Outcomes of Transcatheter Arterial Embolization in Patients with Isolated Pelvic Fractures: A Japanese Nationwide Study Focused on Shock Status and Age.
{"title":"Outcomes of Transcatheter Arterial Embolization in Patients with Isolated Pelvic Fractures: A Japanese Nationwide Study Focused on Shock Status and Age.","authors":"Kosuke Otake, Takashi Tagami, Chie Tanaka, Yudai Yoshino, Akihiro Watanabe, Ami Shibata, Kentaro Kuwamoto, Junichi Inoue, Shoji Yokobori","doi":"10.1016/j.jvir.2024.10.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the effect of transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) on the 30-day survival of patients with isolated pelvic fractures, focusing on the influence of shock status and age.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study used data from the Japan Trauma Data Bank (2004-2018). Patients with isolated pelvic fractures, defined by an Abbreviated Injury Scale score of ≥3, were included. Shock (shock index ≥1) and non-shock (shock index <1) were grouped. Inverse probability weighting using propensity scores was performed to adjust for the confounding factors. The primary outcome measure was the 30-day in-hospital mortality. The 30-day survival was compared by age groups: 0-19 years, 20-39 years, 40-59 years, 60-79 years and ≥80 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 5,025 eligible patients, 866 presented with shock, and 4,159 served as the non-shock group. The propensity score analysis showed that there was no significant difference in survival between the TAE and non-TAE groups in patients without shock (TAE group: 92.4% vs. non-TAE group: 92.5%; risk difference -0.05%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.5% to 0.4%). Conversely, for patients with shock, the TAE group had a significantly higher 30-day survival rate than the non-TAE group (83.0% vs. 76.2%; risk difference 6.7%, 95% CI: 5.1% to 8.3%). Among the age groups, the risk difference was highest in the ≥80 years age group (78.5% vs. 66.6%, risk difference 11.9%, 95% CI: 7.7% to 16.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This nationwide study suggested that provision of TAE is associated with improved 30-day survival in patients with isolated pelvic fractures and shock, particularly for those aged ≥80 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":49962,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2024.10.032","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the effect of transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) on the 30-day survival of patients with isolated pelvic fractures, focusing on the influence of shock status and age.
Materials and methods: This retrospective cohort study used data from the Japan Trauma Data Bank (2004-2018). Patients with isolated pelvic fractures, defined by an Abbreviated Injury Scale score of ≥3, were included. Shock (shock index ≥1) and non-shock (shock index <1) were grouped. Inverse probability weighting using propensity scores was performed to adjust for the confounding factors. The primary outcome measure was the 30-day in-hospital mortality. The 30-day survival was compared by age groups: 0-19 years, 20-39 years, 40-59 years, 60-79 years and ≥80 years.
Results: Of the 5,025 eligible patients, 866 presented with shock, and 4,159 served as the non-shock group. The propensity score analysis showed that there was no significant difference in survival between the TAE and non-TAE groups in patients without shock (TAE group: 92.4% vs. non-TAE group: 92.5%; risk difference -0.05%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.5% to 0.4%). Conversely, for patients with shock, the TAE group had a significantly higher 30-day survival rate than the non-TAE group (83.0% vs. 76.2%; risk difference 6.7%, 95% CI: 5.1% to 8.3%). Among the age groups, the risk difference was highest in the ≥80 years age group (78.5% vs. 66.6%, risk difference 11.9%, 95% CI: 7.7% to 16.1%).
Conclusion: This nationwide study suggested that provision of TAE is associated with improved 30-day survival in patients with isolated pelvic fractures and shock, particularly for those aged ≥80 years.
期刊介绍:
JVIR, published continuously since 1990, is an international, monthly peer-reviewed interventional radiology journal. As the official journal of the Society of Interventional Radiology, JVIR is the peer-reviewed journal of choice for interventional radiologists, radiologists, cardiologists, vascular surgeons, neurosurgeons, and other clinicians who seek current and reliable information on every aspect of vascular and interventional radiology. Each issue of JVIR covers critical and cutting-edge medical minimally invasive, clinical, basic research, radiological, pathological, and socioeconomic issues of importance to the field.