Mengying He, Ganisher Davlyatov, Gregory Orewa, Haiyan Qu, Robert Weech-Maldonado
{"title":"Facility- and community-level factors associated with hospice patient experience.","authors":"Mengying He, Ganisher Davlyatov, Gregory Orewa, Haiyan Qu, Robert Weech-Maldonado","doi":"10.1017/S1478951524000907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Mandated by the Affordable Care Act of 2010, hospices were required to provide information regarding the Hospice Quality Reporting Program, with a reduced reimbursement tied to hospices if they fail to submit data to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between hospice organizational and community factors and quality of hospice care as measured by patient experience through Hospice Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers & Systems (CAHPS®) survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used secondary data from Hospice Compare, Healthcare Cost Report Information System Dataset, Rural-urban commuting area codes, and the American Community Survey to examine the relationship between hospice patient/family experience and hospice organizational-level and community-level factors for the period 2017-2020. The unit of analysis was hospice-year observations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For-profit and chain-affiliated hospices were negatively associated with CAHPS® scores. Organizational longevity and Medicare payer mix were positively associated with CAHPS® scores. Hospice community factors including competition, per capita income, and the racial/ethnic minorities' percentage were negatively associated with CAHPS® scores.</p><p><strong>Significance of results: </strong>Hospice organizational and community factors were related to hospice quality of care. Interventions that account for organizational and community factors may be needed to improve patient/family experience of hospice care.</p>","PeriodicalId":47898,"journal":{"name":"Palliative & Supportive Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative & Supportive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951524000907","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Mandated by the Affordable Care Act of 2010, hospices were required to provide information regarding the Hospice Quality Reporting Program, with a reduced reimbursement tied to hospices if they fail to submit data to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between hospice organizational and community factors and quality of hospice care as measured by patient experience through Hospice Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers & Systems (CAHPS®) survey.
Methods: We used secondary data from Hospice Compare, Healthcare Cost Report Information System Dataset, Rural-urban commuting area codes, and the American Community Survey to examine the relationship between hospice patient/family experience and hospice organizational-level and community-level factors for the period 2017-2020. The unit of analysis was hospice-year observations.
Results: For-profit and chain-affiliated hospices were negatively associated with CAHPS® scores. Organizational longevity and Medicare payer mix were positively associated with CAHPS® scores. Hospice community factors including competition, per capita income, and the racial/ethnic minorities' percentage were negatively associated with CAHPS® scores.
Significance of results: Hospice organizational and community factors were related to hospice quality of care. Interventions that account for organizational and community factors may be needed to improve patient/family experience of hospice care.
目标:根据 2010 年《平价医疗法案》(Affordable Care Act of 2010)的规定,安宁疗护机构必须提供有关安宁疗护质量报告计划的信息,如果安宁疗护机构未能向医疗保险与医疗补助服务中心(Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services)提交数据,其报销额度将被降低。本研究的目的是研究安宁疗护组织和社区因素与安宁疗护质量之间的关联,安宁疗护质量通过安宁疗护医疗服务提供者和系统消费者评估(CAHPS®)调查的患者体验来衡量:我们利用安宁疗护比较、医疗成本报告信息系统数据集、城乡通勤区代码和美国社区调查的二手数据,研究了2017-2020年间安宁疗护患者/家属体验与安宁疗护组织层面和社区层面因素之间的关系。分析单位为安宁疗护年观测值:营利性安宁疗护机构和连锁安宁疗护机构与 CAHPS® 评分呈负相关。组织寿命和医疗保险支付方组合与 CAHPS® 分数呈正相关。安宁疗护社区因素(包括竞争、人均收入和少数种族/族裔比例)与 CAHPS® 分数呈负相关:安宁疗护组织和社区因素与安宁疗护质量有关。可能需要考虑组织和社区因素的干预措施来改善病人/家属的安宁疗护体验。