A Diathesis-Stress Approach to Understanding Partner Maltreatment Perpetration: A Longitudinal Study

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Aggressive Behavior Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1002/ab.70010
Laura Knox, Gery C. Karantzas, Emma Marshall
{"title":"A Diathesis-Stress Approach to Understanding Partner Maltreatment Perpetration: A Longitudinal Study","authors":"Laura Knox,&nbsp;Gery C. Karantzas,&nbsp;Emma Marshall","doi":"10.1002/ab.70010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n <p>Despite evidence suggesting that partner maltreatment—a concept which represents a wide array of negative, destructive, and abusive behaviors in romantic relationships—is likely to fluctuate over time, the longitudinal trajectory of partner maltreatment is unclear. This study aims to identify the average trajectory of partner maltreatment over a 5-month period before applying an attachment-informed diathesis-stress framework to explain points of escalation or de-escalation in partner maltreatment perpetration. Two hundred and eight individuals completed 5 monthly assessments of partner maltreatment as well as an assessment of adult attachment and perceived stress at baseline. A nonlinear (i.e., quadratic function) trajectory provided optimal fit for partner maltreatment perpetration over time. An interaction between attachment avoidance and perceived stress predicted the trajectory of partner maltreatment perpetration. Specifically, higher attachment avoidance <i>and</i> higher perceived stress predicted a small initial decline followed by a steep increase in partner maltreatment perpetration. No significant associations were found for the interaction between attachment anxiety and stress and partner maltreatment. The findings suggest that perpetration of partner maltreatment fluctuates over time, and that an attachment-informed diathesis-stress framework can be applied to explain levels of partner maltreatment perpetration and points of escalation and de-escalation over time.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50842,"journal":{"name":"Aggressive Behavior","volume":"50 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aggressive Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ab.70010","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite evidence suggesting that partner maltreatment—a concept which represents a wide array of negative, destructive, and abusive behaviors in romantic relationships—is likely to fluctuate over time, the longitudinal trajectory of partner maltreatment is unclear. This study aims to identify the average trajectory of partner maltreatment over a 5-month period before applying an attachment-informed diathesis-stress framework to explain points of escalation or de-escalation in partner maltreatment perpetration. Two hundred and eight individuals completed 5 monthly assessments of partner maltreatment as well as an assessment of adult attachment and perceived stress at baseline. A nonlinear (i.e., quadratic function) trajectory provided optimal fit for partner maltreatment perpetration over time. An interaction between attachment avoidance and perceived stress predicted the trajectory of partner maltreatment perpetration. Specifically, higher attachment avoidance and higher perceived stress predicted a small initial decline followed by a steep increase in partner maltreatment perpetration. No significant associations were found for the interaction between attachment anxiety and stress and partner maltreatment. The findings suggest that perpetration of partner maltreatment fluctuates over time, and that an attachment-informed diathesis-stress framework can be applied to explain levels of partner maltreatment perpetration and points of escalation and de-escalation over time.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用 "病因-压力 "法理解伴侣虐待行为:纵向研究。
尽管有证据表明伴侣虐待--这一概念代表了恋爱关系中一系列负面的、破坏性的和虐待性的行为--很可能会随着时间的推移而波动,但伴侣虐待的纵向轨迹尚不清楚。本研究旨在确定伴侣虐待行为在5个月内的平均轨迹,然后运用以依恋为基础的症状-压力框架来解释伴侣虐待行为的升级或降级点。共有 28 人完成了 5 个月的伴侣虐待评估以及成人依恋和基线压力评估。非线性(即二次函数)轨迹提供了伴侣虐待行为随时间变化的最佳拟合。依恋回避和感知压力之间的交互作用预测了伴侣虐待行为的轨迹。具体来说,较高的依恋回避程度和较高的压力感知程度预示着伴侣虐待行为最初会有小幅下降,随后会急剧上升。依恋焦虑和压力与伴侣虐待之间的交互作用没有发现明显的关联。研究结果表明,伴侣虐待行为会随着时间的推移而波动,而以依恋为基础的症状-压力框架可以用来解释伴侣虐待行为的水平以及随着时间推移的升级和降级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Aggressive Behavior
Aggressive Behavior 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
52
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Aggressive Behavior will consider manuscripts in the English language concerning the fields of Animal Behavior, Anthropology, Ethology, Psychiatry, Psychobiology, Psychology, and Sociology which relate to either overt or implied conflict behaviors. Papers concerning mechanisms underlying or influencing behaviors generally regarded as aggressive and the physiological and/or behavioral consequences of being subject to such behaviors will fall within the scope of the journal. Review articles will be considered as well as empirical and theoretical articles. Aggressive Behavior is the official journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression.
期刊最新文献
Cyber Aggression and Suicidal Ideation in Emerging Adults: Examining the Potential Roles of Depressive Symptoms and Nonsuicidal Self-Injury A Diathesis-Stress Approach to Understanding Partner Maltreatment Perpetration: A Longitudinal Study How Spiteful Are We? Validation of the Spitefulness Scale in Spaniards Online Violence in Adolescent and Young Adult Couples: The Role of Anxious Attachment and Hostile Sexism in a Dyadic Analysis The Pleasure of Revenge Predicts Both Vengeful and Benevolent Motivations Toward the Provocateur
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1