Acute responses to a potentiation warm-up protocol on sprint and change of direction in female football players: a randomized controlled study.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1186/s13102-024-01015-z
Tomás Zylberberg, Ricardo Martins, Svein Arne Pettersen, José Afonso, Ivan André Matias Vale Baptista
{"title":"Acute responses to a potentiation warm-up protocol on sprint and change of direction in female football players: a randomized controlled study.","authors":"Tomás Zylberberg, Ricardo Martins, Svein Arne Pettersen, José Afonso, Ivan André Matias Vale Baptista","doi":"10.1186/s13102-024-01015-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the acute effect of exposure to a potentiation warm-up protocol compared to a usual warm-up program.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomized parallel control trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Synthetic grass in the club's facilities (Portugal).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Seventeen female football players (age: 23.9 ± 3.9 years), were randomly allocated to a control (n = 8) and an experimental group (n = 9). To allocate the players, a table was computer-generated by a research team member with no involvement in the trial.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The control group performed their usual warm-up program, while the experimental group performed a potentiation warm-up protocol with jumps combined with sprints with change of direction.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes measures: </strong>The players were tested pre- and post-intervention for a 40-m linear sprint and pre-planned change of direction using the T-test.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis: </strong>An intention-to-treat analysis was performed, with all the participants originally randomized being involved. The normal distribution was verified by the Shapiro-Wilk test. The assumption of sphericity was analyzed. Effect sizes were calculated using partial eta squared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant pre-post differences in the T-test and in the 40-m sprint were detected for any group. However, in the T-test, large effect sizes in time increments were observed within the experimental (0.27 s; p > 0.05, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.176) and control groups (0.06 s; p > 0.05, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.176). Also, in the 40-m sprint, large effect sizes in time increments were observed within the experimental (0.05 s; p > 0.05, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.251) and control groups (0.09 s; p > 0.05, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.251).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The performance-enhancing ability of the potentiation method performed at warm-up was not verified when applied to female football players. Thus, the potentiation methods may not improve sprint and COD ability for this population. However, the lack of statistical significance may have been due to reduced statistical power, as three of four effects suggest acute performance impairment after a supposed potentiation-oriented warm-up. Nevertheless, the presence of a statistical type 2 error cannot be ruled out.</p><p><strong>Registration number (retrospectively registered): </strong>NCT06555185; Project URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06555185 .</p>","PeriodicalId":48585,"journal":{"name":"BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"16 1","pages":"230"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11555932/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-024-01015-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the acute effect of exposure to a potentiation warm-up protocol compared to a usual warm-up program.

Design: Randomized parallel control trial.

Setting: Synthetic grass in the club's facilities (Portugal).

Participants: Seventeen female football players (age: 23.9 ± 3.9 years), were randomly allocated to a control (n = 8) and an experimental group (n = 9). To allocate the players, a table was computer-generated by a research team member with no involvement in the trial.

Intervention: The control group performed their usual warm-up program, while the experimental group performed a potentiation warm-up protocol with jumps combined with sprints with change of direction.

Main outcomes measures: The players were tested pre- and post-intervention for a 40-m linear sprint and pre-planned change of direction using the T-test.

Statistical analysis: An intention-to-treat analysis was performed, with all the participants originally randomized being involved. The normal distribution was verified by the Shapiro-Wilk test. The assumption of sphericity was analyzed. Effect sizes were calculated using partial eta squared.

Results: No significant pre-post differences in the T-test and in the 40-m sprint were detected for any group. However, in the T-test, large effect sizes in time increments were observed within the experimental (0.27 s; p > 0.05, ηp2 = 0.176) and control groups (0.06 s; p > 0.05, ηp2 = 0.176). Also, in the 40-m sprint, large effect sizes in time increments were observed within the experimental (0.05 s; p > 0.05, ηp2 = 0.251) and control groups (0.09 s; p > 0.05, ηp2 = 0.251).

Conclusions: The performance-enhancing ability of the potentiation method performed at warm-up was not verified when applied to female football players. Thus, the potentiation methods may not improve sprint and COD ability for this population. However, the lack of statistical significance may have been due to reduced statistical power, as three of four effects suggest acute performance impairment after a supposed potentiation-oriented warm-up. Nevertheless, the presence of a statistical type 2 error cannot be ruled out.

Registration number (retrospectively registered): NCT06555185; Project URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06555185 .

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项随机对照研究:女足运动员在冲刺和变向时对强化热身方案的急性反应。
目的评估与常规热身计划相比,接受增效热身计划的急性效果:随机平行对照试验:参与者:17 名女足运动员(年龄:23.9 岁-18 岁):17 名女足运动员(年龄:23.9 ± 3.9 岁)被随机分配到对照组(8 人)和实验组(9 人)。在分配球员时,由一名未参与试验的研究小组成员用电脑制作了一张表格:干预措施:对照组进行常规热身项目,而实验组则进行增强潜能热身方案,包括跳跃和有方向变化的短跑:采用 T 检验法对球员进行干预前后的 40 米直线冲刺和预先计划的变向冲刺测试:进行了意向治疗分析,所有最初被随机分配的参与者都参与其中。正态分布通过 Shapiro-Wilk 检验得到验证。对球形假设进行了分析。疗效大小采用部分 eta 平方计算:各组在 T 测试和 40 米短跑中均未发现明显的前后差异。然而,在 T 检验中,实验组(0.27 秒;p > 0.05,ηp2 = 0.176)和对照组(0.06 秒;p > 0.05,ηp2 = 0.176)在时间递增方面出现了较大的效应量。此外,在 40 米短跑中,实验组(0.05 秒;p > 0.05,ηp2 = 0.251)和对照组(0.09 秒;p > 0.05,ηp2 = 0.251)的时间递增效应大小较大:结论:在女足运动员中应用热身时进行的电位调节法提高成绩的能力没有得到验证。因此,对这一人群来说,强化方法可能无法提高冲刺和 COD 能力。不过,缺乏统计学意义可能是由于统计能力下降,因为四项效应中有三项表明,在进行所谓的以增强潜能为导向的热身后,会出现急性表现障碍。尽管如此,仍不能排除存在统计学上的2型错误。注册号(回顾性注册):NCT06555185; NCT06555185; NCT06555185; NCT06555185:NCT06555185;项目URL:https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06555185 。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation
BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
196
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation is an open access, peer reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of sports medicine and the exercise sciences, including rehabilitation, traumatology, cardiology, physiology, and nutrition.
期刊最新文献
Sprint and jump performance are determined by localized BIA - an ecological study in track and field adolescent athletes. The effects of combined exercises, short foot exercises, and short foot exercises with isometric hip abduction on navicular drop, static parameters, and postural sway in women with flat foot: A randomized trial. Associations between body mass index and physical fitness indicators among Chinese university students: a multicenter cross-sectional study. Self-assessed performance-based function test versus patient-reported outcome measures for knee and hip osteoarthritis. A comparative study of university training of sports and physical activity kinesiologist.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1