[Impact of robot assistance on restoration of limb length and offset distance in total hip arthroplasty].

Ziqi Yuan, Yang Li, Hua Tian
{"title":"[Impact of robot assistance on restoration of limb length and offset distance in total hip arthroplasty].","authors":"Ziqi Yuan, Yang Li, Hua Tian","doi":"10.7507/1002-1892.202405034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the impact of robot assistance on the restoration of limb length and offset distance in total hip arthroplasty (THA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 316 patients who underwent unilateral primary THA between September 2019 and August 2023. Among them, 117 patients underwent robot-assisted THA (group A), and 199 patients underwent conventional THA (group B). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the gender, age, or side of the hip replacement ( <i>P</i>>0.05); but there was a significant difference in the preoperative diagnosis ( <i>P</i><0.05). The leg length discrepancy (LLD) and global offset (GO) dfference were measured on preoperative anteroposterior pelvic X-ray films, and absolute values were used for comparison between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The operations in both groups were successfully completed. Postoperative imaging measurements showed that the LLD and GO dfference in group A were significantly lower than those in group B ( <i>P</i><0.05). Among them, group A had 32 cases (27.4%), 5 cases (4.3%), and 0 case (0) of LLD>3 mm, >5 mm, and >10 mm, respectively, while group B had 115 cases (57.8%), 75 cases (37.7%), and 22 cases (11.1%), respectively; and the differences in above indicators between groups were significant ( <i>P</i><0.05). Group A had 40 cases (34.2%), 3 cases (2.6%), and 0 case (0) of GO dfference>5 mm, >10 mm, and >20 mm, respectively; group B had 103 cases (51.8%), 54 cases (27.1%), and 7 cases (3.5%), respectively. There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients with GO>20 mm between groups ( <i>P</i>>0.05), while there were significant differences in other indicators between groups ( <i>P</i><0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with traditional THA, robot assisted THA has more advantages in restoration of limb length and offset distance.</p>","PeriodicalId":23979,"journal":{"name":"中国修复重建外科杂志","volume":"38 11","pages":"1307-1311"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11563739/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国修复重建外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7507/1002-1892.202405034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the impact of robot assistance on the restoration of limb length and offset distance in total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 316 patients who underwent unilateral primary THA between September 2019 and August 2023. Among them, 117 patients underwent robot-assisted THA (group A), and 199 patients underwent conventional THA (group B). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the gender, age, or side of the hip replacement ( P>0.05); but there was a significant difference in the preoperative diagnosis ( P<0.05). The leg length discrepancy (LLD) and global offset (GO) dfference were measured on preoperative anteroposterior pelvic X-ray films, and absolute values were used for comparison between groups.

Results: The operations in both groups were successfully completed. Postoperative imaging measurements showed that the LLD and GO dfference in group A were significantly lower than those in group B ( P<0.05). Among them, group A had 32 cases (27.4%), 5 cases (4.3%), and 0 case (0) of LLD>3 mm, >5 mm, and >10 mm, respectively, while group B had 115 cases (57.8%), 75 cases (37.7%), and 22 cases (11.1%), respectively; and the differences in above indicators between groups were significant ( P<0.05). Group A had 40 cases (34.2%), 3 cases (2.6%), and 0 case (0) of GO dfference>5 mm, >10 mm, and >20 mm, respectively; group B had 103 cases (51.8%), 54 cases (27.1%), and 7 cases (3.5%), respectively. There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients with GO>20 mm between groups ( P>0.05), while there were significant differences in other indicators between groups ( P<0.05).

Conclusion: Compared with traditional THA, robot assisted THA has more advantages in restoration of limb length and offset distance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[机器人辅助对全髋关节置换术中恢复肢体长度和偏移距离的影响]。
目的分析机器人辅助对全髋关节置换术(THA)中肢体长度和偏移距离恢复的影响:对2019年9月至2023年8月期间接受单侧初次全髋关节置换术的316例患者的临床数据进行回顾性分析。其中,117 名患者接受了机器人辅助 THA(A 组),199 名患者接受了传统 THA(B 组)。两组患者在性别、年龄、髋关节置换侧等方面无明显差异(P>0.05);但在术前诊断(PResults:两组手术均顺利完成。术后影像学测量结果显示,A组的LLD和GO差值明显低于B组(分别为P3 mm、>5 mm和>10 mm,B组分别为115例(57.8%)、75例(37.7%)和22例(11.1%);组间上述指标差异显著(分别为P5 mm、>10 mm和>20 mm,B组分别为103例(51.8%)、54例(27.1%)和7例(3.5%)。GO>20毫米的患者比例组间差异无学意义(P>0.05),而其他指标组间差异有学意义(P结论:与传统THA相比,机器人辅助THA在恢复肢体长度和偏移距离方面更具优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
中国修复重建外科杂志
中国修复重建外科杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11334
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
[Anatomical research of positional relationship between protective channel and sural nerve during Achilles tendon repair using channel assisted minimally invasive repair technique]. [Application and progress of bio-derived materials in bladder regeneration and repair]. [Clinical diagnostic study of Ramp lesion of medial meniscus based on knee MRI at 90° flexed position]. [Clinical study of percutaneous endoscopic thoracic spine surgery via trench technique for thoracic spinal cord ventral decompression]. [Early effectiveness of unilateral biportal endoscopy technique for migrated lumbar intervertebral disc herniation].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1