Outcomes of Transcatheter Arterial Embolization in Patients with Isolated Pelvic Fractures: A Japanese Nationwide Study Focused on Shock Status and Age.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI:10.1016/j.jvir.2024.10.032
Kosuke Otake, Takashi Tagami, Chie Tanaka, Yudai Yoshino, Akihiro Watanabe, Ami Shibata, Kentaro Kuwamoto, Junichi Inoue, Shoji Yokobori
{"title":"Outcomes of Transcatheter Arterial Embolization in Patients with Isolated Pelvic Fractures: A Japanese Nationwide Study Focused on Shock Status and Age.","authors":"Kosuke Otake, Takashi Tagami, Chie Tanaka, Yudai Yoshino, Akihiro Watanabe, Ami Shibata, Kentaro Kuwamoto, Junichi Inoue, Shoji Yokobori","doi":"10.1016/j.jvir.2024.10.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the effect of transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) on the 30-day survival of patients with isolated pelvic fractures, focusing on the influence of shock status and age.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study used data from the Japan Trauma Data Bank (2004-2018). Patients with isolated pelvic fractures, defined by an Abbreviated Injury Scale score of ≥3, were included. Shock (shock index ≥1) and non-shock (shock index <1) were grouped. Inverse probability weighting using propensity scores was performed to adjust for the confounding factors. The primary outcome measure was the 30-day in-hospital mortality. The 30-day survival was compared by age groups: 0-19 years, 20-39 years, 40-59 years, 60-79 years and ≥80 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 5,025 eligible patients, 866 presented with shock, and 4,159 served as the non-shock group. The propensity score analysis showed that there was no significant difference in survival between the TAE and non-TAE groups in patients without shock (TAE group: 92.4% vs. non-TAE group: 92.5%; risk difference -0.05%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.5% to 0.4%). Conversely, for patients with shock, the TAE group had a significantly higher 30-day survival rate than the non-TAE group (83.0% vs. 76.2%; risk difference 6.7%, 95% CI: 5.1% to 8.3%). Among the age groups, the risk difference was highest in the ≥80 years age group (78.5% vs. 66.6%, risk difference 11.9%, 95% CI: 7.7% to 16.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This nationwide study suggested that provision of TAE is associated with improved 30-day survival in patients with isolated pelvic fractures and shock, particularly for those aged ≥80 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":49962,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2024.10.032","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the effect of transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) on the 30-day survival of patients with isolated pelvic fractures, focusing on the influence of shock status and age.

Materials and methods: This retrospective cohort study used data from the Japan Trauma Data Bank (2004-2018). Patients with isolated pelvic fractures, defined by an Abbreviated Injury Scale score of ≥3, were included. Shock (shock index ≥1) and non-shock (shock index <1) were grouped. Inverse probability weighting using propensity scores was performed to adjust for the confounding factors. The primary outcome measure was the 30-day in-hospital mortality. The 30-day survival was compared by age groups: 0-19 years, 20-39 years, 40-59 years, 60-79 years and ≥80 years.

Results: Of the 5,025 eligible patients, 866 presented with shock, and 4,159 served as the non-shock group. The propensity score analysis showed that there was no significant difference in survival between the TAE and non-TAE groups in patients without shock (TAE group: 92.4% vs. non-TAE group: 92.5%; risk difference -0.05%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.5% to 0.4%). Conversely, for patients with shock, the TAE group had a significantly higher 30-day survival rate than the non-TAE group (83.0% vs. 76.2%; risk difference 6.7%, 95% CI: 5.1% to 8.3%). Among the age groups, the risk difference was highest in the ≥80 years age group (78.5% vs. 66.6%, risk difference 11.9%, 95% CI: 7.7% to 16.1%).

Conclusion: This nationwide study suggested that provision of TAE is associated with improved 30-day survival in patients with isolated pelvic fractures and shock, particularly for those aged ≥80 years.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
孤立性骨盆骨折患者经导管动脉栓塞术的疗效:以休克状态和年龄为重点的日本全国性研究。
目的:研究经导管动脉栓塞术(TAE)对孤立性骨盆骨折患者30天生存率的影响,重点关注休克状态和年龄的影响:这项回顾性队列研究使用了日本创伤数据库(2004-2018年)的数据。研究纳入了骨盆孤立性骨折患者,其定义为简易损伤量表评分≥3分。休克(休克指数≥1)和非休克(休克指数 结果:在符合条件的 5025 名患者中,有 866 人出现休克,4159 人属于非休克组。倾向得分分析显示,在无休克的患者中,TAE 组和非 TAE 组的存活率无明显差异(TAE 组:92.4%;非 TAE 组:92.4%):92.4%;风险差异-0.5%:92.5%;风险差异-0.05%,95%置信区间[CI]:-0.5%至0.4%)。相反,对于休克患者,TAE 组的 30 天存活率明显高于非 TAE 组(83.0% 对 76.2%;风险差异为 6.7%,95% 置信区间:5.1% 至 8.3%)。在各年龄组中,≥80 岁年龄组的风险差异最大(78.5% 对 66.6%,风险差异为 11.9%,95% CI:7.7% 至 16.1%):这项全国性研究表明,对孤立性骨盆骨折合并休克的患者,尤其是年龄≥80岁的患者,提供TAE可提高其30天生存率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.30%
发文量
942
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: JVIR, published continuously since 1990, is an international, monthly peer-reviewed interventional radiology journal. As the official journal of the Society of Interventional Radiology, JVIR is the peer-reviewed journal of choice for interventional radiologists, radiologists, cardiologists, vascular surgeons, neurosurgeons, and other clinicians who seek current and reliable information on every aspect of vascular and interventional radiology. Each issue of JVIR covers critical and cutting-edge medical minimally invasive, clinical, basic research, radiological, pathological, and socioeconomic issues of importance to the field.
期刊最新文献
Risks of Aliquot Delivery of Conformable Embolic Material: Embolic Dislodgement Resulting in Non-target Embolization. A Decade Long Analysis of Healthcare Disparities and Uterine Artery Embolization: An Exploration of Social Determinants of Health. Attrition Rates in Interventional Radiology Integrated Residency Programs. Combining Radioembolization and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: The Quest for Synergy. Percutaneous Anterograde Varicocele Embolisation: Technique and Clinical Outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1