Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on medical office assistants (MOAs) Working in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study.

IF 2.5 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE BJGP Open Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0151
Jennifer K Johnson, Bridget L Ryan, Amanda L Terry, Judith Belle Brown
{"title":"Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on medical office assistants (MOAs) Working in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Jennifer K Johnson, Bridget L Ryan, Amanda L Terry, Judith Belle Brown","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical Office Assistants (MOAs), also known as receptionists and clerks, are front line workers and the most accessible member of the primary care team. Historically, their contributions to primary care have been unrecognised and undervalued. The COVID-19 pandemic put pressure on existing roles and systems in primary care: how MOAs adapted is unknown.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the experiences of MOAs working in primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic from the perspectives of MOAs and family physicians (FPs) who worked with MOAs during this period.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>A qualitative study using Constructivist Grounded Theory, conducted in Ontario, Canada METHOD: Seventeen participants were recruited through professional contacts of the research team. Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with MOAs and FPs across the province.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MOAs' many responsibilities in primary care intensified during the pandemic. MOAs leveraged their healthcare system knowledge and therapeutic relationships with patients to reduce patient distress. Unfortunately, MOAs experienced more frustration, and in some cases, abuse from patients. MOAs' ability to adapt to new systems and respond to high patient needs seemed to be positively influenced by their relationships with patients and FPs. FPs expressed concern for MOA welfare and recognised their critical role on primary care teams.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MOAs made significant contributions to primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study suggests MOAs have greater capacity than previously recognised which has important implications for planning in an era of under-resourced healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Medical Office Assistants (MOAs), also known as receptionists and clerks, are front line workers and the most accessible member of the primary care team. Historically, their contributions to primary care have been unrecognised and undervalued. The COVID-19 pandemic put pressure on existing roles and systems in primary care: how MOAs adapted is unknown.

Aim: To explore the experiences of MOAs working in primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic from the perspectives of MOAs and family physicians (FPs) who worked with MOAs during this period.

Design & setting: A qualitative study using Constructivist Grounded Theory, conducted in Ontario, Canada METHOD: Seventeen participants were recruited through professional contacts of the research team. Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with MOAs and FPs across the province.

Results: MOAs' many responsibilities in primary care intensified during the pandemic. MOAs leveraged their healthcare system knowledge and therapeutic relationships with patients to reduce patient distress. Unfortunately, MOAs experienced more frustration, and in some cases, abuse from patients. MOAs' ability to adapt to new systems and respond to high patient needs seemed to be positively influenced by their relationships with patients and FPs. FPs expressed concern for MOA welfare and recognised their critical role on primary care teams.

Conclusion: MOAs made significant contributions to primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study suggests MOAs have greater capacity than previously recognised which has important implications for planning in an era of under-resourced healthcare.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 大流行对在基层医疗机构工作的医务室助理 (MOAs) 的影响:定性研究。
背景:医务室助理 (MOA),又称接待员和文员,是一线工作者,也是基层医疗团队中最容易接触到的成员。从历史上看,他们对初级医疗的贡献一直未得到认可和低估。COVID-19大流行给初级医疗中的现有角色和系统带来了压力:MOA如何适应尚不得而知。目的:从MOA和在此期间与MOA合作的家庭医生(FPs)的角度,探讨COVID-19大流行期间在初级医疗中工作的MOA的经历:方法:通过研究小组的专业联系人招募了 17 名参与者。对全省的教学助理和 FP 进行了个人半结构式访谈:在大流行期间,医疗机构在初级保健方面的许多职责都得到了加强。助教利用其医疗保健系统知识和与患者的治疗关系来减轻患者的痛苦。不幸的是,助教也遇到了更多的挫折,在某些情况下还遭到了患者的辱骂。MOA 适应新系统和满足患者高需求的能力似乎受到了他们与患者和 FP 关系的积极影响。家庭医生对助教的福利表示关注,并认识到他们在基层医疗团队中的关键作用:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,助教对初级保健做出了重大贡献。这项研究表明,流动医疗机构的能力比以往认识到的要大,这对医疗资源不足时代的规划具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
General practice characteristics associated with pay-for-performance in the UK: a systematic review. How do GPs communicate the urgent suspected cancer referral pathway to patients? A qualitative study of GP-patient consultations. Could a behaviour change intervention be used to address under-recognition of work-related asthma in primary care? A systematic review. Editorial: Global health inequity and primary care. Clinical decision making and risk appraisal using electronic risk assessment tools (eRATs) for cancer diagnosis: A qualitative study of GP experiences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1