Briana S Last, Noah S Triplett, Emma E McGinty, Claire R Waller, Gabriela Kattan Khazanov, Rinad S Beidas
{"title":"The social determinants of resilience: A conceptual framework to integrate psychological and policy research.","authors":"Briana S Last, Noah S Triplett, Emma E McGinty, Claire R Waller, Gabriela Kattan Khazanov, Rinad S Beidas","doi":"10.1037/amp0001308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The psychological study of resilience has increasingly underscored the need for children and families to access material and psychological resources to positively adapt to significant stress. Redistributive policies-policies that downwardly reallocate society's social and economic resources-can offer economically disadvantaged families sustained access to these resources and mitigate the harmful impacts of adversity. This conceptual article builds upon and integrates insights from psychological and policy research to develop a unifying multilevel resilience framework, which we call the Social Determinants of Resilience. We examine four U.S. redistributive policies that have been extensively studied for their effects on child and family outcomes as case studies: (1) Medicaid expansion; (2) the Earned Income Tax Credit; (3) childcare subsidies; and (4) Temporary Assistance for Needy Families. Informed by a scoping review of each policy, we propose that redistributive policies promote children's resilience through three mechanisms by (1) increasing families' resource and service access; (2) reducing family stress; and (3) enhancing adaptive cognitions, emotions, behaviors, and interpersonal processes that protect against the development of psychopathology and promote positive mental health outcomes. Highlighting current evidence for these resilience mechanisms as well as gaps in knowledge, we conclude by setting a multidisciplinary research agenda that can leverage this conceptual framework to advance the science on how redistributive policies enable children and families to thrive. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48468,"journal":{"name":"American Psychologist","volume":"79 8","pages":"1049-1062"},"PeriodicalIF":12.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Psychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001308","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The psychological study of resilience has increasingly underscored the need for children and families to access material and psychological resources to positively adapt to significant stress. Redistributive policies-policies that downwardly reallocate society's social and economic resources-can offer economically disadvantaged families sustained access to these resources and mitigate the harmful impacts of adversity. This conceptual article builds upon and integrates insights from psychological and policy research to develop a unifying multilevel resilience framework, which we call the Social Determinants of Resilience. We examine four U.S. redistributive policies that have been extensively studied for their effects on child and family outcomes as case studies: (1) Medicaid expansion; (2) the Earned Income Tax Credit; (3) childcare subsidies; and (4) Temporary Assistance for Needy Families. Informed by a scoping review of each policy, we propose that redistributive policies promote children's resilience through three mechanisms by (1) increasing families' resource and service access; (2) reducing family stress; and (3) enhancing adaptive cognitions, emotions, behaviors, and interpersonal processes that protect against the development of psychopathology and promote positive mental health outcomes. Highlighting current evidence for these resilience mechanisms as well as gaps in knowledge, we conclude by setting a multidisciplinary research agenda that can leverage this conceptual framework to advance the science on how redistributive policies enable children and families to thrive. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
对复原力的心理学研究日益强调,儿童和家庭需要获得物质和心理资源,以积极适应重大压力。再分配政策--向下重新分配社会和经济资源的政策--可以让经济上处于不利地位的家庭持续获得这些资源,并减轻逆境的有害影响。这篇概念性文章基于并整合了心理学和政策研究的见解,建立了一个统一的多层次复原力框架,我们称之为 "复原力的社会决定因素"。作为案例研究,我们考察了四项美国再分配政策,这些政策对儿童和家庭结果的影响已得到广泛研究:(1) 扩大医疗补助;(2) 收入所得税抵免;(3) 儿童保育补贴;(4) 贫困家庭临时援助。根据对每项政策的范围审查,我们建议再分配政策通过以下三种机制促进儿童的复原力:(1)增加家庭获得资源和服务的机会;(2)减少家庭压力;(3)增强适应性认知、情感、行为和人际交往过程,从而防止心理病理学的发展并促进积极的心理健康结果。最后,我们强调了这些复原机制的现有证据以及知识差距,并制定了一个多学科研究议程,该议程可利用这一概念框架来推动有关再分配政策如何使儿童和家庭茁壮成长的科学研究。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)。
期刊介绍:
Established in 1946, American Psychologist® is the flagship peer-reviewed scholarly journal of the American Psychological Association. It publishes high-impact papers of broad interest, including empirical reports, meta-analyses, and scholarly reviews, covering psychological science, practice, education, and policy. Articles often address issues of national and international significance within the field of psychology and its relationship to society. Published in an accessible style, contributions in American Psychologist are designed to be understood by both psychologists and the general public.