Uptake of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After High-Risk Transient Ischemic Attack at a University Hospital.

IF 0.9 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurohospitalist Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1177/19418744241289625
Morin Beyeler, Philipp Bücke, Pasquale Castigliego, Joel Baumann, Victor Ziegler, Babak B Navi, Simon Jung, Marcel Arnold, Ava L Liberman
{"title":"Uptake of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After High-Risk Transient Ischemic Attack at a University Hospital.","authors":"Morin Beyeler, Philipp Bücke, Pasquale Castigliego, Joel Baumann, Victor Ziegler, Babak B Navi, Simon Jung, Marcel Arnold, Ava L Liberman","doi":"10.1177/19418744241289625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multiple randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) significantly reduces the risk of subsequent stroke as compared to aspirin monotherapy after high-risk transient ischemic attack (TIA) or minor ischemic stroke. We sought to evaluate the uptake of DAPT after high-risk TIA at a single center. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive TIA patients admitted via the Emergency Department (ED) of Bern University Hospital (1/1/2018-12/31/2019). We use descriptive statistics to detail cohort characteristics and compared patients treated with DAPT to those not treated. Statistical significance was set at α = 0.05 and all tests of comparison were two-sided. A total of 383 TIA patients were seen during the study period, 247 were eligible for DAPT. Among those eligible for DAPT, mean age was 72 years and 51% were female. A total of 49 (19.8%) eligible TIA patients were treated with DAPT; use of DAPT significantly increased from 2018 to 2019. Patients admitted to the stroke unit or intensive care unit (n = 33) had a significantly higher proportion of DAPT treatment as compared to those admitted to the general neurology ward or discharged to home from the ED. DAPT use was also significantly higher in patients with large artery atherosclerotic disease (n = 23) as compared to other etiological subtypes and significantly higher among patients who arrived to the ED within 24 h of symptom onset (n = 178). In conclusion, we found that only 2 out of every 10 high-risk TIA patients received DAPT in the years following its introduction in the clinical practice. Our results suggest that strategies to improve the uptake of new, evidence-based secondary stroke prevention treatment after high-risk TIA are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":46355,"journal":{"name":"Neurohospitalist","volume":" ","pages":"19418744241289625"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559464/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurohospitalist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19418744241289625","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multiple randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) significantly reduces the risk of subsequent stroke as compared to aspirin monotherapy after high-risk transient ischemic attack (TIA) or minor ischemic stroke. We sought to evaluate the uptake of DAPT after high-risk TIA at a single center. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive TIA patients admitted via the Emergency Department (ED) of Bern University Hospital (1/1/2018-12/31/2019). We use descriptive statistics to detail cohort characteristics and compared patients treated with DAPT to those not treated. Statistical significance was set at α = 0.05 and all tests of comparison were two-sided. A total of 383 TIA patients were seen during the study period, 247 were eligible for DAPT. Among those eligible for DAPT, mean age was 72 years and 51% were female. A total of 49 (19.8%) eligible TIA patients were treated with DAPT; use of DAPT significantly increased from 2018 to 2019. Patients admitted to the stroke unit or intensive care unit (n = 33) had a significantly higher proportion of DAPT treatment as compared to those admitted to the general neurology ward or discharged to home from the ED. DAPT use was also significantly higher in patients with large artery atherosclerotic disease (n = 23) as compared to other etiological subtypes and significantly higher among patients who arrived to the ED within 24 h of symptom onset (n = 178). In conclusion, we found that only 2 out of every 10 high-risk TIA patients received DAPT in the years following its introduction in the clinical practice. Our results suggest that strategies to improve the uptake of new, evidence-based secondary stroke prevention treatment after high-risk TIA are needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一家大学医院在高风险短暂性脑缺血发作后采用双重抗血小板疗法的情况
多项随机对照试验表明,与阿司匹林单药治疗相比,双联抗血小板疗法(DAPT)可显著降低高危短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)或轻微缺血性脑卒中后继发脑卒中的风险。我们试图评估一个中心在高危 TIA 后接受 DAPT 的情况。我们对伯尔尼大学医院急诊科(ED)收治的连续 TIA 患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究(1/1/2018-12/31/2019)。我们使用描述性统计来详细说明队列特征,并将接受 DAPT 治疗的患者与未接受治疗的患者进行比较。统计显著性设定为α = 0.05,所有比较检验均为双侧检验。研究期间共接诊了 383 名 TIA 患者,其中 247 人符合 DAPT 治疗条件。在符合 DAPT 条件的患者中,平均年龄为 72 岁,51% 为女性。共有 49 名(19.8%)符合条件的 TIA 患者接受了 DAPT 治疗;从 2018 年到 2019 年,DAPT 的使用显著增加。与入住普通神经科病房或从 ED 出院回家的患者相比,入住卒中单元或重症监护单元的患者(n = 33)接受 DAPT 治疗的比例明显更高。与其他病因亚型相比,大动脉粥样硬化性疾病患者(23 人)使用 DAPT 的比例也明显更高,在症状出现 24 小时内到达急诊室的患者(178 人)中使用 DAPT 的比例也明显更高。总之,我们发现,在 DAPT 被引入临床实践后的几年里,每 10 位高风险 TIA 患者中只有 2 位接受了 DAPT 治疗。我们的研究结果表明,需要制定策略来提高高危 TIA 患者对新的、基于循证医学证据的卒中二级预防治疗的接受度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurohospitalist
Neurohospitalist CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
108
期刊最新文献
Navigating the Shift: Comparing Safety and Cost of Tenecteplase versus Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke. A Case of Extended Duration Triple Antithrombotic Therapy in a Patient With an Intracranial Stent and Atrial Fibrillation. Successful Treatment of Cerebral Gnathostomiasis With Solely Steroid Administration: A Case Report. Housing Status and Healthcare Utilization in People Presenting With Seizure. Beyond Septic Encephalopathy: A Case Report of Severe RCVS and PRES in a Patient With HLH due to Appendicitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1