostic performance of the detection of medial meniscal Ramp lesions compared with MRI at fully extended position.</p>","PeriodicalId":23979,"journal":{"name":"中国修复重建外科杂志","volume":"38 11","pages":"1346-1351"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11563743/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国修复重建外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7507/1002-1892.202406059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the clinical diagnostic value of knee MRI at 90° flexed position for Ramp lesions of medial meniscus.

Methods: A total of 228 patients with knee pain as the main complaint who were admitted between September 2021 and September 2023 was selected as the research subjects, of which 51 patients met the selection criteria and were enrolled in the study. There were 31 males and 20 females with an average age of 38.6 years (range, 15-67 years). Body mass index was 17.2-28.7 kg/m 2 (mean, 23.9 kg/m 2). There were 25 cases of left knee and 36 cases of right knee. The time from injury to admission was 0.1-14.3 weeks (mean, 2.1 weeks). Preoperative knee MRI at fully extended position (knee extension position) and 90° flexed position (knee flexion position) were performed to determine the presence of irregular signs at the posterior edge of the medial meniscus, and PHMM fluid high signal [i.e. complete fluid filling between the posterior horn of the medial meniscus (PHMM) and the capsule margin]. Findings obtained under arthroscopy served as the "gold standard" to analyze the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of MRI at knee extension and flexion positions for the two specific signs of Ramp lesion.

Results: Twenty-one patients (41.2%) were diagnosed with Ramp lesions by using arthroscopy, including 1 case of Thaunat type Ⅰ, 2 cases of type Ⅱ, 6 cases of type Ⅲ, 7 cases of type Ⅳ, and 5 cases of type Ⅴ. The positive rates of irregular signs at the posterior edge of the medial meniscus on MRI at knee extension and flexion positions were significantly different from the diagnosis of Ramp injury under arthroscopy ( P<0.05). The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV of MRI in the diagnosis of irregular signs were 76.1%, 60.0%, 66.7%, 57.1%, and 78.3% respectively at knee extension position, and 85.7%, 73.3%, 78.4%, 69.2%, and 88.0% respectively at knee flexion position. The positive rates of PHMM fluid high signal on MRI at knee extension and flexion positions were significantly different from the diagnosis of Ramp injury under arthroscopy ( P<0.05). The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV of MRI in diagnosing PHMM fluid high signal were 38.1%, 100%, 74.5%, 100%, and 69.8% respectively at knee extension position, and 85.7%, 100%, 94.1%, 100%, and 90.9% respectively at knee flexion position.

Conclusion: Knee MRI at 90° flexed position improves the diagnostic performance of the detection of medial meniscal Ramp lesions compared with MRI at fully extended position.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[基于膝关节 90°屈曲位核磁共振成像的内侧半月板斜坡病变临床诊断研究]。
目的:评估膝关节 90°屈曲位核磁共振成像对内侧半月板损伤的临床诊断价值:评估膝关节90°屈曲位核磁共振成像对内侧半月板Ramp病变的临床诊断价值:选取 2021 年 9 月至 2023 年 9 月期间收治的以膝关节疼痛为主诉的 228 例患者作为研究对象,其中 51 例患者符合入选标准并纳入研究。其中男性 31 人,女性 20 人,平均年龄 38.6 岁(15-67 岁)。体重指数为 17.2-28.7 kg/m2(平均为 23.9 kg/m2)。其中左膝 25 例,右膝 36 例。从受伤到入院的时间为0.1-14.3周(平均2.1周)。术前分别在完全伸直位(膝关节伸直位)和屈曲90°位(膝关节屈曲位)进行膝关节核磁共振成像检查,以确定内侧半月板后缘是否存在不规则征象,以及PHMM液体高信号[即内侧半月板后角(PHMM)和关节囊边缘之间完全充满液体]。以关节镜检查结果为 "金标准",分析膝关节伸直位和屈曲位核磁共振成像对 Ramp 病变两种特殊征象的敏感性、特异性、准确性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV):21例(41.2%)患者通过关节镜检查确诊为Ramp病变,其中Thaunat Ⅰ型1例,Ⅱ型2例,Ⅲ型6例,Ⅳ型7例,Ⅴ型5例。膝关节伸直位和屈曲位核磁共振成像显示内侧半月板后缘不规则征象的阳性率与关节镜下的 Ramp 损伤诊断有显著差异(PPConclusion):与完全伸直位的核磁共振成像相比,90°屈曲位的膝关节核磁共振成像可提高内侧半月板Ramp损伤的诊断率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
中国修复重建外科杂志
中国修复重建外科杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11334
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
[Anatomical research of positional relationship between protective channel and sural nerve during Achilles tendon repair using channel assisted minimally invasive repair technique]. [Application and progress of bio-derived materials in bladder regeneration and repair]. [Clinical diagnostic study of Ramp lesion of medial meniscus based on knee MRI at 90° flexed position]. [Clinical study of percutaneous endoscopic thoracic spine surgery via trench technique for thoracic spinal cord ventral decompression]. [Early effectiveness of unilateral biportal endoscopy technique for migrated lumbar intervertebral disc herniation].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1