"No doctor ever asked me…so I thought it wasn't a valid concern": endometriosis patients' perspectives of barriers and facilitators to sexual health communication in general practice.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Journal of Sexual Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1093/jsxmed/qdae145
Rebekah Allison Davenport, Jacqueline Mills, Hannah McHardy, Taryn Lores, Kerry Sherman, RoseAnne Misajon, Leesa Van Niekerk
{"title":"\"No doctor ever asked me…so I thought it wasn't a valid concern\": endometriosis patients' perspectives of barriers and facilitators to sexual health communication in general practice.","authors":"Rebekah Allison Davenport, Jacqueline Mills, Hannah McHardy, Taryn Lores, Kerry Sherman, RoseAnne Misajon, Leesa Van Niekerk","doi":"10.1093/jsxmed/qdae145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sexual health communication between general practitioners (GPs) and individuals with chronic diseases is well documented as an important component of sexual well-being. However, a notable gap exists in understanding factors that contribute to sexual health communication in the endometriosis context. Endometriosis-related research has focused on the assessment of sexual functioning and its role in influencing health-related quality of life, with a limited understanding of the management of sexual well-being in primary healthcare settings.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore how individuals with endometriosis perceive their experiences of sexual health communication with GPs to understand the barriers and facilitators of this communication in general practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study formed part of a larger online quantitative survey measuring psychological and sexual well-being in individuals with endometriosis. In total 141 participants provided responses via open-ended unlimited free-text questions focused on their experiences of sexual health communication with GPs, including their perspectives on barriers and facilitators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four overarching themes regarding barriers to sexual health communication were identified through thematic template analysis: (1) systemic factors; (2) practitioner factors; (3) patient factors; and (4) interpersonal factors. Facilitators mirrored strategies to address these barriers. Additionally, participants offered recommendations for developing resources to improve sexual health communication.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Despite patients' interest, sexual health concerns in endometriosis are commonly overlooked in general practice due to various barriers, which individuals suggest could be addressed through comprehensive GP education and practical aids including communication tools.</p><p><strong>Strengths and limitations: </strong>Although the sample is large for a qualitative study, the potential selection bias-stemming from participants' high levels of sexual dysfunction and motivation to discuss sexual health with a GP-may limit the diversity of perspectives. GP perspectives were not evaluated, precluding any assessment of the accuracy of individuals' perceptions of practitioner factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Individuals with endometriosis encounter various systematic, practitioner, personal, and interpersonal factors that hinder or facilitate sexual health communication in general practice. Future research should prioritize strategies to improve sexual health communication for both GPs and patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":51100,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sexual Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"26-35"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sexual Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/qdae145","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sexual health communication between general practitioners (GPs) and individuals with chronic diseases is well documented as an important component of sexual well-being. However, a notable gap exists in understanding factors that contribute to sexual health communication in the endometriosis context. Endometriosis-related research has focused on the assessment of sexual functioning and its role in influencing health-related quality of life, with a limited understanding of the management of sexual well-being in primary healthcare settings.

Aim: To explore how individuals with endometriosis perceive their experiences of sexual health communication with GPs to understand the barriers and facilitators of this communication in general practice.

Methods: This study formed part of a larger online quantitative survey measuring psychological and sexual well-being in individuals with endometriosis. In total 141 participants provided responses via open-ended unlimited free-text questions focused on their experiences of sexual health communication with GPs, including their perspectives on barriers and facilitators.

Results: Four overarching themes regarding barriers to sexual health communication were identified through thematic template analysis: (1) systemic factors; (2) practitioner factors; (3) patient factors; and (4) interpersonal factors. Facilitators mirrored strategies to address these barriers. Additionally, participants offered recommendations for developing resources to improve sexual health communication.

Clinical implications: Despite patients' interest, sexual health concerns in endometriosis are commonly overlooked in general practice due to various barriers, which individuals suggest could be addressed through comprehensive GP education and practical aids including communication tools.

Strengths and limitations: Although the sample is large for a qualitative study, the potential selection bias-stemming from participants' high levels of sexual dysfunction and motivation to discuss sexual health with a GP-may limit the diversity of perspectives. GP perspectives were not evaluated, precluding any assessment of the accuracy of individuals' perceptions of practitioner factors.

Conclusions: Individuals with endometriosis encounter various systematic, practitioner, personal, and interpersonal factors that hinder or facilitate sexual health communication in general practice. Future research should prioritize strategies to improve sexual health communication for both GPs and patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"没有医生问过我......所以我认为这不是一个合理的问题":子宫内膜异位症患者对全科医生进行性健康交流的障碍和促进因素的看法。
背景:全科医生(GP)与慢性病患者之间的性健康交流是性健康的重要组成部分,这一点已得到充分证实。然而,在了解促进子宫内膜异位症患者性健康交流的因素方面还存在明显差距。目的:探讨子宫内膜异位症患者如何看待他们与全科医生进行性健康交流的经历,以了解全科医生进行性健康交流的障碍和促进因素:本研究是一项大型在线定量调查的一部分,旨在测量子宫内膜异位症患者的心理和性健康情况。共有 141 名参与者通过开放式无限制自由文本问题回答了他们与全科医生进行性健康交流的经历,包括他们对障碍和促进因素的看法:通过主题模板分析,确定了有关性健康交流障碍的四大主题:(1) 系统因素;(2) 医生因素;(3) 患者因素;(4) 人际因素。促进者反映了解决这些障碍的策略。此外,参与者还就开发资源以改善性健康交流提出了建议:尽管患者对此很感兴趣,但由于存在各种障碍,子宫内膜异位症患者的性健康问题在全科诊疗中通常被忽视,参与者建议可通过全科医生综合教育和包括沟通工具在内的实用辅助工具来解决这些问题:尽管对于一项定性研究而言,样本数量较大,但由于参与者的性功能障碍程度较高,且愿意与全科医生讨论性健康问题,因此可能存在选择偏差,从而限制了观点的多样性。由于没有对全科医生的观点进行评估,因此无法对个人对医生因素看法的准确性进行评估:结论:子宫内膜异位症患者会遇到各种系统性因素、从业人员因素、个人因素和人际因素,这些因素阻碍或促进了全科医生的性健康沟通。未来的研究应优先考虑改善全科医生和患者性健康沟通的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Sexual Medicine
Journal of Sexual Medicine 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
826
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sexual Medicine publishes multidisciplinary basic science and clinical research to define and understand the scientific basis of male, female, and couples sexual function and dysfunction. As an official journal of the International Society for Sexual Medicine and the International Society for the Study of Women''s Sexual Health, it provides healthcare professionals in sexual medicine with essential educational content and promotes the exchange of scientific information generated from experimental and clinical research. The Journal of Sexual Medicine includes basic science and clinical research studies in the psychologic and biologic aspects of male, female, and couples sexual function and dysfunction, and highlights new observations and research, results with innovative treatments and all other topics relevant to clinical sexual medicine. The objective of The Journal of Sexual Medicine is to serve as an interdisciplinary forum to integrate the exchange among disciplines concerned with the whole field of human sexuality. The journal accomplishes this objective by publishing original articles, as well as other scientific and educational documents that support the mission of the International Society for Sexual Medicine.
期刊最新文献
Testosterone replacement therapy in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer. New insights into the goals of transgender male versus non-binary individuals considering metoidioplasty and phalloplasty gender-affirming surgery. Preservation of sexual function with Optilume-a novel treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. Profiles of testosterone and pre-androgens and sexual function in premenopausal women. Penile regenerative and aesthetic procedure trends among Sexual Medicine Society of North America members.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1