[The development of regulation of pharmaceuticals turn-over in EU and the USA in 1992-2020. Report 3. The making of the EU legislation of pharmaceuticals turn-over in 2001-2020].

E A Volskaya
{"title":"[The development of regulation of pharmaceuticals turn-over in EU and the USA in 1992-2020. Report 3. The making of the EU legislation of pharmaceuticals turn-over in 2001-2020].","authors":"E A Volskaya","doi":"10.32687/0869-866X-2024-32-5-933-940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article proceeds the topic of the article \"The development of regulation of the circulation of medicines in the EU and the USA in 1992-2020.\" The history of development of European pharmaceutical legislation in 2001-2020 is considered. The acts of indirect action adopted by EU Parliament at first stage of development of legislation concerning medications failed to fully harmonize normative base of the EU Member States in pharmaceutical market. Since 2000, the EU Parliament and the EU Council adopt laws of direct action - the Regulations. Alongside with the pharmaceutical Code, the Regulations for single segments of pharmaceutical market constituted set of laws related to turn-over of medications. The legislators, at developing EU laws, took into account the US regulatory standards. Despite differences in history, legislative traditions and structure, regulatory systems of the USA and the EU concerning medications turn-over were basically harmonized.</p>","PeriodicalId":35946,"journal":{"name":"Problemy sotsial''noi gigieny i istoriia meditsiny / NII sotsial''noi gigieny, ekonomiki i upravleniia zdravookhraneniem im. N.A. Semashko RAMN, AO ''Assotsiatsiia ''Meditsinskaia literatura''","volume":"32 5","pages":"933-940"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problemy sotsial''noi gigieny i istoriia meditsiny / NII sotsial''noi gigieny, ekonomiki i upravleniia zdravookhraneniem im. N.A. Semashko RAMN, AO ''Assotsiatsiia ''Meditsinskaia literatura''","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32687/0869-866X-2024-32-5-933-940","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article proceeds the topic of the article "The development of regulation of the circulation of medicines in the EU and the USA in 1992-2020." The history of development of European pharmaceutical legislation in 2001-2020 is considered. The acts of indirect action adopted by EU Parliament at first stage of development of legislation concerning medications failed to fully harmonize normative base of the EU Member States in pharmaceutical market. Since 2000, the EU Parliament and the EU Council adopt laws of direct action - the Regulations. Alongside with the pharmaceutical Code, the Regulations for single segments of pharmaceutical market constituted set of laws related to turn-over of medications. The legislators, at developing EU laws, took into account the US regulatory standards. Despite differences in history, legislative traditions and structure, regulatory systems of the USA and the EU concerning medications turn-over were basically harmonized.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[1992-2020 年欧盟和美国药品交易监管的发展。报告 3.2001-2020 年欧盟药品交易立法的制定]。
本文继续 "1992-2020 年欧盟和美国药品流通监管的发展 "一文的主题。文章探讨了 2001-2020 年欧洲药品立法的发展历程。在药品立法发展的第一阶段,欧盟议会通过的间接行动法案未能完全协调欧盟成员国在药品市场的规范基础。自 2000 年起,欧盟议会和欧盟理事会通过了直接行动法--条例。除《药品法典》外,针对药品市场单一领域的《条例》也构成了一套与药品流通相关的法律。立法者在制定欧盟法律时考虑了美国的监管标准。尽管在历史、立法传统和结构方面存在差异,但美国和欧盟在药品周转方面的监管制度基本保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
234
期刊最新文献
[The comparative analysis of correspondence of normative and factual number of stomatologists considering private medical organizations]. [G. A. Miterev, the director of the Erisman Central Research Sanitary Institute]. [On the issue of determining notions "medical malpractice", "yatrogeny" and "defect of medical care": social legal aspects]. [The analysis of medical demographic indicators of rural population]. [The attraction of medical workers to civil and administrative responsibility].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1