[The evaluation of efficiency of new methodology of personified registration and distribution of workload of pathoanatomists].

G M Gaydarov, A E Makarova
{"title":"[The evaluation of efficiency of new methodology of personified registration and distribution of workload of pathoanatomists].","authors":"G M Gaydarov, A E Makarova","doi":"10.32687/0869-866X-2024-32-5-912-917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The original methodology developed by authors for personalized registration and distribution of workload of pathologists is implemented into a number of departments of pathological-anatomic service of the Irkutsk Oblast, including pathological-anatomic department of the Oblast State Budget Institution \"The Irkutsk Municipal Clinical Hospital № 1\". In order to evaluate efficiency of new methodology comparative analysis of workload volumes performed by pathologists with calculated standard workload was carried out for two periods i.e before application of new methodology and after its implementation. It is established that in 2017-2019 before implementation of new methodology, discrepancy between workload performed by physicians and its calculated value exceeded 40% in some specialists. The implementation of new methodology resulted in significant, up to 10-fold, decreasing of discrepancy between workload practically performed by physicians and its standard value. As a result, actually this discrepancy on average does not exceed 4% in most specialists. The application of the Student's t-test to compare value of discrepancy between workload performed by pathologists for two compared periods also permitted to establish statistical significance of given differences related to majority of physicians (p<0.05) that serves as justification of efficiency and reasonability of new methodology.</p>","PeriodicalId":35946,"journal":{"name":"Problemy sotsial''noi gigieny i istoriia meditsiny / NII sotsial''noi gigieny, ekonomiki i upravleniia zdravookhraneniem im. N.A. Semashko RAMN, AO ''Assotsiatsiia ''Meditsinskaia literatura''","volume":"32 5","pages":"912-917"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problemy sotsial''noi gigieny i istoriia meditsiny / NII sotsial''noi gigieny, ekonomiki i upravleniia zdravookhraneniem im. N.A. Semashko RAMN, AO ''Assotsiatsiia ''Meditsinskaia literatura''","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32687/0869-866X-2024-32-5-912-917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The original methodology developed by authors for personalized registration and distribution of workload of pathologists is implemented into a number of departments of pathological-anatomic service of the Irkutsk Oblast, including pathological-anatomic department of the Oblast State Budget Institution "The Irkutsk Municipal Clinical Hospital № 1". In order to evaluate efficiency of new methodology comparative analysis of workload volumes performed by pathologists with calculated standard workload was carried out for two periods i.e before application of new methodology and after its implementation. It is established that in 2017-2019 before implementation of new methodology, discrepancy between workload performed by physicians and its calculated value exceeded 40% in some specialists. The implementation of new methodology resulted in significant, up to 10-fold, decreasing of discrepancy between workload practically performed by physicians and its standard value. As a result, actually this discrepancy on average does not exceed 4% in most specialists. The application of the Student's t-test to compare value of discrepancy between workload performed by pathologists for two compared periods also permitted to establish statistical significance of given differences related to majority of physicians (p<0.05) that serves as justification of efficiency and reasonability of new methodology.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[病理解剖学家个性化注册和工作量分配新方法的效率评估]。
在伊尔库茨克州的病理解剖学服务部门,包括州国家预算机构 "伊尔库茨克市第一临床医院 "的病理解剖学部门,实施了作者开发的病理学家工作量个性化登记和分配的原始方法。为了评估新方法的效率,对病理学家的工作量与计算出的标准工作量进行了两个时期的比较分析,即新方法应用前和实施后。结果表明,在新方法实施前的 2017-2019 年,医生完成的工作量与计算值之间的差异在某些专家身上超过了 40%。实施新方法后,医生实际完成的工作量与其标准值之间的差异显著减少,最多减少了 10 倍。因此,大多数专家的平均差异实际上不超过 4%。采用学生 t 检验法比较病理学家在两个比较期间的工作量差异值,也能确定与大多数医生有关的特定差异的统计意义(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
234
期刊最新文献
[The comparative analysis of correspondence of normative and factual number of stomatologists considering private medical organizations]. [G. A. Miterev, the director of the Erisman Central Research Sanitary Institute]. [On the issue of determining notions "medical malpractice", "yatrogeny" and "defect of medical care": social legal aspects]. [The analysis of medical demographic indicators of rural population]. [The attraction of medical workers to civil and administrative responsibility].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1